Okay, rereading the whole thread while we wait for Whiskers to grace us with her presence.
In post 37, Natural_river wrote:Well N, life is full of surprises, people die sometimes.
This was actually not a test on what you guys would react to the question, but more a test to see what
you would react to what I would react to your answers.
Wow, that was confusing...
But what I can say is that the only one's reaction I liked, was N's...
I like the idea of it, but it isn't fully correct.
I don't know why Zoroaster is openly asking Om of the nom on who to vote.
Zoroaster, are you trying to make an obvious mafia-read so we overlook it,
because it is too obvious?
Fuck, Natural_river was an idiot. This post is horrible.
In post 46, guille2015 wrote:N that seems a lot like miss representation. I get a town felling from River. I also get a town read from Om. So For me at this point find N and Zoro as scum. It's just a matter of who is the godfather.
Guille's only strong read is that Om is town.
This reads like Om wanting someone to call him out on his bussing.
In post 132, Whiskers wrote:Wow, ALL parties in this game are being antagonistic.
NatRiver is asking weirdass philisophical questions about exploding babies . I know, I know, RQS, and it's too early to detract from scumhunting. But jesus, what does that have to do with fucking
anything
?
Om, I believe is smarter than he's acting. Zor's attack on you was "You did something scummy", not "You didn't give us answers". You answering the questions NOW would not erase the scummy way you answered them before.
N is being an asshole, in the later pages. Zor's "hypothetical bullshit" TOTALLY had relevance to the game: he was demonstrating how a scumtell can't be undone. I don't really believe N doesn't understand this. Also, PAge 3 or so, instead of looking at the post he's supposed to refer to, he just yells some more.
As for Zor himself, it wouldn't have killed him to link or re-quote the post his weird-ass sentence apparently refers to. Being a stubborn cunt? I have a gut townread here though.
Whiskers replaces in and essentially calls everyone fuckwits.
In post 142, Whiskers wrote:Somebody look at Guille's ISO, though.
0: confirm, 1: fluff, 2: fluff, 3: reads, 4: clarify, 5: filler.
6: Ask Zoro's reads. 7: Ask River's reads. 8: express confusion over River's alt's post.
9: says that his reads have changed, but not what they are. 10: V/LA announcement.
11: asks River her read on Om (again), 12: "Yay, a pony" asks my read on himself.
13 and 14 came just now:
13: Asks Om his read on me. 14: asks N if he would lynch me, not Zor. What happened to that River townread?
We've seen not so much activity from you, guille. Everyone else has 30 some posts, you have under half that. Five of them are needless. Six of them are questions (that you never follow up on). Three are game-related, but your reads hold no weight because you don't have any reasons behind them...
And, look, this is me OMGUSsing, but You go from a townread on my slot and a One-of-each read on N and Zor, to "Hey N, would you lynch Whiskers instead?"
Vote: Guille
Sorry. Had a townread on you, until I read your ISO. You post so seldom that I didn't really read you as scummy in my readthrough.
This attack of guille feels way over-the-top, especially the bit where Whiskers gets riled up over guille asking me whether I'd lynch her.
In post 151, Whiskers wrote: In post 139, N wrote:Anyway, back on track: do you agree with Zoroaster's assertion that answering questions sarcastically is a scum-tell?
Yes, probably.
Would have had a bigger scumread on Om if he kept "not understanding."
#147, GuilleI don't know yet. Probably not Zoroaster, which leaves N and Om.
But: Let me put it this way. If you are the godfather, I don't need to know the second scum. If you are the goon, I will look for associative tells, as few as they will be. If you are town, you can shoot me.
It looks like Whiskers caught some scummy behaviour from Om, but didn't want to draw too much attention to it and just brushed it off and changed the subject.
In post 152, guille2015 wrote:Ok, I think that you are Town Whiskers. Because your play is completely the opposite of Natural River's reads. I would think that if you were scum you'd share some of them. That is not definite though. But your play is town aligned and I had a town read on NR.
I disagree with this point, but that's irrelevant because you're not both scum.
In post 157, guille2015 wrote:As for relying on Busing. Well. I had two townreads, NR and Om. I kept my townread on whiskers since it has been satisfactory for me. But Om's town read contradicts the connections that I have and the Town read on Whiskers. Like I said: from my prespective there is 1 scum between Om and Whiskers and 1 scum between N and Zoro. I am not certain for the latter, but I am certain for the first group mostly based on my town read of Whiskers.
Guille's trying to force two 1v1s with flimsy reasonings.
In post 163, guille2015 wrote: In post 159, Whiskers wrote:You have literally given us two coin flips. Show us your web, because you keep referencing a bunch of abstract associations that we havn't seen.
Well, N and Zoro cannot be both scum. Any one could have gotten the other Lynched. If that's the case, then the other scum is between Whisker, Om, and me. I know I am town and I have a town read on Whiskers. The last one left is OmNom. That is the simplest form I can put it.
I was also saying that Whiskers and Om cannot be both scum independently from N and Zoro because they both seemed antagonistic to each other. At a much less degree than the other pair, which could be a simple game of bus the GF. If this is the case then both N and Zoro are town. Which again will mean that Om is scum.
From all the ways I see it, Om is in the middle as scum.
The only way I could be wrong is if one of N or Zoro is scum and Whiskers is the other scum. But my only town read of this game is on Whiskers. So, I have no doubt of my vote.
In post 164, Abaddon wrote:I am convinced. N is painfully ObvTown, Om is painfully obvscum, N_R/Whiskers is probably scum, and Guille is probably Town by PoE.
In post 182, N wrote:
Just... anyone? Or someone in particular?
In post 196, Whiskers wrote:in short: he was a dick. Both would have killed the other-- except I suppose Nexus wouldn't have killed anybody.
This is a pretty shit reason.
In post 203, Whiskers wrote:Sorry, what was I supposed to do? Pick one of you to attack and build a case?
Well, yes. It's lylo; I know you've done this sort of thing before.
In post 211, guille2015 wrote:Well, I'm 90% or so sure of my vote. But I don't want to vote until you replay just in case. I will also not say who it is so that it might not influence your statement. But don't worry as soon as you write your statement I will vote. (Sundays are hard for me to replay though, but I'll try. )
How do you think Whiskers will be influenced by your vote? It's either going to be on her or on me.