1. Nickname you'd like to go by?
2. Gender?
3. Times you'll likely be able to post? Or not post.
4. Thoughts on meta?
5. Thoughts on reaction fishing?
6. How do you feel about walls? Do you make them?
7. Are you scum?
1. Mala is totally fine.
2. Female, age, older than Tracey.
3. Depends on work/class, but normally I can post several times a day. With hurricane approaching might limited.
4. Meta is useful for finding scum!
5. Bit of a toss up, honestly.
6. Used to be from a wall community. They don't bother me either way, but used to making them, but normally don't.
7. Nawp.
I'm not going to bother answering rqs since I'm on my phone, you can imagine I gave boring answers if you like though.
And now I don't even remember who is in this game with a name I can write easily on the phone so I may have to skip rvs as well
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
1. Nickname you'd like to go by?
2. Gender?
3. Times you'll likely be able to post? Or not post.
4. Thoughts on meta?
5. Thoughts on reaction fishing?
6. How do you feel about walls? Do you make them?
7. Are you scum?
1. Call me GNR or Riggs, doesn't matter
2. Male, 18
3. Mostly at nights and sometimes throughout the day
4. Indifferent about it. It just shouldn't be the sole case on someone, but it could be helpful as a start
5. Go for it
6. I skim them looking for my name if I see them (for the most part) and I rarely make them. If I do, I put spoils in it
7. I'm not, but I'll let you guys decide if my actions prove that
1. Nickname you'd like to go by?
2. Gender?
3. Times you'll likely be able to post? Or not post.
4. Thoughts on meta?
5. Thoughts on reaction fishing?
6. How do you feel about walls? Do you make them?
7. Are you scum?
1) Commie works. If you're incredibly lazy, I'll respond to CX, but will probably judge you.
2) I AM MAN.
3) I have rehearsals at night, so most of the time, I'll be posting noon-6 and past 9.
4) Can be useful, but should not be relied on.
5) Honestly, not a fan. It's far too easy to fall back on as an excuse for strange/scummy play.
6) The last time a commie made a wall, it did not end well.
In all seriousness though, there is a time and a place.
7) Nope.
@Tracey: Is asking RQS a predominantly scummy thing? Is it something you habitually do as scum? Or as town?
And no, I'm not sheeping you yet. I like my vote on the person who, instead of not voting, or voting for no lynch, or voting arbitrarily for someone, felt they had to point out and reinforce their indecision by voting undecided. A vote on Riggs can wait until he does something scummier.
I can say stuff of less significance if you'd rather. (such as answering your RQS)
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
I don't see how my answer is bad. Isn't that what the game of mafia is all about? Judging others reactions to see if they're town or scum? I can't show you my role pm saying I'm town, so for now you only have my word on the matter
@Mit: I do RQS as both alignments. I made that statement because there's often one or more people who tend to state their dislike for RQS or the lack of benefits from it - those people tend to be the experienced players (note: I only really play in newbie games, so those are the games I'll be referring to). Since this is a game of predominantly (or all) experienced players, I expected more complaining. Instead I got several people who willingly responded, one who found it necessary to point out he couldn't respond so he wasn't, and one who actually disagreed with it. The lack of complaints towards the RQS made me uneasy.
As for PM, why do you think he voted undecided? I'll go out on a limb and say it was a reaction fish. Looks to me like PM got a bite (yes, I did just make that analogy). Why do you think voting undecided was scummy? You mentioned voting for a no lynch or not voting would be better - would either of those achieve better results? What's different from PM saying he's undecided compared to Cheery saying he wasn't going to vote due to not remembering the players names? Both were useless statements.
@Cheery: Why was the RQS insignificant, and why did you choose to say that you couldn't do the RQS (because you were on your phone) rather than you wouldn't (because it was insignificant)?
@Riggs: It was scummy because it seems like you're trying way to hard to appease us.
@Tracey: Actually, I'm inexperienced. And although I wouldn't ask RQS, I don't mind answering them.
Also, Cheery said that he was on his phone. I understood his post to mean that a) he's active, but unable to do much until he's on a proper computer and b) he'd be getting on one soon. He could start some proper activity then. PMyst, on the other hand decided to go with a pointless move, of "voting undecided". Note that he didn't simply say "I don't know whom to vote", or something similar. He used the vote format, showing that he really wanted to press home his indecision. Compare also to Newbie 1275, where as town he started with an actual vote instead.
Also, note that I voted for PMyst before Cheery said anything. Even if I'm wrong and Cheery's action is as scummy as PMyst's, there is no advantage on switching my vote between equally scummy players, unless one is closer to a lynch.
And yeah, Riggs' answer to question 7 is a bit iffy, because he's basically saying "I'm not scum, but I might be lying, can you figure out which it is?", but town can also do that. And like I said, he can be voted for, when he does something even scummier, it's not like a wagon has to form immediately.
In post 36, TraceyLyn11 wrote:@Cheery: Why was the RQS insignificant, and why did you choose to say that you couldn't do the RQS (because you were on your phone) rather than you wouldn't (because it was insignificant)?
Because I was on my phone, I have found all RQS's to be insignificant from the times I have answered, however this is first time it has been used that I haven't given any answers.
I probably would have bothered answering had I been on my computer when the game started, but being on my phone I decided not to answer them. I didn't even bother reading them at that stage, they may have actually magically gained (I seriously doubt it) some significance by the time I came onto a computer.
The second sentence was also there because I wanted to write a full username out of a player for a first vote, and I couldn't remember if there were any players here that had full english words as their username - I guess the closest is PM, but I'd end up having a space in his name because my phone operates with a swype keyboard. riggs was also close but I'd end up with spaces instead of underscores. Maybe I should have just selfvoted since my name works well.
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
In post 39, Mitillos wrote:So, Cheery, I take it you're on a computer now. How about some votes or reads?
You trying to make me do work here, how am I meant to be a lazy member of the town if I have to work?
Tentative townreads on Taz, PM & GNR.
Even more tentativie town on you and Tracey.
Thus currently I believe the scum team is Commie & Mala. VOTE: Malakittens
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
and I have no idea where Klick is, must also be part of the scumteam, but I don't know how that works.
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
I'm just not confident in them yet, so I voted the read that hadn't got any votes yet.
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
That sounds like it should be useful, though I'm not entirely sure why, I'll have to revoke my tentative townread on him because I can see a glimmer of logic about not talking about jiggypuff yet.
(and I can't explain it either because it would indeed ruin what was happening by doing it - but me agreeing or whatever has likely ruined anyway duh)
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
- singleton votes are really not useful so not really seeing a reason to drop one.
Because I was seeing everyone else as town atm, whereas you and commie were sitting at null
so was kilick, but he was so far null that I forgot to mention him in that post.
this is known as PoE to most viewers. I am by no means 100% on you two being the scumteam as it is quite possible one (or two) of my so called town reads is currently doing a good job hiding amongst the town.
A singleton vote does more than not having any votes.
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
.
