In post 32, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:In post 30, Majiffy wrote:Well lets go ahead and flip Siv then and see.
Is this a serious post?
Yes it did. I wanted to know whether or not you really wanted to flip Siv now haphazardly. And that is an opinion.
In post 32, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:In post 30, Majiffy wrote:Well lets go ahead and flip Siv then and see.
Is this a serious post?
In post 42, Melmond wrote:In post 23, Voidedmafia wrote:Mollie, P-Rat could be bussing scumSiv for some amount of towncred?
That seems a little bit far fetched. We don't even know sivs alignment yet, to be guessing that rat's bussing him just seems wierd at this point in the game..
In post 49, Majiffy wrote:Ah but the question had nothing to do with opinions.
In post 57, Voidedmafia wrote:In post 42, Melmond wrote:In post 23, Voidedmafia wrote:Mollie, P-Rat could be bussing scumSiv for some amount of towncred?
That seems a little bit far fetched. We don't even know sivs alignment yet, to be guessing that rat's bussing him just seems wierd at this point in the game..
Mollie was saying that there was no scum motivation there. I was simply pointing out that there is, even if it's not the best kind of motivation at that point in time.
I guess I can get the irritation behind the vote, but I guess I don't really like it.
In post 49, Majiffy wrote:Ah but the question had nothing to do with opinions.
...actually a fair point, given what this argument is all referring to.
This argument feels a lot like orcinus is unnecessarily making a mountain out of a molehill. Was Majiffy's response to the original question annoying? Yes. Should he actually try to come up with a well-thought-out response outlining why he wants to just hang Siv anyways (even if it's already been stated)? Probably. Is the ruckus orcinus causing because of this really worth it? IMO not really.
Vote: Orcinus
In post 56, Majiffy wrote:Oh and by the way, I'd still like an answer tomyquestions thatyou'renow deliberately avoiding.
In post 59, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:What exactly are you voting me for again? I mean, since you've said that Majiffy was being annoying with his refusal to answer question, you think that my persistance in following up is...scummy somehow?
That's terrible.
In post 33, Majiffy wrote:Would you like it to be?
In post 45, Majiffy wrote:So if I'm being anti-town for the purpose of being anti-town, how is that indicative of my alignment?
In post 55, Majiffy wrote:Whether or not I want to flip him and whether or not I think he's a good lynch are two independent thoughts. So why don't you ask me which one you really mean?
In post 62, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:What is going on here and why are you allowed to play like this this isn't fair
In post 30, Majiffy wrote:Well lets go ahead and flip Siv then and see.
In post 69, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Irrelevant to your answer.
Putting words in the mouth of others, are we?
In post 69, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:In post 30, Majiffy wrote:Well lets go ahead and flip Siv then and see.
Sorry buddy, you can't construe that as anything other than flip=lynch in this sentence. Nice try though?
In post 70, Majiffy wrote:In post 69, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Irrelevant to your answer.
Putting words in the mouth of others, are we?
I'm just responding to what you said, as you said it. But it's interesting that you bring this up, just as soon as you say this;
In post 69, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:In post 30, Majiffy wrote:Well lets go ahead and flip Siv then and see.
Sorry buddy, you can't construe that as anything other than flip=lynch in this sentence. Nice try though?
What we were talking about was the difference between "do I want a flip on x" or "do I think x makes a good lynch?" To which the distinction I've outlined still holds. I never tried to construe anything, you're the one mincing words. We can flip Siv without a flip on Siv necessarily being a good lynch.
But by all means, continue to attack the person instead of the argument. I'm sure it will reflect excellently upon you when the rest of the playerlist eventually shows up.
In post 72, Majiffy wrote:Again you're missing the point. A 'good' lynch is one that is a scum lynch. You can have plenty of lynches that aren't good ones.
Also I think you'll note that the question wasn't about my vote as I didn't actually lay one down.