I don't find it suspicious at all. He built a case and I don't disagree with him.In post 733, Aj The Epic wrote:Jason's vote is suspiciously sitting on someone who has very little to do with this conversation.
p732... Can we please kill this guy already? I know that we're all waiting for kmd and I think he's Scum as well, but can we at least get the
Well, considering the alternative...In post 734, fuzzybutternut wrote:Honestly, I'd have to agree with you there
I think you're being a tad dramatic, Jason. I want thud/kmd to swing too, just after fuzz. I don't think that 'no one is concerned', we just have bigger fish to asphyxiate. Seriously, though I would like to be careful in this regard. While I agree that we need content before the Day ends, I think that Lynching a{n active} Lurker is not the right way to go about things. My strong recommendation is that we Lynch a scummy player and then worry about the invisible player when it comes time. After all, what you're pursuing went a long way to me winning my first Scum game way back in the day.In post 740, JasonWazza wrote:Why the hell is no-one concerned with a slot with what may as well be 0 content?
tbc...