In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:Commenting that SAD and Cerulean are townie is a waste of time here, more talk about people that can actually be scum.
hang on, what? when is it ever a waste of time to comment on townreads?
In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:Commenting that SAD and Cerulean are townie is a waste of time here, more talk about people that can actually be scum.
In post 145, TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:I don't know what BoP means. And yes, I wouldn't be surprised if you personally had tunneled as scum on the best available player, because you usually have an attitude and overbrimming confidence. How terrible of me to have expected you to be trying great things instead of letting you sleep in like posting is ruining your beauty sleep. Instead of asking me what poor little Benmage could possibly do, just do something awesome or get on the rope.
Burden of Proficiency. You're attacking him because "OMG Benmage hasn't corralled the scum already." It's a logical fallacy and using it as the basis to say someone is scum is quite scummy.
In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:The gist of what I said is still the same though. I said he was doing nothing but rp complaining.All I've done in that post is explained it better.
In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:Actually addressing continued Benmaging:
I've never seen scum successfully hide behind Roleplaying. I've rarely seen scum be motivated enough to try in the first place. Making up reads + trying to make them sound in character = :effort: More people should be forced to keep up stupid rp gimmicks just to see if they can keep it up.
In post 150, TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:Commenting that SAD and Cerulean are townie is a waste of time here, more talk about people that can actually be scum.
hang on, what? when is it ever a waste of time to comment on townreads?
In post 152, Benmage wrote:In post 150, TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:Commenting that SAD and Cerulean are townie is a waste of time here, more talk about people that can actually be scum.
hang on, what? when is it ever a waste of time to comment on townreads?
Actually that read fairly townish from Shadow.... Cerul does ready pretty obvious town, and I wager my best town read thus far (although that's just from my shitty reading at work).
The point Shadow was making is we don't need everyone putting in the facade of 'reading' people by naming Cerulean town.
In post 154, ChannelDelibird wrote:People stating opinions is a good thing. It ties them to those opinions for later.
In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:
In post 120, Benmage wrote:In post 100, Shadoweh wrote:outright having to tell people he wasn't going to be super active in a game.
Lost me on this one...What's it mean?
Weather Mafia II. Since it's impossible to direct link I'll just quote it.
"FYI This game with feature an atypical Benmage. I'm busier with life. I'm in less mafia. I'm a bit burnt out, but not spent yet. (Plus this one looked fun). So I don't want to hear any shit come d3/d4 zomg Benmage isn't playing like Benmage of old. (Get it out now, or get over it.) Activity will likely be in spurts, and much less dense."
In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:How terrible of me to have expected you to be trying great things instead of letting you sleep in like posting is ruining your beauty sleep. Instead of asking me what poor little Benmage could possibly do
In post 155, TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:In post 154, ChannelDelibird wrote:People stating opinions is a good thing. It ties them to those opinions for later.
qft
In post 151, Benmage wrote:Which btw camn, doesn't look like a PR, as pretty sure he broke 'character' in his red text.
In post 160, McStab wrote:Nostredeus is scum. Brings up a bad idea WITH an implicit suggestion, that scum would have minor roles. This reads to me like scum who has a fakeclaim that isn't minor, thereby trying to divert suspicion from himself. Then he gives up the idea at the slightest pressure.
So to be clear what you wanted to see happen there was me to not explain why I thought it was a good idea and then once proven wrong to keep pushing the idea?
In post 162, ChannelDelibird wrote:Nost struck me as pretty genuine in that exchange. Come vote SafetyDance instead, McStab.
In post 132, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:In post 103, Nostredeus wrote:<snip>
Do you happen to be a Tazaro alt bro?
In post 164, McStab wrote:It's all about context. You tried to come across non-committed to it so that if you got called out for role fishing you'd have an alibi. But you managed to get swayed by one small, two or three sentence post that doesn't even address that issue solely?
I asked for thoughts, I got some, I responded appropriately. The "one small, two or three sentence post" both addresses the idea and shows it to be a really bad one, frankly you can't expect players to be right all of the time in this game and if you start lynching players for both putting out ideas and retracting bad ones we're screwed.
Also yeah you jumped on the Shadoweh wagon in that post and then Shadoweh convinced you why it was a bad idea. So you voted for the person you presumed to be scummiest and then got convinced by said scummy person (without you changing your opinion on him, as evidenced by your 77/78 is still scummy comment) to change your idea?
I'm not sure I'm reading this right but I think you're saying I was convinced my mass name claim idea was bad by someone I thought was scum, but in reality I should have been unconvinced by it not because it was unconvincing but because it was said by a scum read? If that's not what you are saying then sorry to misrep you but I think I've got that right.