I'm interpreting this: post 227 as Baby Spice being coming off as genuine + gut.... Someone correct me if I'm wrong here.
In post 228, sottyrulez wrote:I find post 125 pretty scummy. Just the support of both of the underwhelming Nostredeus and Shadow wagons is all kinds of blegh.
That's an interesting point (gonna iso TGAH, thought I was reading him town)
In post 244, Cerulean wrote:I think your push on nost is reaching because he reads fairly townish in his response, and reallywhat would your opinion of him been if he had clung to the not wise thing of mass name claiming?
Good question.
In post 251, DeasVail wrote:Benmage, why did you give away that you don't like early cutesy behaviour at the time when you'd most expect it from scum?
Guess I wasn't thinking there, and just trying to engage in convo's.
In post 253, camn wrote:Im sure they would post a QT to 'prove' it, if that werent against the rules (and famously faked in the past)
Where was this, I've wanted to do that forever, but sadly I don't Hydra. There was a game where all the Hydra did was post partner conversations... they were universally accepted as town. I was scum (think I had to NK them)
In post 254, Plessiezarus wrote:Not quite as bad as the people who are voting SAD because of his RP, but close
Outside of SafetyDance, who else voted SAD for RP?
In post 254, Plessiezarus wrote:Don't think much of the wagon on Nostrodeus. The name-claim suggestion sounds more like a sign of inexperience (either in Farday-modded games in particular or Large Theme games in general), and the rest of his posts seem consistent with this.
Ditto this.
In post 258, Cerulean wrote:I have a pretty easy time reading Arthurbut I'm struggling this game I think largely due to his RP'ing.
inb4itoldyouso
In post 265, Plessiezarus wrote:
In post 258, Cerulean wrote:I don't see how SafetyDance's vote on Arthur in #113 is overexplained at all, in fact my problem with it is the exact opposite - it feels extremely lazy and undercooked.
Overexplained in the sense that, once he said he was sheeping Benmage and voting because of the "annoying" RP, the comment about SAD's avatar seem redundant? Like, why say that at all unless you're worried your vote might be seen as too unoriginal? ("Overexplained" doesn't mean "not lazy".)
Don't really care that he didn't comment on the "major topics of discussion", since ... yeah, they were boring.
I think taking both views makes it pretty bad for Safety.
-You have him ignoring most discussion.
-You have a shit vote, with shittier explanations (this clearly isn't an rvs vote... but the reason is piss poor)
---As I said before, scum sometimes have difficulty genuinely interjecting themselves into a game.
In post 267, McStab wrote:Also for the sake of posterity in case my tinfoil hat theory starts looking plausible a Benmage-CDB-Nost scumteam works really well
I'm baffled at naming a 3 man scum team this early.
At first I thought the snide remark to Tammy in iso 1, was a form of buddying. I’ve had scum try and be cute to me in their first post.... The fact that he admits being snide in post 135 threw me a little bit..Though is overall lack of contribution led to my early suspicion, and wasn’t really alleviated until his recent posting which looks a lot better with actual apparent review.
In post 213, Benmage wrote:In post 203, petapan wrote:In post 197, The Mini-Librarian wrote:Not liking peta (not engaged in the game, coasting through)
i just have no idea what i'm doing
Can you link to a previous game where you felt that the game was above you? You have over 2300 posts on the site, and frankly I don't believe you.
**I want to take a look at the Shadow wagon, how it sprung up, the Nost hate and review Jason... But I have a meeting in about 30 mins.