Kublai Kahn (2): chamber, deathrowkitty
mith (2): KittyMo, katsuki
KittyMo (2): Fishythefish, Rhinox
Katsuki (1): mith
DeathRowKitty (1): Kublai Kahn
not voting (0):
This will not happen until KK either tries again or puts his fingers over his ears while yelling "I'm not listening".In post 199, Rhinox wrote:I was kinda hoping DRK was going to get to the point regarding #191.
In post 202, DeathRowKitty wrote:This will not happen until KK either tries again or puts his fingers over his ears while yelling "I'm not listening".In post 199, Rhinox wrote:I was kinda hoping DRK was going to get to the point regarding #191.
In post 201, Fishythefish wrote:
@Kat: what did you mean by "Sigh" in post 142? When you were voting panzer, and thought mith was scum with him, why didn't you mention your scumread on mith?
In post 168, DeathRowKitty wrote:
This is a really strange interpretation of what mith said. Can you point out where in mith's post you got each of those things from?In post 164, Katsuki wrote:So I can't have more than 1 scum read, and the strengths of these reads can't vary? You sure say some interesting things, mith.
In post 206, Katsuki wrote:In post 201, Fishythefish wrote:
@Kat: what did you mean by "Sigh" in post 142? When you were voting panzer, and thought mith was scum with him, why didn't you mention your scumread on mith?
When? Do you mean originally? I didn't express it then because I'm very weak as a town player, and while my reads are more often than not right, I'm generally unable to get my scumreads lynched. Especially in a game of this playerbase, I wanted to get panzer lynched, then be able to hammer mith lynch through D2 as there is no way I could stand toe to toe with mith D1.
tl;dr, I'd easily lose 1v1 with any scum in this game as my argumentative and language skills are very weak.
Also regarding reads, my panzer read was based off of my mith scum read + the things others were pointing out about panzers actions eg. the cheerleading on DRK. Mith was always the stronger scumread, I thought he was doing something I caught him doing in another game where he was scum.
In post 207, Katsuki wrote:Oh and the sigh was that this game is apparently not the easymode I thought it would be (aka easy mith panzer).
In post 215, Fishythefish wrote:Oh, and on coaching; if I see an attack I disagree with on somebody I'm leaning town on, I'm often going to counter it and/or ask questions to get them to say the right thing (the latter was most of the reason I asked Kat questions in 201 - I was nearly sure I knew what he was going to say on the important one). Particularly if I think there's a good chance they are going to make a hash of it for reasons which have nothing to do with alignment.
DeathRowKitty wrote:It doesn't seem implausible at all in my mind. Scum get night talk in normal games and mostly just discuss who they're killing. Do scum need communication to function during the day? Considering you're the second person to tell me (or heavily imply, in your case) that scum do get daytalk in nightless games, clearly I was wrong.
This isn't even to being a response to what I wrote. For one thing, it's practically responded toKK Response wrote:You've been here since 2009 and the only thing you've ever used night-talk is to discuss who to kill?
DRK wrote:What answer were you expecting out of that question that would have been useful?
In this quote, KK tries his hardest to one-up himself in failing to read anything I write and amazingly manages to succeed. I don't think that requires a drawn-out explanation and I don't think one exists beyondKK Response wrote:I'm pursuing this line of questioning because in post 103 you suggest that I'm scum because I'm "coaching" Panzerjager. I'm observing that you're doing something that I call "spaghetti-ing". You're throwing all sorts of bullshit to the wall and looking for something to stick.
DRK wrote:Here's where I initially said that I found you scummy. Tell me why at that point in the game I would decide I "wanted to read [you] as guilty" and why I would include an offer to give reasoning if I didn't actually have a reason.
I think I would find this post funny if I weren't legitimately angry right now. "Why would I offer to give reasoning if I didn't have a reason?" "You didn't have a reason." Smooth. Not only does this one fail to respond to what I said, it also fails at reading the post I linked:KK Response wrote:But you didn't have a reason. You had a gut feeling. You didn't try to follow up that gut feeling by asking me any questions, you just starting making misinterpretations to justify a desire to lynch. That is scummy behavior.
How did he get "you didn't have a reason" from "I could identify a couple quotes/patterns that lead me to that read"? Welcome to first grade reading comprehension; failures: Kublai Khan. Except he's not that stupid. He's not stupid enough to have actually failed at reading any of my post that badly.DRK, In the post he linked wrote:I'm not really liking KK. I'm going to be lazy and pin it down to gut for now, but I could identify a couple quotes/patterns that lead me to that read if anyone actually cares about it.
Yes KK, you are clearly following up on your gut read on me by asking me questions and ignoring the answers.Hypocrite Khan wrote:You didn't try to follow up that gut feeling by asking me any questions