^____^"
"We keep moving forward, opening new doors, and doing new things, because we're curious and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths."
― Walt Disney
In post 172, Xegarus wrote:Forgive me for not getting the point here, but are you trying to say that getting annoyed at being called a lurker is a bad thing?
In post 165, Xegarus wrote:
In post 135, Wisdom wrote:3) His tone when accused of lurking. Like bork said, this sounds like accused scum who is annoyed about the reasons that they're being accused; probably thinking "wtf I would be like this as town too".
Have already pointed out why i disagree with that.
Now lets just entertain the thought that this is how i would play for both alignments. Assuming you believe it, what then?
In post 165, Xegarus wrote:
In post 107, mothrax wrote:third was calling someone town. Correct me if I'm wrong but the object of the game is scum hunting, right? If you aren't doing that I don't see much contribution going on.
Sure that the way town wins is by getting rid of scum, but getting a town is just as useful as getting a scum read. I can't see your point here.
In post 151, mothrax wrote:I'm not a big fan of blatantly identifying all town reads no.
I agree.
In post 151, mothrax wrote:I think it gives scum a clearer picture of who to nk
Is that night kill or no kill?
If thats a night kill, then certainly. But it can help whomever got the read influence others.......assuming he isnt just scum with town cred.
If it was no kill, i dont quite understand.
In post 154, elvis_knits wrote:Well I was gonna say that I only see scum say that giving townreads is a bad idea, but actually... I think I have probably seen some town saying it sometimes. But really, I have seen it more coming from scum. Scum discourage acceptance of townies as being townies because then it narrows their pool of people they can lynch. Nevermind how powerful a townblock can be, as you said.
There is also the other argumant against giving reads that it changes how people play depending on the reads given. Like say you give a scum a town read. It could give them the confidence to bus their buddy and still end up on top.
In post 165, Xegarus wrote:
In post 139, elvis_knits wrote:I wanna go charging off and vote xegaras
Why?
You sure love mentioning me, you have yet to give a legitimate reason to vote. Why even mention this if you haven't read everything? It shows you already have a fixed mindset to an ideal and probably will interprete based around that ideal. Or you're scum. Your early play about being clueless to pre game theory looked so forced, as if to try and town slip.
xeg wrote:
Heck
In post 51, elvis_knits wrote:Xegaras #47 is slightly weird because he's defending majiffy's right not to random vote while he is also voting majiffy. But I guess it's just a random vote, so it's not super hypocritical to defend somebody you're random voting since random votes aren't that serious. Still... a bit odd.
WTF is this? This means absolutely nothing but you still mentioned it. Why?
xeg wrote:
Have you read everything yet?
Still feel the need to vote me?
e_k wrote:@ bork and Wisdom -- can you explain why you feel so confident that moth is town?
In post 165, Xegarus wrote:-_-
Wanna say anything about it or are you just sheeping Wisdom.
If you are sheeping Wisdom, STICK THAT UP YOUR FLOWCHART.
In post 177, elvis_knits wrote:In post 165, Xegarus wrote:
In post 135, Wisdom wrote:3) His tone when accused of lurking. Like bork said, this sounds like accused scum who is annoyed about the reasons that they're being accused; probably thinking "wtf I would be like this as town too".
Have already pointed out why i disagree with that.
Now lets just entertain the thought that this is how i would play for both alignments. Assuming you believe it, what then?
this is how i would play for both alignments
this is how i would play for both alignments
this is how i WOULD play for both alignments
...
You're not saying you're town.
You're saying you would play this way if you were town.
That's a problem.
In post 178, elvis_knits wrote:It seems like you're saying all different things on the topic of townreads.
First you don't see mothrax's point, and then you agree with him.
Which one is it?
In post 179, elvis_knits wrote:First of all, I did want to vote you based on my feeling you were scummiest so far (because you popped in immediately after being called a lurker -- and I pointed out that I didn't like this) but didn't want to without making sure I had thoroughly read everything
In post 179, elvis_knits wrote:And even after I read everything I didn't actually vote you -- so how did I interpret things with a fixed mindset??
In post 179, elvis_knits wrote:I actually have changed some of my opinions based on my through read (like the fact that i got less sure mothrax was town). My behavior actually disporves everything you're saying up there.
In post 179, elvis_knits wrote:And where was I clueless to pre game theory?? I never said I was clueless. I said I don't think scum try to prolong pregame, based on my experience that I never have, so I didn't think it was a tell.
And now you're trying to say I'm trying to fake a townslip? Wut? That's so scummy, man. First of all, I don't know where I have townslipped, or where you think I have, but if I did then why do you think it was fake? This seems like the most horrible scummy reasoning to try to throw doubt on a person that most people are thinking is prob town.
In post 179, elvis_knits wrote:I thought it was weird for you to vote a person and them defend them. Get it?
In post 179, elvis_knits wrote:YEs, and yes, but I think I will see what your response is to this first.
In post 181, borkjerfkin wrote:I support the Xegarus wagon right now -- 165 is a bad bad post.
In post 184, CityElectric wrote:And, with the risk of being accused of sheeping and all, I think I like the xeg wagon.
In post 184, CityElectric wrote:Super scum, I'd guess
Also, my reads are parrots of Majiffy's? Didn't notice.
And, with the risk of being accused of sheeping and all, I think I like the xeg wagon. Majiffy feels town.
In post 189, elvis_knits wrote:I really don't wanna play the wall post game with xegarus.
I think we both made our points.
I still don't like him.