In post 249, Wisdom wrote:How does that make you feel?
It make me feel sad in pants!
But I still haven't read like the last two pages so maybe there's a good reason.
In post 249, Wisdom wrote:How does that make you feel?
In post 189, elvis_knits wrote:I really don't wanna play the wall post game with xegarus.
I think we both made our points.
I still don't like him.
In post 191, borkjerfkin wrote:I concur
In post 198, mothrax wrote:I'm stating intent to hammer here.
In post 199, borkjerfkin wrote:It's pretty much everyone but you, elvis, and me.
In post 209, Pala wrote:Ok, maybe I'm going to show my noobish colors here, but it strikes me as a bad idea to be declaring intent so early in the game and potentially forcing a claim. So I'm going to go ahead and
UNVOTE:
with the understanding that I still find Xegarus scummiest so far in the game and will vote him again when the time comes.
In post 222, Majiffy wrote:And Mothrax would have to be the dumbest of all scums to hammer so early on when there is clearly more to be discussed.
In post 225, Pala wrote:Xegarus would claim prematurely
In post 248, elvis_knits wrote:Wait how does xegarus only have two votes wtf
In post 252, mothrax wrote:Omg ek! I'm drunk too' we should be drink friends. I've read like 50 pages if dolphin in the last two days! Also,
vote xeg
In post 254, mothrax wrote:But, ya know, read my posts. I've already answered the points you raised.
In post 198, mothrax wrote:I'm stating intent to hammer here. I will when the time comes but I have more to say before the day ends, just not when I'm phone posting. I also second the call for more CE posting.
In post 252, mothrax wrote:Omg ek! I'm drunk too' we should be drink friends. I've read like 50 pages if dolphin in the last two days! Also,
vote xeg
In post 183, mothrax wrote:Eroll: do you think xerg is scum?
If xerg is scummy for lurking (I know it's not the only point against him) what are people's opinions on CE?
In post 255, Pala wrote:@xeg - your vote on Bork is basically an omgus. What exactly is your case against him?
@mod - can you please prod Mr. E? Thanks
@moth - I don't recall seeing anything in your posts about xeg except for where you asked how the rest of us felt about CE given she was also short on content/posts. I will go back and see if I can find anything else after I've had some sleep as well.
In post 257, Xegarus wrote:In post 255, Pala wrote:@xeg - your vote on Bork is basically an omgus. What exactly is your case against him?
@mod - can you please prod Mr. E? Thanks
@moth - I don't recall seeing anything in your posts about xeg except for where you asked how the rest of us felt about CE given she was also short on content/posts. I will go back and see if I can find anything else after I've had some sleep as well.
FUCK YOU PALA YOU STUPID SITE BREAKING NINJA.
My vote against bork is because he very subjectively said something i did was scummy, hasn't said much about me since just that i'm scummy and refused to say anything relevant to the posts i have made.
He is just ignoreing what i am saying without the decency to correct me where i may be wrong.
If im so scummy to him, he should have no problem tearing my posts apart.
In post 210, Wisdom wrote:I find it interesting that elvis did not express that concern when I told her she still wasn't voting him. She simply ignored me and finally voted after two posts, without any concern for the early L-1.
In post 263, elvis_knits wrote:Like in my opinion the reason you unvote is that somebody does not seem scummy to you. You don't unvote or doubt a wagon because other people have started agreeing with you.
In post 259, borkjerfkin wrote:Uh yeah, the point of mafia is not to get people to admit they're being scummy or win an argument against them;
In post 259, borkjerfkin wrote:it's to get their suspects lynched, and pretty much everyone wants you lynched right now.
In post 259, borkjerfkin wrote:Having the "decency to correct you" is not an obligation nor goal of mine.
In post 259, borkjerfkin wrote:Still I'm wondering if you're voting me BECAUSE I'm not voting you -- looks less like OMGUS that way
In post 259, borkjerfkin wrote:and there are people taking a much more hardline stance against you without debating you into the ground.
In post 262, elvis_knits wrote:Xeg was saying how he doesn't like people giving ALL reads. I just find that anti-town coming from anybody
In post 264, borkjerfkin wrote:This is pretty null
In post 262, elvis_knits wrote:it was part of the reason I felt it was right to vote him.
Xegarus wrote:I'll tell you what, I'll unvote and you vote first before i vote again. Just to make it look more like an OMGUS. To answer your concern, no. I'm not voting you because you are not voting me. But i do wonder why you aren't voting me.
In post 268, borkjerfkin wrote:Seriously if you have to ask this, you're not paying any fucking attention.
In post 268, borkjerfkin wrote:Things I want to do
1) Get people's reads
2) Promote more interactions with the less involved players
3) Unstall the fucking game (get CE replaced?)
In post 268, borkjerfkin wrote:Things I don't want to do
1) Lynch you right now.
2) Get into a wall war with you. I'm sorry you don't think I'm explaining myself well to you but in the end I don't really care -- gauging your reactions to other things are more important than winning an argument.
In post 269, borkjerfkin wrote:If this lack of activity continues to deadline I'm just gonna sheep Majiffy.
In post 269, borkjerfkin wrote:If this lack of activity continues to deadline I'm just gonna sheep Majiffy.