Interesting points about post 540.
1. you don't mention Huntress like you claim you did (in fact the only time Huntress appears in your iso during that time is post 514 when you explain you are re-evaluating your reads and the next time the name appears is all the way in post 753) -
Lie much?
- oh wait, you will just say you were "mistaken" right? 2. You say in post 540 that veggie wasn't voting anyone which is also a lie as shown in the vote count in post 542 where vegie is absolutely voting someone, and I am pretty sure you know he is voting someone because in that very same post you accuse him of
"and it makes me think he is just trying to push through a lynch once and for all
If he isn't voting someone how can he also be trying to push a lynch through?Also why did you not vote Havingfitz? Thor even asked you why you thought fitz was town in post 541, but you never answered him. The fact that you mis-repped veggie (now confirmed town) only shows scum motivation not town motivation.
the fact that you claim you re-evaluated your reads and even claimed that you posted them in a post where you actually didn't, is not town motivated either. It's just bold face lying. You didn't re-evaluate shit.
I also want to point out this quote from you in post 514
if you HONESTLY felt that, why no pressure on havingfitz? Why question Thor's vote on havingfitz? why not join the Havingfitz wagon or at the very least QUESTION him?his Day Three opening post ("my suspect died, what to do?") which is something I think comes from scum more often than Town,
you have soft defended havingfitz for most of the game leading up to that point
post 238 - attack hiraki for voting havingfitz
post 254 - soft defending him by asking Hiraki why he isn't understaning havingfitz's posts
post 299 - sticking up for havingfitz cause you feel hiraki is attacking his grammar instead of substance
post 353 - defending yourself/hiraki/mert from mike's false accusation of TV
post 514 - you basically question both people voting havingfitz
post 575 - This is a weird comment "They are points to be made against you, but seeing as I have asked Thor665 to elaborate to see if there is a better case and I did not vote for you" (The reason why it is weird is you seem to have no problem putting Rach at L-2 yet you wanted a more concise case on fitz before you were willing to put him at L-2)
I see you defending a lot of other players still alive and attacking a lot of players who are all dead and were town.
vote: pj
everyone sheep me, scum found
