In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:
His early play was incredibly non-aggressive - asks questions and not attacking.
...okay? Remind me how this is scummy?
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:Then attacks TUA (Monday), vanishes Tuesday, comes back Wednesday with a flurry of posts:
Tries to tie Antilles to TUA, keeps pushing TUA, defends Marangal because she's being normal, doesn't lile Rach's comment, TAM is scum, Otterhorse is town, KBW is scum, Antilles is pretty scummy, tries to tie Marangal to KBW, says he likes Titan, light scum read on Serrapaladin.
*with the exception of Serra, he calls scum, scum, and defends town, calls town town and at worst calls town, pretty scummy.
Again, how is this scummy?
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:Despite pushing TUA hard before, takes a break to question Klick about his metal overlord scum read.
Is this going to be a huge wall post where I just ask "why is this scummy"?
I can do that, y'know, though it'd be fairly boring.
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:He says that he won't be happy until MO is lynched, despite the fact that they are sharing scum reads, and looking at it now, his reason at the time didn't seems all that great. He also didn't vote him immediately. I think this is scum exaggerating the strength of an argument against someone, failing to read someone rationally, and deciding to keep bussing for a bit, while what they had to say suggested they should change their vote.
Or I could have that magical thing called multiple scumreads.
People seem to be calling that out a lot as if that's super scummy when...it's really not.
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:Claims a scum read on Reek, just before DGB replaced in. After that consistently buddies DGB.
DGB towntold a lot when she replaced in. Strong townread =/= buddy.
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:The fact that he was attacking MO for voting TUA, but then voted TUA makes literally no sense.
Hm? Where was this? I agree with you that it makes no sense, probably because I never did it.
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:Despite several accurate scum reads on day one, at the start of day two he only pushes TUA.
Again, why is this scummy?
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:Pushes the Amished tell against MO, not against DGB (despite thinking reek was scum).
Amished Tell has a clause that says it doesn't work on females.
Didn't I mention this?
In post 3161, Zdenek wrote:Attacks Jen, doesn't vote her, but complains about the wagon falling apart.
I'm 75-80% sure I voted her, so I don't think this is accurate at all.
I do complain about wagons I'm not on falling apart that I think are on scumbuddies of the people I
am
voting though--maybe this was one of those games? Meh, memory's shot, don't care to look back.
Mastin reading 101: If he votes and pushes scum, he isn't scum.
TUA's immediate vote change to tug their vote straight off of Jennifer in the literal 10 seconds after they voted her struck me as dodging a bussing bullet though.
If you'd like to tell me why my scum self then proceeded to bus the two of them in succession, go ahead! I doubt it, though.