But if he's lynched and it's not him, and I would die before LyLo, I
Enomis is not scum. Syryana is not scum. Homertve is not scum.
In post 1002, Grimgroove wrote:I'm not sure if he checked the topic, but I know for a fact Majiffy was online during this endphase, so it is possible hechosenot to hammer.
pedit: Good!
In post 1016, Grimgroove wrote:Are you still the same enomis? your posting style seems to have changed considerably?
I'm reading enomis as town now by the way. His L-1 on Rach was crucial to getting her lynched, the alternative could have easily ended up in a stalemate with nobody the wiser.
Reading Core's posts he really seemed very intent on moving the wagon away from RachMarie and on to enomis. Core lost his strong townread.
Buit MAjiffy remains my number 1 suspect for the time being.
I think these posts summarize my thoughts on both lynch-candidates.In post 1041, Grimgroove wrote:"random" lurker? Are you seriously bringing that up again? Please don't offend, thank you, definitely if you haven't read the first 30 pages.
I still think Majiffy is the more obvious choice though. Look at his posts. He claimed toh ave a strong townread on her, yet never explained why. After some shenanigans at the end of the first daystage her read her a slight town. He called me "dumb as bricks" for believing RachMarie was scum. If anyone was defending her, it was him.
He was online during the end of the previous day. He posted in other topics at the time,b ut not here, choosing not to be seen, choosing not to hammer. He was hoping for a no lynch rather thans ee his buddy lynched.
That's my main hypothesis.
My second is Core being scum with RachMarie. He was too ambiguous during the moment of truth, pushing for an enomis-lynch and not hammering RachMarie despite intent.
It's one of these two.
My townreads on enomis, Syryana and homertve are too strong to even consider voting them. I really don't see enomis' elaborate plan coming from scum simply trying to stall, homer.
What do you guys make of Majiffy and Core yourselves?
what mistake cant i just play how i play the game does evolve as you learn new thingsIn post 1097, Grimgroove wrote:This is how I see it:
Core did one thing wrong: he did not include Majiffy in his theory of the triangles as possible scum, based on a flimsy argument that Majiffy was too much of a dick to be scum.
This was obviously a mistake, but how is it a scumtell?
No, I really don't see it.
Have you got anything else on Core? You do realize this is not enough right, even if it is 100 procent valid?
I want more people to share their thoughts on Majiffy. I have the impression that the mere fact he's being well, less than kind, makes him town. Along the lines of Core's thinking not to put him in the triangle. This is NOT enough.
I want to see more reasons why MAjiffy is town or why Core is scum before I even begin considering moving my vote.
Tell me one new thing you learn to make you suspect Majiffy.In post 1105, Core_H86 wrote:what mistake cant i just play how i play the game does evolve as you learn new things
Simple question: is it necessary to read the OP to read what the players in the game have said and done? This is a yes or no question.In post 1078, Grimgroove wrote:You did not know the set-up.
How can you not know the set-up if you read the game?
We were talking about a jailkeeper and you had no clue what that was all about, you didn't know a doctor had died earlier, an event that should leave a moment of pause that you have ignored.
You don't give two shits about this game and it is obvious. You probably even forgot to send in the night kill because you couldn't be bothered.
You toyed with the possibility that the doc assured the absence of a kill in N2. The doc died in N1.In post 1048, Majiffy wrote:Oh this setup is 2 of 4 so yeah we don't know if it was doc or jk that stopped the kill, or if mafia no killed (unlikely) altogether.
Setup spec is unlikely to help us here.
You toyed with the possibility of me being scum.In post 1114, Grimgroove wrote:You toyed with the possibility that the doc assured the absence of a kill in N2. The doc died in N1.In post 1048, Majiffy wrote:Oh this setup is 2 of 4 so yeah we don't know if it was doc or jk that stopped the kill, or if mafia no killed (unlikely) altogether.
Setup spec is unlikely to help us here.
From someone who thinks night kills are important for analysis, this comes as a surprise.
No shit.In post 1115, Grimgroove wrote:That said, I find Core's reply to the allegations and to the L-1 far too meek. We probably hit scum with that one.
I'm so sorry. I feel so stupid now. You're absolutely right.In post 1116, Majiffy wrote:You toyed with the possibility of me being scum.In post 1114, Grimgroove wrote:You toyed with the possibility that the doc assured the absence of a kill in N2. The doc died in N1.In post 1048, Majiffy wrote:Oh this setup is 2 of 4 so yeah we don't know if it was doc or jk that stopped the kill, or if mafia no killed (unlikely) altogether.
Setup spec is unlikely to help us here.
From someone who thinks night kills are important for analysis, this comes as a surprise.
Considering you knew that I forgot the doc had died, this comes as a surprise.
See, life is so much easier if you just listen to me in the first place.In post 1117, Grimgroove wrote:I'm so sorry. I feel so stupid now. You're absolutely right.
Let's lynch Core now and get this over with.