Baezu (3): Your Troubles Will Cease, rhyx, Salt n Pepper
waynegg (1): T S O
Titus (1): Baezu
Not Voting: Ten_Heavens, Titus, Marquis
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Deadline is Monday, August 5th at 9 PM Eastern Time.
In post 196, Salt n Pepper wrote:In post 193, Baezu wrote:It's actually funny how in all of my town games everyone always pegs me as scum. I guess I put off that vibe?How about in your scum games?
In post 232, Salt n Pepper wrote:Why do you think we're scum again?Quoting my one post (134) and completely misinterpreting it (in 162) doesn't count as a reason.
In post 234, Salt n Pepper wrote:My posts writtenIn post 233, Baezu wrote:Well, this post, for one. Why so defensive and aggresive?afteryou called me scum cannot count for reasons why I was scum when you produced your readlist LOL. They can confirm/intensify your read, but they cannot count at that point in time.
I don't really consider it aggressive to dismantle an argument that isn't there.
Are you gonna keep evading the question or what?
Do you think a slot changes alignment when it replaces out?In post 329, Titus wrote:@Salt and Pepper, I'd have to agree on Baezu as a scum suspect. He's voting me for something I have no control over which is rather suspect to me. It's better than the Troubles train at this point. I want to see a little more posting to finalize my opinion though.
No. I believe that when someone receives a rolecard when replacing in, they receive the card of the person they replace. What kind of question is that?In post 331, waynegg wrote:Do you think a slot changes alignment when it replaces out?In post 329, Titus wrote:@Salt and Pepper, I'd have to agree on Baezu as a scum suspect. He's voting me for something I have no control over which is rather suspect to me. It's better than the Troubles train at this point. I want to see a little more posting to finalize my opinion though.
A legitimate one...He's voting me for something I have no control over which is rather suspect to me.
So, this is DP right?In post 136, Salt n Pepper wrote:I don't like the Beetlejuice tell.
In post 250, Titus wrote:Her slot.In post 249, waynegg wrote:Interesting intro given it completely ignores the elephant in the room and instead shines a light on two other players, one with absolutely no reasoning. This coming from a slot that already looks scumitty scum scum. TH's disappearance is legitimately worrisome, but as a start Titus sure has glossed over a lot and done nothing IMO to get the stink off his slot.
Also waynegg, replacements aren't given a note saying why the other guy left. I can't really address why he left. All I can do is play the game with the information posted in the thread.
I already answered that. Someone voting me based on something I cannot control and the fact I answer that way is not a real reason at all. Go ahead an vote me if you think the guy before me was scummy but the fact that I can't explain what's happening with someone who I don't know isn't good rationale to vote me.In post 333, waynegg wrote:A legitimate one...He's voting me for something I have no control over which is rather suspect to me.
Then what's up with this? Why two opinions about a certain type of tell from the same player? The stream of consciousness here sucks.In post 216, Salt n Pepper wrote:For the record, the beetlejuice thing for me makes sense, but its not exclusive to scum players and youre using a tell applicable to long days in a game with 9 pages. Bad.
Sure it is. Since he read the slot as scum before you were ever here, he has plenty of reason to be voting you. The slot didn't change just because you replaced in. I'm null on you right now, but this caught my attention in a bad way and i wanted yo question it before i did anything else. Guess I should go back and look at the vote now.In post 337, Titus wrote:In post 250, Titus wrote:Her slot.In post 249, waynegg wrote:Interesting intro given it completely ignores the elephant in the room and instead shines a light on two other players, one with absolutely no reasoning. This coming from a slot that already looks scumitty scum scum. TH's disappearance is legitimately worrisome, but as a start Titus sure has glossed over a lot and done nothing IMO to get the stink off his slot.
Also waynegg, replacements aren't given a note saying why the other guy left. I can't really address why he left. All I can do is play the game with the information posted in the thread.I already answered that. Someone voting me based on something I cannot control and the fact I answer that way is not a real reason at all. Go ahead an vote me if you think the guy before me was scummy but the fact that I can't explain what's happening with someone who I don't know isn't good rationale to vote me.In post 333, waynegg wrote:A legitimate one...He's voting me for something I have no control over which is rather suspect to me.
And that's the whole point of a 1v1. Neither person has time to ref anything, so they have to be honest and in the moment. It's one of the easiest ways to prove someone town or scum. The fact you ducked out once in is suspect.In post 344, Salt n Pepper wrote:Wayne, you're making something out of nothing. My real life schedule certainly does not revolve around your every whim, even if you had setup the question adequately. Clearly you find me scummy for not voting Troubles, but to expect immediate responses like that is a little unfair in my opinion.
- pi