VitaminR PBPA:
First indicates that he's read the day's posts and that my claim "seems credible." Wants to read over everything before making decision.
Post 871: Doesn't like Glork's attacks on MC, but can't think of plausable reason for lack of N4 kill. First to bring up idea of MC as backup to Lieutenant (I think), and openly rejects Ensign-Doc possibility. Wants to talk things over first. Seems like even though he can't think of another reason for no N4 kill, he wants to talk things over and make sure he hasn't missed anything. Sensible stance, but not necessarily indicative of being pro-town.
Post 873: 1-2 (likely 2) scum; neutral about lynch/no-lynch -- Glork likely nightkilled, makes Kleb lynch more sound, last lynch difficult; indicates he has not been told of a roleblock (and claims Soldier in the process)
Post 889 -- agrees with dahen on Ensign-Roleblocker flavor. Isn't sure why MC would claim to be a roleblocker, though, instead of vanilla SM.
Post 903: Finds roleblock, one-shot NK immunity, and "something else" to be most likely explanations for no N4 kill; thinks MC may have been RB, backup, or doc -- strongly indicates that he thinks it's Backup rather than RB/Doc. This bothers me a little, as VitR seems to waffle between wanting to go after Klebian (and believing me) to thinking MC may have been an RB (which would indicate that he thought I was scum and wanted to lynch me) to going back to thinking that Ensign was non-RB.
Becomes increasingly convinced that PJ is right about Glork, but still bothered by lack of N4 kill. Wants to know PJ's thoughts on N4.
Post 926 is one with which I actually agree. I can see a case against Nightson/VitR for the general lack of contribution or willingness to step out and take a stance, but I don't really like PJ's attack.
I like the explanation in the second paragraph of
Post 936. PJ, did you ever address that point? If VitR is scum, then StD's near-lynch presents the exact same scenario which leads you to believe that VitR is
not
pro-town.
Post 971, he once again speculates on potential MC roles. He still seems likely against Doc or Roleblocker. He also once again asks PJ for "concrete" reasons to believe he is scum.
The one thing I'm getting from VitR is that he fluctuates a bit, especially with regards to MC's potential roles. I think that his defenses are appropriate given the nature of PJ's attacks. VitR seems to want to believe that my blocking of Klebian is responsible for the lack of an N4 kill, but he is unwilling to commit to a vote.