Right now I have two primary concerns.
One is with DMS, who's case on Taco seems really...out there. Even as a first time player, I could tell that his posts were a product of not knowing what was going on more than anything bad. Bitmap's backing on the case is kind of suspect too, though I'm still more worried with DMS using such a weak case to start a wagon.
Secondly, there's the situation with Taco himself. It looks like a very obvious case of someone not really knowing what they were getting in to, but that doesn't really speak to his alignment, and it sounds like something that
could
come from over-eager scum in the same boat. Definitely not suspicious enough to lynch him off of it, especially after that claim, but I'm not comfortable writing him off as town just yet. I realize this opinion could be seen as contradictory to my first point, but if this is what DMS and Bitmap were thinking, then they should have said that. The evidence they used was pretty lackluster imo.
Other than those two points, I have some minor things I'm thinking of.
Teedy's post strikes me as an odd thing to say, but his punctuation leads me to not take it too seriously. No real opinion here until we hear some more from him.
Taco, why did you switch your vote to DMS right after his post?
Bitmap, why did you lump Pie and DMS into Town? Okay, you said you liked DMS' case, but even if we ignore how bad it was, I don't see a reason to include Pie.
Dessew wrote:What? Why wouldn't you believe it at least for now? Also, voting inactive people is useless, he might not even going to post at all and get replaced, it isn't as rare in newbies as it should be.
I figured not dropping a vote on him counted as believing him for now? Since I would definitely push a lynch if I definitively thought he was lying. As far as voting inactives, I was hoping against hope, but as expected I have been let down.
Also @Dessew,
In post 55, Dessew wrote:...newbies tend to underestimate the differences between lynches, votes and random votes. Think about players who threaten others with voting them, although they explicitely state that they have no intention to lynch.
In post 58, Dessew wrote:Also: a wagon's purpose (unless random) is to lynch, analyzing after not lynching is just getting something outta the ruins.
I feel like these statements are mildly contradictory. It seems to me like you say in the first post that there is a significant difference between voting someone up and trying to lynch them, and even give an example of how players will use it to get information. But then you seem to imply that doing so is a bad idea? Seems like an odd thing to say, especially in posts that were so close to each other, so it makes me feel like I'm misunderstanding your point. Please explain.
So TL;DR I suppose
-Slightly suspicious of DMS and Bitmap
-Keeping an eye on Taco, but I'm okay to let him slide for now
-Not much of a read on anyone else. Looking forward to hear more from Rach, Teedy, and Pie.
No reason to keep my vote where it is, so I'll
UNVOTE: techking45
for now, but I'm not really happy with any of my other options, so I think I'll hang on to my vote for now.