In post 450, Empking wrote:
If people can't be bothered to read my posts, I can't be bothered to make posts for other people to read.
My posts are to ascertain alignments, but since nobody, in the entire game, has read enough of my posts to know why, for example, I find Bulb scummy; then I don't see how it'd be useful justifying any other read.
This is incredibly petulant, and still going off of the defensive vibes you've had for a while now. The bolded bit especially makes me cringe. People have been reading your posts, or else we wouldn't bother replying to you. Also, peoples' reads change over time. Why haven't yours? Plenty of new information has come up in the past few pages, and this is a new day, with reassessment of reads kinda required with Zekrom and RBDs flips being what they are.
In post 450, Empking wrote:
Kenobi - His posts this page were clearly looking for reasons to vote me rather than finding me scummy. Seriously, half his reasoning were just inane lies. The other half was for voting Tier without giving a reason, but Tier voting me with no reason was apparently incredibly unremarkable.
Wait, you mean I'm scumhunting rather than scumcalling? Gee, I'd've thought that was kinda the purpose of this. And the lies thing again? At least it's a new person that you're calling a liar this time. You're continuing to play reactively, and rather than bringing anything new to the table, you're going over the same old things again and again. This just reeks to me.
As for Tier, I'm going over his ISO at the moment, and while he's certainly not the cleanest of towns, he's certainly not particularly scummy to me.
p-edit:
In post 206, TierShift wrote:Cx, you didn't address RBD's request asking to elaborate on 196. Could you do so?
Aj seems town.
After seeing 203 I decided to reread on empking and he's been hugely slipping under the radar. 9 of his 12 posts are about addressing a case bulba made on him. He doesn't actually address anything at all, he just keeps saying bulba is wrong and the case is addressed. On top of that, he votes bulba for forcing, which he further doesn't explain. No scumhunting, nothing.
Survival tactics+not hunting. Scum.
Two scumreads atm, cx and emp.
There's at least a little bit of reasoning behind his jumping on the Emp wagon. So much for the "no reason".
Now, onto the whole Tier thing.
In post 425, TierShift wrote:That's an insanely good list, bulba. Only position I don't understand is pasch, why do you think he's scum?
Do you finally have a reason to vote me emp or am I still lying about everything or whatever?
@Tier, his list was good but he didn't really provide reasoning behind his reads, which is something that I was pulled up for on D1 (somewhere around page 15 I think).
In related news, Tier actually has been participating in multiple discussions, rather than constantly in this little reactive vendetta Emp's got going on. For example:
In post 425, TierShift wrote:That's an insanely good list, bulba. Only position I don't understand is pasch, why do you think he's scum?
Do you finally have a reason to vote me emp or am I still lying about everything or whatever?
And for you, Emp, an example of Tier not being entirely focused on you, as you seem to think he is.
In post 371, TierShift wrote:Everyone was calling out cx to be town and unvoting so I thought thw lynch wasn't happening. Still very interested if the concensus on that
willingness
to selfhammer changes.
I'd rather not PL either if we can lynch emp or cx but everything is better than NL.
TL;DR:
@Tier: Can you reiterate and add to your reasons behind your Emp/Cx reads?
@Emp: Pick up your game; petulance and defensiveness aren't going to get you anywhere except maybe lynched.
@Everyone else: thoughts?