Hold on, I still see a problem with that quote. He was giving Zekrom a vig target in bold saying that he knew Gooner was scum, but he wasn't serious? That doesn't seem right. It can't think of a scum motivation for it, though.In post 1679, Yates wrote:Yes.In post 1672, Green Crayons wrote:Is Page 41 (where Nikanor's Post 1023 is found) from Day 1?I realize that now. I was thinking that was from day 2. Just realized in my response to GC it was still Day 1.In post 1673, PeregrineV wrote:This doesn't make sense, Yates.
Meh. I still don't like him and don't have a better vote.
NY 171: An Education in Telling Jokes (Game Over!)
-
-
tman2nd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 16, 2013
-
-
pirate mollie thingmaker
- thingmaker
- thingmaker
- Posts: 18584
- Joined: September 5, 2012
-
-
tman2nd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 16, 2013
You say as you post garbage...In post 1698, Ythan wrote:Not posting is better than posting garbage.-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
-
-
tman2nd Goon
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
This is an observation that I, too, had. I'm not quite sure why Yates is back peddling and/or doubting his original suspicion.In post 1700, tman2nd wrote:
Hold on, I still see a problem with that quote. He was giving Zekrom a vig target in bold saying that he knew Gooner was scum, but he wasn't serious? That doesn't seem right. It can't think of a scum motivation for it, though.In post 1679, Yates wrote:
Yes.In post 1672, Green Crayons wrote:Is Page 41 (where Nikanor's Post 1023 is found) from Day 1?
I realize that now. I was thinking that was from day 2. Just realized in my response to GC it was still Day 1.In post 1673, PeregrineV wrote:This doesn't make sense, Yates.
Meh. I still don't like him and don't have a better vote.
As an aside, tman2nd has generally voiced opinions that I have held, and therefore I believe him to be town."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
serrapaladin Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5336
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Location: Somewhere in Europe
Not quite. What bothers me about you are throwaway comments like "What am I even reading? I'm taking a break." in 907, and posts like 1148 where you just describe why someone is wrong and somehow translate that to a potential scumread, without considering scum or town motivation. I know you know that scum don't have a monopoly on being wrong.In post 1638, Yates wrote:
Hogwash. I'm not going to self-meta but I disagree. I also disagree with your assertion that I'm not taking a stand in *this* game. PLUS, you are accusing me, of essentially this, yes?In post 1623, serrapaladin wrote:Both times, actually, and in your town games, there was significantly less content which was just filler calling people wrong without saying anything about their alignment.
So you are trying to claim that I'm scummy for doing something I'm calling a scum tell as if I wouldn't know? Whu? I'm not sure what your game is here, but you aren't making sense. And the fact you should know how to read me by now is more than a little disconcerting.In post 907, Yates wrote:Also a special scum point for Gooner for this unnecesary theory post. This is an up and coming reliable scum tell for me - easy way for scum to look like they are contributing while not actually taking a position on a person or argument.
In rereading you in ISO, my bigger concern at this point is your hedgey [http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 2#p5703842]post 1446[/url] where you tried to pretend you were for a Zek lynch in 1445 then immediately backed out in the span of 19 minutes because... "paranoia?" Explain, please.
Bottom line: I'm voting you or Nik today. I feel more confident in my Nik-scum read because I admit to some confirmation bias on my Serra-scum read but - you know - "paranoia."
As to zek, I initially unvoted just to make sure he wasn't quickhammered, but I also held some reservation about zek being scum just because of cabd's cc.
Explain to me your reasoning about nik and his post from yesterday. Whether or not you've forgotten when nik posted that, what scum motivation would nik have for that post?
I don't want to lynch marquis, but pere's recent posts are making me consider voting there. Also Elyse.Wandering but not lost-
-
Yates Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5119
- Joined: October 12, 2011
- Location: In your closet. In your head.
I had stronger opinions before the post loss. There's something missing now and I can't remember what I saw. So yeah. I'm a little annoyed. I've also got 3 or 4 people I would vote and there was... something... I didn't like about Nik from a post that got deleted and I just can't remember what it was but that's what really got me onto Nik-scum. So I have an opinion - I just can't substantiate it as well as I want.In post 1686, Untrod Tripod wrote:then get the fuck on with it. sooner or later you're going to have to have opinionsComing soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in-
-
Yates Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5119
- Joined: October 12, 2011
- Location: In your closet. In your head.
How do you distinguish between that and scum looking for town-cred? Serious question and not facetious.In post 1692, Elyse wrote:Marquis is reading more as frustrated town who is impressed with his Day 1 play and does not understand why others don't see it.
Initially, I thought I had that marked as him possibly faking a scum result. Seems way less likely to be a faked result if it was day 1. You see where scum have motivation to fake a result had that been D2.In post 1706, serrapaladin wrote:Whether or not you've forgotten when nik posted that, what scum motivation would nik have for that post?
The part that remains *kinda* scummy is the directing a vig thing. It is, however, less scummy since the motivation is just as likely because Cabd was a 2nd scum suspect as because he is scum trying to target town. I still subscribe to the theory that being wrong =/= being scum. Motivation is key.Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in-
-
Yates Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5119
- Joined: October 12, 2011
- Location: In your closet. In your head.
I finally see what you are saying. You realize I'm a replacement player, right? 907 was my 1st content post - and I hadn't even finished reading the 900+ posts from before I replaced in. Ditto 1148 - I'm still trying to get caught up at that point. I'm sure I'm missing a bunch of crap but I actually never finished reading day 1. And frankly I'm not going to at this point. *shrug*In post 1706, serrapaladin wrote:What bothers me about you are throwaway comments like "What am I even reading? I'm taking a break." in 907, and posts like 1148 where you just describe why someone is wrong and somehow translate that to a potential scumread, without considering scum or town motivation.Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in-
-
Marquis Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11342
- Joined: June 23, 2013
- Location: EST (–5)
hi i am looking for towncred and sheeping my townreadsIn post 1708, Yates wrote:
How do you distinguish between that and scum looking for town-cred? Serious question and not facetious.In post 1692, Elyse wrote:Marquis is reading more as frustrated town who is impressed with his Day 1 play and does not understand why others don't see it.link in bio-
-
Marquis Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11342
- Joined: June 23, 2013
- Location: EST (–5)
actually i at least sympathize with thisIn post 1707, Yates wrote:I had stronger opinions before the post loss. There's something missing now and I can't remember what I saw. So yeah. I'm a little annoyed.link in bio-
-
Desperado Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12582
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Location: Raleigh, NC
-
-
RadiantCowbells He/himSmooth CriminalHe/him
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70855
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Pronoun: He/him
-
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 1713, RadiantCowbells wrote:The thing is I had a heavy scumread outside of UT before the info got erased and now I'm just trying to figure out who it was.
VOTE: UT for now.
What was your heavy scumread based upon?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.-
-
DeathNote Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: July 13, 2009
- Location: Texas
Seriously? The five or so pages that we are missing really screwed up your reads that bad?In post 1713, RadiantCowbells wrote:The thing is I had a heavy scumread outside of UT before the info got erased and now I'm just trying to figure out who it was.
VOTE: UT for now.Looking for love in Alderaan places.-
-
RadiantCowbells He/himSmooth CriminalHe/him
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70855
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Pronoun: He/him
-
-
Untrod Tripod Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Posts: 11652
- Joined: September 1, 2003
Found itRadiantCowbells wrote:Someone was calling someone else scum in an insanely scummy half-assed way.
Remember anything like that?RadiantCowbells wrote:The thing is I had a heavy scumread outside of UT before the info got erased and now I'm just trying to figure out who it was.
VOTE: UT for now.-
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I meant your UT scumread. I remember nothing that does not exist.In post 1716, RadiantCowbells wrote:Someone was calling someone else scum in an insanely scummy half-assed way.
Remember anything like that?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
@serra
You keep mentioning that I might be scum at the end of a sentence like it's an afterthought. It looks to me like you are keeping your options open because you haven't actually provided a reason for me as possible scum.
@Yates
I just get that vibe from Marquis. I don't really know how to explain it. You could certainly be right that he's scum expecting towncred, but him blatantly asking for it makes me think he's just frustrated town because I don't think scum would be that open about it.
@whoever asked for my PerV read
His paranoia of me seems genuine, I've played with him as town and scum and this reminds me of his towngame, and I understand his reads progression and it seems logical.-
-
pirate mollie thingmaker
- thingmaker
- thingmaker
- Posts: 18584
- Joined: September 5, 2012
-
-
pisskop Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 31779
- Joined: November 14, 2013
Prodding hurts. I think Ill dig about tomorrowish.beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop.
Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.-
-
Porochaz Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Posts: 9317
- Joined: September 6, 2007
Im ill atm so my activity is going to be rough(er). Basically, Mala has shown little interest in the game (I know you are ill atm.) but the post quoted at the time really hit me as off. I made a post about it -In post 275, Malakittens wrote:I think Zekrom is an easy bait at this point. He's pretty damn new.
Also Marq:
How can you tell the difference between stalling scum and inexperienced players?
See.In post 289, Porochaz wrote:
Hey min, let us do some scum hunting, alrite?In post 275, Malakittens wrote:I think Zekrom is an easy bait at this point. He's pretty damn new.
Also Marq:
How can you tell the difference between stalling scum and inexperienced players?
The fact is he hasn't done much, I want him to place an opinion on something. I am not advocating a wagon on him, I have not put my vote down. That said, those who have done have every right to do so. He is clearly stalling and by nullifying pretty legitimate reasoning with "oh, but he's new, give him a break" is pretty scummy.
Now that he has flipped scum, your post looks extremely awful.
Post 414 as well.
Is your next post I find offensive, the half hearted defence throughout the day is gone and suddenly "SCUMREAD... but I don't want to vote..."In post 1326, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: Mollie
Serious vote.
You remind me of Shos when he discredited every single one of my crumbs in OGM. Shos was scum;therefore you are scum by default.
Also;
I think I'm down for a Zek lynch, but not voting because not many people have posted and I don't want a quick lynch to end this day off, tbh.
Then there is still the fluff posting etc.
vote malakittens
Found scum here guys. Please vote accordingly.Mostly retired. Unless you ask or it's something interesting.-
-
Porochaz Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Posts: 9317
- Joined: September 6, 2007
-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Got the prof. I'll be in tomorrow for sure, it's spring break so I think I have time for this nowI play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.