NY 171: An Education in Telling Jokes (Game Over!)


User avatar
Porochaz
Porochaz
Oh, Prozac
User avatar
User avatar
Porochaz
Oh, Prozac
Oh, Prozac
Posts: 9317
Joined: September 6, 2007

Post Post #1900 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:28 am

Post by Porochaz »

(Also I wanted to hammah)
Mostly retired. Unless you ask or it's something interesting.
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
User avatar
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
Fat and Sassy
Posts: 11652
Joined: September 1, 2003

Post Post #1901 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:56 am

Post by Untrod Tripod »

I'm gonna be honest, if she honestly is a town encryptor who gives daytalk to any groups that could have it

lynching her would hurt scum

and she's been a useless lurker
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1902 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:26 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1901, Untrod Tripod wrote:I'm gonna be honest, if she honestly is a town encryptor who gives daytalk to any groups that could have it
I don't even know what her role claim means, but I definitely don't understand this mechanic.

Explanations, please.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1903 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:29 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1854, Yates wrote:
In post 1848, Green Crayons wrote: (2) Why should we think a Mala mislynch would be easier?
2 - A mislynch on a prod dodger IN GENERAL [ie. not just because it's Mala] is typically pretty easy in lieu of a solid scum suspect or lead.
I'm confused. Are you saying that this general rule is applicable here?

In post 1854, Yates wrote:
In post 1848, Green Crayons wrote: (3) So if Elyse's point is a good one (your words), and you're claiming that you're pretty much the only person who she could be talking about in making her point, why shouldn't we lynch you tomorrow if Mala flips scum? If Mala flips town, why isn't your observation a duplicitous, self-serving statement -- that is, you were the lone voice of reason speaking out against the misguided Mala-wagon?
3 - If she flips scum I'm sure I'll be lynched tomorrow so I'll worry about that if she flips scum. If she flips Town I don't care if you think my observations were "duplicitous" or "self-serving" so long as my actions enable me to figure out who the scum driving the wagon is. I note that you phrased this as a "heads I win, tails you lose" sort of question. Were you aware of this when you were typing it out?
I found your post suspicious, and then deduced that it is suspicious regardless of how Mala flips. I think more scummy if she were to flip scum, but still scummy if she were to flip town.

In post 1854, Yates wrote:
In post 1848, Green Crayons wrote: (4) Why are you voting Mala?
4 - Lack of options in a game with marginal activity and 1 day left.
Cop out answer. Who would you rather lynch instead?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
User avatar
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
Fat and Sassy
Posts: 11652
Joined: September 1, 2003

Post Post #1904 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:33 pm

Post by Untrod Tripod »

In post 1902, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1901, Untrod Tripod wrote:I'm gonna be honest, if she honestly is a town encryptor who gives daytalk to any groups that could have it
I don't even know what her role claim means, but I definitely don't understand this mechanic.

Explanations, please.
The encryptor is passive and won't be blocked or stopped unless I die. I give daytalk to anything that needs daytalk. (Don't even start any role speculation because we don't need unncessary claims.)
read the motherfucking thread etc.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1905 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:37 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1904, Untrod Tripod wrote:read the motherfucking thread etc.
In post 1902, Green Crayons wrote:I don't even know what her role claim means, but I definitely don't understand this mechanic.

Explanations, please.
You first. You jackass.

I don't understand what her role means.

"I give daytalk to anything that needs daytalk." What does that mean? What is a thing that "needs daytalk"? As far as I know, nothing needs daytalk.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
pirate mollie
pirate mollie
thingmaker
User avatar
User avatar
pirate mollie
thingmaker
thingmaker
Posts: 18584
Joined: September 5, 2012

Post Post #1906 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:43 pm

Post by pirate mollie »

scum, masons, neighbors, etc
whew!
User avatar
pisskop
pisskop
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
pisskop
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 31779
Joined: November 14, 2013

Post Post #1907 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:44 pm

Post by pisskop »

Can we lynch her or move on to one of:

Marquis
Nikanor
UT

???
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop.
Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
User avatar
pirate mollie
pirate mollie
thingmaker
User avatar
User avatar
pirate mollie
thingmaker
thingmaker
Posts: 18584
Joined: September 5, 2012

Post Post #1908 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:45 pm

Post by pirate mollie »

we are lynching her I am waiting for notty before I hammer
whew!
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
User avatar
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
Fat and Sassy
Posts: 11652
Joined: September 1, 2003

Post Post #1909 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:45 pm

Post by Untrod Tripod »

trying to push me as a lynch candidate is laughable
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
User avatar
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
Fat and Sassy
Posts: 11652
Joined: September 1, 2003

Post Post #1910 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:46 pm

Post by Untrod Tripod »

what are you waiting on him for? ain't nobody going to nightkill him.
User avatar
pirate mollie
pirate mollie
thingmaker
User avatar
User avatar
pirate mollie
thingmaker
thingmaker
Posts: 18584
Joined: September 5, 2012

Post Post #1911 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:51 pm

Post by pirate mollie »

cos I want to get a read on him.
whew!
User avatar
DeathNote
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4913
Joined: July 13, 2009
Location: Texas

Post Post #1912 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:53 pm

Post by DeathNote »

In post 1868, Marquis wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: notscience

for being pacman and not seeing me as obvtown when he knows better by now
dont hammer please, looking something up that I want to post in thread before day ends.
Looking for love in Alderaan places.
User avatar
DeathNote
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4913
Joined: July 13, 2009
Location: Texas

Post Post #1913 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:53 pm

Post by DeathNote »

Oh... sorry, I had quoted that last post because I was wanting to say this was relevant to my interests.

DONT HAMMER YET
Looking for love in Alderaan places.
User avatar
DeathNote
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4913
Joined: July 13, 2009
Location: Texas

Post Post #1914 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:55 pm

Post by DeathNote »

In post 1104, Nikanor wrote:a) i doubt that zekrom25 is anything but a town vig. the only exception i can think of is if the scum have daytalk and coached him into making that claim when he did.
b) i doubt that marquis is anything but town, period. seriously, why are people voting him?
Ok found it.

This post looks hella scummy to me right now based on what Mala claimed and what she flips. Just wanted to point it out before day ends.

Hammer away.
Looking for love in Alderaan places.
User avatar
serrapaladin
serrapaladin
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
serrapaladin
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5336
Joined: December 28, 2012
Location: Somewhere in Europe

Post Post #1915 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:08 pm

Post by serrapaladin »

Pesky prods. Nika looks incredibly bad for leaking daytalk knowledge. I think that means mala isn't scum, at least not with Nika. Further, if mala is a scum-encryptor, I wouldn't expect her to also enable daytalk for other QT's, so that'd be a strange thing for her to add.

I'd be more comfortable with this for today:
VOTE: Nikanor
Wandering but not lost
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
User avatar
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
Fat and Sassy
Posts: 11652
Joined: September 1, 2003

Post Post #1916 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:10 pm

Post by Untrod Tripod »

holy shit serra that was awful
User avatar
pirate mollie
pirate mollie
thingmaker
User avatar
User avatar
pirate mollie
thingmaker
thingmaker
Posts: 18584
Joined: September 5, 2012

Post Post #1917 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:15 pm

Post by pirate mollie »

ut we are so in tune this game it is scary

NOTTY I AM LOSING PATIENCE
whew!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1918 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:24 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1906, pirate mollie wrote:scum, masons, neighbors, etc
Alright. I'm guessing such roles aren't told that their daytalk ability is conditional.

-----
In post 1859, Malakittens wrote:
In post 1751, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1726, Malakittens wrote:So when were you planning on voting Zek -- as soon as Cabd posted? Why the Mollie vote in the meanwhile? Would you have preferred a Mollie-lynch over a Zekrom-lynch on Day 2? (It's not the lack of an insta-Zek vote that I think has some traction in terms of scumminess, but the fact that you decided to vote for another player.)
I was planning on voting Zek yes, but I was waiting for people to post. I can't go after another scumread in the meanwhile to see how she would act? Zek wasn't not getting lynched and he was priority. Sorry, but I rather have my voice go on Mollie while I'm waiting for others so they know it's there.
I see a difference in following up on suspicions of another player while an obv lynch is ongoing, and actively pursuing another player (via vote) in the face of an obv lynch. I know conflating the two makes your defense easier, but I don't think that's a valid position to take.

VOTE: Malakittens
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1919 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:24 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh, that quote box is messed up. The inside quote is me, and then the response is Mala.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
pirate mollie
pirate mollie
thingmaker
User avatar
User avatar
pirate mollie
thingmaker
thingmaker
Posts: 18584
Joined: September 5, 2012

Post Post #1920 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:26 pm

Post by pirate mollie »

Image

I wasn't ready yet.
whew!
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23082
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Haven Springs

Post Post #1921 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:00 pm

Post by notscience »

SORRY I KINDA FORGOT I REPLACED INTO A GAME TODAY

FUCK

/repent
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23082
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Haven Springs

Post Post #1922 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:05 pm

Post by notscience »

I'm sad now

SORRY MOLLIE
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23082
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Haven Springs

Post Post #1923 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:07 pm

Post by notscience »

In post 1868, Marquis wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: notscience

for being pacman and not seeing me as obvtown when he knows better by now
Oh, you're so eating rope tomorrow for this post
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
User avatar
User avatar
Untrod Tripod
Fat and Sassy
Fat and Sassy
Posts: 11652
Joined: September 1, 2003

Post Post #1924 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:08 pm

Post by Untrod Tripod »

glad we're on the same page notty

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”