In post 1979, emogirl123 wrote:Chevre and ABR interaction. Chevre bends logic to support ABR. Proof of this when he asked Zekrom to replace out when ABR v. NS was being played out, yet when ABR v kab was playing out, scum read out of thin air.
I don't think I have a good frame of reference for this. I'm guessing this is a bit of a hypocrisy tell. Can you clarify it any? Why was him asking Zekrom to replace out suspect?
In post 1979, emogirl123 wrote:Says yessiree dying incriminates ABR so much that he uses this as a reason for why ABR was not to be lynched. Not many people even mentioned yessiree's case for ABR. The case was ABR's push for emogirl. Chevre says this case holds so much validity that ABR is town and should not be lynched. Makes no reference to this while voting emogirl.
Well...I think the last sentence is mostly null. If he was fake setting up cases when scum in the first part, there's no particular scum benefit to forget to mention them again - which means scum or town he clearly just forgot about it. I don't think town is less likely to forget things.
Do you think scum would kill someone who suspected their scumbuddy and then open up a conversation about how it cleared them? I have to admit that strikes me as really unusual scum play. I would expect them to kill the town and then just stay quiet about the issue. Did he start the conversation, or did someone else? If he started it - I'd like to call him town.
In post 1979, emogirl123 wrote:Cherry picking quotes to build a case for emogirl and coasting with these points occasionally "compromising" with a lynch just to continue to coast defaulting to day 1 "emogirl" case.
Meh. I don't see you as blazingly so town that it's scummy to attack you, though I understand that mindset.
What's your take on Aegor and Rainbow?
In post 1981, Rainbowdash wrote:ABR didn't really start doing anything in relation to Slandaar until Slandaar attacked BS (who was really scummy).
Oh yeah? Example please.
In post 1981, Rainbowdash wrote:You didn't take much of a stance on the whole ABR/kab exchange from yesterday early on, then tried to get Bulb to vote kab (note him not taking that chance means Bulb is town), then when it was getting to a point where ABR was looking like the deadline lynch jumped on him.
Yeah...so...the start of the ABR wagon...no info from that, huh?
In post 1981, Rainbowdash wrote:but it seemed like you were trying to figure out if you could actually save ABR, and eventually decided to bus when you figured that you could not.
Have you ever seen me do that after starting a bus on a scumbuddy at any point ever?
I'm just curious why you think I would.
How?
In post 1981, Rainbowdash wrote:Again you are immediately trying to loop into making yourself look good with the ABR wagon too saying it was "good meta" when you ignored it again until late. If it was as good of meta as you are claiming, why didnt you vote him early instead of stalling, seeming to make passive pokes towards kab, and then caving about 24 hours to deadline? Most of your interactions with the wagons and comments about it today sound more like you knew he was scum but were not sure about how to play it.
Well...I would think it was fairly obvious that I didn't vote ABR right out of the gate because I was still getting a feel for the game and scumreading people. Once I got a scumread on him I voted it and presented the case pretty strongly and even discussed it with multiple people and even moved a fair shake of votes to ABR.
I will agree it didn't appear as though I 100% knew he was scum...that's because I'm town and I got to my conclusion via scumhunting.
Whether or not I had psychotic aggression in my push is immeterial to the value of my evidence. It was good evidence, it was one of the best made cases of the entire phase, and you're the one calling the case stupid. Whether or not I was 80% sold or 100% sold on my own case does not actually affect it to make it stupid. If that's what you're arguing then...wow. Just wow.
Is that what you're arguing here? That is was stupid because I had doubts and kept scumhunting other people even though I never stopped calling him scum?
Because if that's not what you're saying here...what are you saying here as far as the case not being good and, indeed, being stupid? Because that's a pretty bold statement.