NY 171: An Education in Telling Jokes (Game Over!)


User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2325 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 2:35 am

Post by Ythan »

wait for me :(
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2326 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

VOTE: Ythan
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2327 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:16 am

Post by Ythan »

The closer we get to the end the less I can chalk your tunneling up to being terrible at mafia.
User avatar
DeathNote
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4913
Joined: July 13, 2009
Location: Texas

Post Post #2328 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:25 am

Post by DeathNote »

In post 2326, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Ythan
Of all the votes... why?
Looking for love in Alderaan places.
User avatar
Marquis
Marquis
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Marquis
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11342
Joined: June 23, 2013
Location: EST (–5)

Post Post #2329 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:30 am

Post by Marquis »

VOTE: notscience
link in bio
User avatar
pirate mollie
pirate mollie
thingmaker
User avatar
User avatar
pirate mollie
thingmaker
thingmaker
Posts: 18584
Joined: September 5, 2012

Post Post #2330 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:33 am

Post by pirate mollie »

VOTE: notty
whew!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2331 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:40 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 2328, DeathNote wrote:
In post 2326, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Ythan
Of all the votes... why?
1. Display Posts By User: Green Crayons
2. Control + F
3. Type in: Ythan

Plus, Ythan's play in the previous day aligns with prior suspicions.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2332 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:41 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 2327, Ythan wrote:The closer we get to the end the less I can chalk your tunneling up to being terrible at mafia.
Mischaracterization. It's not "tunneling" when I have voiced suspicions of you in tandem with voiced suspicions about other players, and now that those other players are no longer alive, and you are still alive and still playing scummy, that I vote you.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2333 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:43 am

Post by Ythan »

Pacman sure was scum. Notscience probably is too.

VOTE: notscience
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2334 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 am

Post by Ythan »

In post 2331, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 2328, DeathNote wrote:
In post 2326, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Ythan
Of all the votes... why?
1. Display Posts By User: Green Crayons
2. Control + F
3. Type in: Ythan

Plus, Ythan's play in the previous day aligns with prior suspicions.
So this is not an actual response to the post
you moron
.
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2335 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 am

Post by Ythan »

In post 2332, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 2327, Ythan wrote:The closer we get to the end the less I can chalk your tunneling up to being terrible at mafia.
Mischaracterization. It's not "tunneling" when I have voiced suspicions of you in tandem with voiced suspicions about other players, and now that those other players are no longer alive, and you are still alive and still playing scummy, that I vote you.
You've voiced a willingness to lynch me, all by your lonesome, but I don't see anything that implies suspicion. Like words. Like the kind of things we start posting when lynches don't go our way once we've graduated from kindergarten mafia.
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2336 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:48 am

Post by Ythan »

So I'm literally reading your iso to try to prove to myself that you're not retarded

and failing. Explain your vote on me with like a big boy.
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2337 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:52 am

Post by Ythan »

In post 2332, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 2327, Ythan wrote:The closer we get to the end the less I can chalk your tunneling up to being terrible at mafia.
Mischaracterization. It's not "tunneling" when I have voiced suspicions of you in tandem with voiced suspicions about other players, and now that those other players are no longer alive, and you are still alive and still playing scummy, that I vote you.
Okay which of your suspects have died exactly?
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2338 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:08 am

Post by Ythan »

In post 709, Green Crayons wrote:• Ythan's fake dayvig strikes me as scummy.
Here you say my fake shot was scummy. Then we get all the way to
In post 1141, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1122, Ythan wrote:A suitable alternative is not one that is not as good. GC u r dumb.
Willfully obtuse Ythan is willfully obtuse.

-
You
think Formerfish is "obvious scum." (Post 1041.)
-
You
wanted obvious scum (Fish) lynched, or a "suitable alternative." (Post 1041.)
-
I
am saying sthar is scum, and have not subscribed to your Formfish is "obvious scum." At most, Formerfish's play on balance has been scummy, but far from "obvious scum." (Post 709.)
-
I
am saying that because I think sthar is a pretty good scum candidate, and because
you
yourself have acknowledged that sthar gave you the "heebie jeebies," (Post 1032)
I
think that sthar fits under
your
request for a "suitable alternative."

-----
In post 1123, Ythan wrote:Literally GC walled to make the point that another character "gave me the heebie jeebies" and that I should lynch them instead of scum. And has done shit else lately.
Is it possible for you to be more bad at being scum?
this post before you call me scummy again. And it's you arguing that a player who gave me the heebie jeebies was equally as good a vote as a player I was voting. Which is an idiotic argument in and of itself, but the important thing is that you jump to calling me scum. Bad scum, as if something in these posts was blatantly scummy? But I could not and can not see what you could be referring to. Elucidate me if you remember.
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2339 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:12 am

Post by Ythan »

Wooow it took forever to drag you onto those two scum lynches.
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2340 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:17 am

Post by Ythan »

Guys open Desperado's iso, ctrl+f green, start hitting enter and watch.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2341 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:29 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1822, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1794, Yates wrote:I also want to hear more out of Green Crayons and Elyse.
I find that I don't really have much to say at the moment. I want mala to respond to my post, and in the meanwhile I'm happy with my PeregrineV vote.


I'm happy to do a recap about my feelings about players. For ease of future reference, I'm even going to include a bold notation as to those who I would be comfortable lynching today.

2. PeregrineV: willing to lynch today for reasons stated in Post 1659. (
Happy to lynch.
)

4. DeathNote: I thought was scum for about the first half of D1, and now I find him neutral. Hasn't done anything exceptional since that point in time, which I think might be attributable to the blowup between him and UT right about when his posting seemed to drop off. That strikes me as discouraged town, rather than scared scum licking his wounds.

5. pisskop: no real read. I just wrote a snippet about some minor feelings I had towards pisskop, only to do a quick double check and realize that they were not about pisskop at all, but another player. This leads me to conclude that I have absolutely no feelings about pisskop.

6. Yates Matias*: no read

7. pirate mollie: town

8. serrapaladin OhGodMyLife*: I realized I didn't have a read on him and then realized I couldn't actually put even a personality with the name. 9 posts all game. Would lynch this lurker today. (
Happy to lynch.
)

9. Untrod Tripod XLAV: town

10. Malakittens: leaning scum. (
Happy to lynch.
)

11. Elyse: still town in my book.

12. Marquis: still town in my book. I've read the posts about people who think she's scummy, and they didn't strike me as solid enough suspicions to take the time and synthesize and think hard and deep thoughts about.

13. Nikanor: no read.

14. Ythan *: I feel like he's pulling a "I'm hot shit" gambit and the only one who is noticing that it isn't working (and shouldn't be, because Ythan hasn't exactly delivered this game) is tman. Would be happy to vote again. (
Happy to lynch.
)

15. Porochaz: still think he's town

17. evilpacman18 *: I would have been happy to lynch today -- I recall in my distant memory where EPM played more or less like he has this game (basic actively lurker scum template) and he was scum GF or something silly like that. Plus there were some pretty good suspicions thrown about earlier by another player re: EPM that struck me correctly. I don't know how I feel now that he's going to be replaced. (
Happy to lynch.
)

18. RadiantCowbells: leaning town. He's been pretty quiet with the occasional not particularly helpful tidbit, so I guess possible lurker scum, but he doesn't really strike me that way.

20. tman2nd: solid town

21. Green Crayons: me
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2342 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:32 am

Post by Ythan »

Is that all you're gonna say?
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2343 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:32 am

Post by Ythan »

Give me more of a reason than that I am hot shit.
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2344 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:35 am

Post by Ythan »

In post 2341, Green Crayons wrote:14. Ythan *: I feel like he's pulling a "I'm hot shit" gambit and the only one who is noticing that it isn't working (and shouldn't be, because Ythan hasn't exactly delivered this game) is tman. Would be happy to vote again. (Happy to lynch.)
What part of this is even supposed to justify your claimed suspicion?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2345 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:38 am

Post by Green Crayons »

That answers two of the points I could glean through all of your bluster.

You're basically taking a "I'm obviously and incredibly right, and my rightness stems from the fact that I'm obviously town, and therefore my townness and rightness is unquestionable and I'll barrage anyone who says otherwise was insults and sarcasm" tactic, and it looks like scum bluster.

I noted it in Post 1822, and it has continued since that time. Up to and including your interactions with Serra and about how everyone should be voting Serra lest they be True Newbies.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2346 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:41 am

Post by Ythan »

That's pretty dumb/not where I can imagine putting my vote in town-gc's shoes but as long as you're up front about it.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2347 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:43 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Either I'm right and you're scum or I'm wrong and have never been very good at this game. But it's my suspicion and I'm sticking to it.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Ythan
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

User avatar
User avatar
Ythan
She
Welcome to the Haystack

Welcome to the Haystack

Posts: 15158
Joined: August 11, 2009
Pronoun: She

Post Post #2348 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:45 am

Post by Ythan »

Good luck. <3
User avatar
DeathNote
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DeathNote
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4913
Joined: July 13, 2009
Location: Texas

Post Post #2349 (ISO) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:37 am

Post by DeathNote »

Not even going to bother with that shit storm.

Vote: NS


I can compromise on RC/Tman/Marq as well.
Looking for love in Alderaan places.

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”