In post 141, havingfitz wrote:In post 53, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:I think he actually believes his strategy is optimal. I really don't think he realizes our strategy is optimal and is trying to get us to do something suboptimal as scum. His proposal is completely alignment neutral.
Why would scum try to push the optimal strategy? They wouldn't. If you think he [Bulge] "believes his strategy is optimal," then he would be siding with those pushing what he would think was the suboptimal strategy. I.e. your accusations towards the Bulge support him being town.
This is about hayato, not bulge.
The "just two nights with no-kills" is because at the time people wrongly thought it was gonna break the game. Compared to that, two nights with no-kills IS weak.
"Attacking everyone who went after hayato" what game are you reading aronis?
#80 says hayato's EXAMPLE supporting his plan doesn't make sense, not his actual plan.
The thing fitz points to bulge being town is irrelevant to alignment pretty much. Did none of you think of scum saying "LETS DO THE OPTIMUM PLAN" for towncred?
I don't agree with bulge that it's a scumtell on hayato, and he seemed to be using the plan to call hayato scum, and JUST the plan.
...
Seriously, go read the game context as well as my iso.