In post 2613, OhGodMyLife wrote:chamber does a lot of talking about he isn't defending the people he keeps voicing concern about votes for etc
I've literally never voiced concern over CES votes.
In post 2613, OhGodMyLife wrote:chamber does a lot of talking about he isn't defending the people he keeps voicing concern about votes for etc
In post 2582, Patrick wrote:Votecount
Cogito Ergo Sum (6) -- Sotty7, Yosarian2, Bookitty, DrippingGoofball, mathcam, STD
VitaminR (2) -- undo, MrBuddyLee
DrippingGoofball (4) -- petroleumjelly, Porochaz, Green Crayons, OhGodMyLife
Sotty7 (1) -- SpyreX
Yosarian2 (4) -- Albert B. Rampage, VitaminR, chamber, Cogito Ergo Sum
OGML (3) -- chamber, DGB, Albert
Not voting:
17 alive, 9 to lynch.
VitR, Jun 22, 2014 3:08 pm wrote:chamber wrote:Detracting from the undo wagon would likely just end in DGB getting lynched, but he's a serious consideration for a later date now, I want to review his older play.
Yesssss.
VitR, June 19 wrote:I really don't think a DGB lynch is a good idea.
VitR, June 23 wrote:DGB, you should make posts like Post 1436 more often.
VitR wrote:The part that I agreed with Glork about was the second sentence, not the first. It was just saying that I too found undo's analysis a little too self-serving, not that I wanted to lynch him. I didn't really note it as particularly scummy in my own mind.
In post 2627, Porochaz wrote:but it's different from both his town and scum meta.
In post 2545, Green Crayons wrote:In post 1857, VitaminR wrote:I happen to know CES quite well and I feel like there are way more town tells in his play so far than usual. He stuck his neck out to make a case against you Day 1, which he wouldn't do as scum (I noted this at the time). He also very quickly read chamber as town Day 1, in the same way that I did, which makes me think we're approaching the game the same way. The way he has reacted to ABR's case on me I think also fits more with him as town, but I'm less certain about that tell.
In post 2515, VitaminR wrote:I defended them because I think they're town (still pretty sure about chamber,maybe less about CES), which comes from knowing them well.
What.
In post 2549, Yosarian2 wrote:You've made clear that you're voting for me because you don't like that I kept attacking you and didn't back down. Of course that's illegitimate.
And, frankly, I don't believe that I "didn't make sense to you"; I think I was speaking quite clearly, and I'm sure I made myself pretty well understood.
In post 2624, petroleumjelly wrote:The more I read the post the more it looks like it is written by scum:
In post 2319, VitaminR wrote:Vote: Sotty
I've agonized about this a little in my head, but I think it's the best option. I still think her play with regard to LML looked bad and her votes have largely been easy ones.
In post 2315, mathcam wrote:I'm very intrigued by Sotty's last few posts, which have all focused on how there's nothing for her to argue against. There's no "The wagon is wrong because..." or "A better wagon is blah because..." She even goes so far as to call the wagon unfair. Whether or not this is true, this does paint to me a slight picture of scum bemoaning being caught for circumstances out of her control, annoyed that she played the game carefully enough to have nothing to actually be attacked for, and yet got caught away. I'm sure this is partly me trying to retroactively justify the wagon, but it sounds pretty reasonable.
I sort of had the same feeling. I also don't really like how she's using the fact that ABR called my case poor without coming out and calling it that herself. Seems a little disingenuous. If you think it's poor, say so. If you don't, don't use it in your defense.
As I mentioned above, the "agonized" language does not seem genuine to me at all.
The formatting of the post is also interesting because VitaminR immediately separates out his own "agonizing" language by quoting mathcam so that his post ends up with a different emphasis. Much like how VitaminR may have been using Glork as a shield early in the game, he is now using mathcam's reasoning as a shield. It seems whenever VitaminR is voting a Townsperson he has to cite somebody else's reasons, but when he was voting for LoudmouthLee it was all himself. This suggests he wants the credit when go "right" and wants to be "led astray" by others' thoughts when things go wrong.
In post 2628, MrBuddyLee wrote:Poro, DGB, thoughts on VitaminR?
In post 2637, SpyreX wrote:Due to being blind in one eye I have tomorrow off yay so I'll be around.
In post 2640, chamber wrote:Right now I think I'm sad that we aren't lynching bookitty.
In post 2642, Bookitty wrote:In post 2640, chamber wrote:Right now I think I'm sad that we aren't lynching bookitty.
Right now I'm sad that you're on a wagon that apparently started after the last time I was able to check the thread on Sunday. You do know that we're on a deadline, right?
In post 2632, VitaminR wrote:What's your problem? All the stuff I list there is about Day 1 and he's been kinda absent since then. I still think he's town, but I'm no longer absolutely confident of it (I've also been wrong a lot, something has to be wrong somewhere).
In post 2644, Green Crayons wrote:I think CES has been consistent the entire game in how he's playing, and so I don't see what basis you would have to change your opinion on him.