In post 2949, Rogue wrote:Anyone answering or commenting on the above before he does gets lynched.
You know this just makes me want to answer AND comment on it, right?
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
In post 2949, Rogue wrote:Anyone answering or commenting on the above before he does gets lynched.
In post 2948, Rogue wrote:Snowstorm, give me a case why you're town.
In post 2942, Titus wrote:In post 2939, borkjerfkin wrote:I seriously have no idea how this is supposed to be pertinent to whether or not snowstorm is scum
Nothing Feu said regarding Emma was relevant to Snowstorm, who still is scum with Eek.
Feu seems convinced that the HHC is in the game... and then blames it on Flavor research... right...
In post 2951, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2948, Rogue wrote:Snowstorm, give me a case why you're town.
-I'm being attacked by scum, which I can tell by knowing the points made against me are false and are being presented as if they had any validity. It's all show and no substance.
-I've been making my own reads and I do so by thinking for myself and evaluating the people's motivations behind their words and actions. I'm not just randomly calling people town or scum for no reason.
-My own words and actions are made with my win condition in mind, which is to eliminate all threats to town, as per my role PM.
In post 2952, Feu et Vol wrote:In post 2942, Titus wrote:In post 2939, borkjerfkin wrote:I seriously have no idea how this is supposed to be pertinent to whether or not snowstorm is scum
Nothing Feu said regarding Emma was relevant to Snowstorm, who still is scum with Eek.
Feu seems convinced that the HHC is in the game... and then blames it on Flavor research... right...
Everything I have said can easily be read on that wiki. You can't twist me trying to do something besides tunnel you as scummy no matter how hard you try. The best you have is a tin foil hat theory that would only hold any water if Emma actually flips in this game.
-Beast
In post 2953, Titus wrote:In post 2951, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2948, Rogue wrote:Snowstorm, give me a case why you're town.
-I'm being attacked by scum, which I can tell by knowing the points made against me are false and are being presented as if they had any validity. It's all show and no substance.
-I've been making my own reads and I do so by thinking for myself and evaluating the people's motivations behind their words and actions. I'm not just randomly calling people town or scum for no reason.
-My own words and actions are made with my win condition in mind, which is to eliminate all threats to town, as per my role PM.
Every read you've had has literally been said by someone else for the same reasons. That's not "thinking for yourself".
The wagon on you has been townie.
The last is a self-vouch.
In post 2959, Titus wrote:
Toog --- Parrotted from me
Titus --- Parrotted from just about everyone
I can compare your reads to mine. If they match, you're right. If they don't you're wrong. That is unless you elaborate like Majiffy did.
Everyone who has ever voted you for a significant period of time, I have a townread on. Majiffy, Rogue, all of them all town.
In post 2961, SnowStorm wrote:If you can't back up your accusations and explain them, they have no validity.
In post 2962, ika wrote:In post 2961, SnowStorm wrote:If you can't back up your accusations and explain them, they have no validity.
nor do you? your reads are shit, i think you arent thinking for yourself, even if you are it doesnt mean you are town
In post 2965, Titus wrote:Snowstorm, ika doesn't play on logic. If you are town (which I doubt) ika is an asset because he doesn't try to play logically.
Also, I'm hardly straight up horrible. I'm one of the best endgame players there is. Just getting through the early game is the hardest part. Doubly so because scum want me dead by hook or by crook.
I also didn't want to see you as scum, but I was persuaded. It's hard to persuade town me of anything.
You can do ad hominem attacks but that doesn't make them true. I'm damn good as town because I've had scum vote park on my wagon for days and nothing.
This makes sense if the plan is to lynch me. Scum don't want the objectives, they push electing Eek. Then they push lynching me. If we suppose a nullslate on who is scum, you should look there in your neighborhood. Is there anyone who fits that bill?
Titus wrote:Is there anyone in your neighborhood who was pushing to nominate Eek and then quickly began pushing my lynch?
In post 2967, Titus wrote:Yeah, sudden reversal on my being scum and a policy lynch 120 pages in. It makes the game "more pleasant" when townies go down without a fight. Well I'm going to fight. I'm frustrated to no end by your obviously bullshit claim and that all the other wagons on scum apparently topped out at three despite Feu and Mollie being obvious buddies. Venmar ain't getting lynched despite him playing solely to a scum wincon. Nero's pulling the same flip flop policy lynch got no other shit. ika is voting me because that's what he does every damn game.
In post 2971, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2967, Titus wrote:Yeah, sudden reversal on my being scum and a policy lynch 120 pages in. It makes the game "more pleasant" when townies go down without a fight. Well I'm going to fight. I'm frustrated to no end by your obviously bullshit claim and that all the other wagons on scum apparently topped out at three despite Feu and Mollie being obvious buddies. Venmar ain't getting lynched despite him playing solely to a scum wincon. Nero's pulling the same flip flop policy lynch got no other shit. ika is voting me because that's what he does every damn game.
My reversal is not nearly as sudden as yours.I don't think I have actually called you scum, I'm simply just not town reading you the way I was and I'm tired of you. And I'm not the only one.
See what I say about ika, that last sentence should tell you how bad he's playing. Voting out of habit is not logical, is not intuitive, it's brainless and it doesn't contribute to the town wincon.