In post 6022, Rogue wrote:Confirmed scum in a group of 1
Let's not be hyperbolic.
It was scummy.
He's not confirmed scum.
In post 6022, Rogue wrote:Confirmed scum in a group of 1
In post 6026, Venmar wrote:MY GROUP ALREADY HAS A FUCKING SCUM FLIP, I CANNOT BE SCUM, SNOWSTORM IS THE ONLY ONE LIKELY ENOUGH TO BE SO
I'm not fucking scum.
In post 6024, SnowStorm wrote:What about traitors?
In post 6029, Venmar wrote:In post 6024, SnowStorm wrote:What about traitors?
Traitors don't really make sense in Multiball, there would have to be two, one for each team, for it to be balanced for both teams too.
In post 6033, borkjerfkin wrote:
3 Town,1 Red,1 Blue
3 Town,1 Red,1 Blue
4 Town,1 Red
4 Town,1 Blue(X-ternals)
This was my hypothesis earlier. I'm in the 1 blue only hood.
In post 6034, Venmar wrote:The 3v3vTown setup has nothing to do with the Bus Driver theory though, at least not in my world.
In post 6038, SnowStorm wrote:In post 6034, Venmar wrote:The 3v3vTown setup has nothing to do with the Bus Driver theory though, at least not in my world.
It does. The bus driver theory can only be true if he had another living partner. And it's the only theory that points to 3v3vtown, otherwise, most evidence seems to point at 2-man scum teams.
In post 6037, Venmar wrote:Right, because that makes sense from my PoV.
In post 6047, Venmar wrote:i'm just being conveniently setup
In post 6002, borkjerfkin wrote:Desp: hypothetical:
Player A Redirects Player B (who was going to visit player C) to player D instead.
Player E tracks Player B and is not interfered with.
What result does Player E get?