Your Idea Mafia 2! Day 1 9/9

[Anatole Kuragin]

VOTE: Shinobi

I hope that was a reaction test from Jackel.

[Anatole Kuragin]

For everyone out there interested in reading the game and not going along with whatever hair-trigger lynch comes up - I only put the third vote on Who and that was only because Oka didn't use vote tags so I missed it looking for votes.

I'm not sure what the excuse is for seeing an extra vote though, since I only put him at L-2. Nice try though.

[Anatole Kuragin]

I'll believe that Jackel is incapable of counting - but Shinobi has no excuse.

[Shinobi]

My excuse is that I'm not actually reading the thread, apparently. Strike 2 against myself.

Though I checked and you didn't actually put him at L-2, so that makes two of us derpin'.

UNVOTE: Anatole
VOTE: Siveure

[Shinobi]

Ugh, edit again, yes you did.

I'm just gonna step away from the computer for a while.

[Siveure DtTrikyp]

Eurgh idk whats going on.

Wait, why shinobi vote me?

[Shinobi]

Why the fuck are people only concerned with getting voted?

Everyone seems totally happy to let the thread stagnate and nobody wants to do more in terms of RVS or promote conversation. Siveure, why don't you care about anything other than being voted?

[Lucky2u]

Vote Count 1.1

All is Who (2)

- Bert, OkaPoka
Kabooooom (0) -
Jackel98 (0) -
OkaPoka (0) -
Shinobi (1) - Anatole Kuragin
Guyett (0) -

Siveure DtTrikyp (2)

- kabooooom, Shinobi
Bert (1) - Siveure DtTrikyp
Anatole Kuragin (1) - Jackel98

Not Voting: Guyett, All is Who

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch!

Deadline is in (expired on 2014-09-06 12:00:00)

[Anatole Kuragin]

Eurgh idk whats going on.

Wait, why shinobi vote me?

Because he'll vote whoever looks promising at the time.

[Anatole Kuragin]

Promising for a lynch, not promising for a scum flip.

[Bert]

Prod dooooooooooooooodge

I read something in Lucky's advertisement about there being a 3:1 or 4:1 scum:town ratio or something? I'll double check that later.

So this can't be 4 scum vs. 5 town like his past games I was in, right? More balanced if so.

[Shinobi]

Eurgh idk whats going on.

Wait, why shinobi vote me?

Because he'll vote whoever looks promising at the time.

What makes you think this?

[Anatole Kuragin]

UNVOTE: Bert
VOTE: Jackel98

I'm okay with this new wagon. I can also point out that Anatole doesn't even believe that Who is scum, but still thinks it's okay to do all the things Jackel listed.

UNVOTE: Jackel98
VOTE: Anatole Kuragin

My excuse is that I'm not actually reading the thread, apparently. Strike 2 against myself.

Though I checked and you didn't actually put him at L-2, so that makes two of us derpin'.

UNVOTE: Anatole
VOTE: Siveure

[Shinobi]

So voting people during RVS to gauge reactions and promote discussion = looking for easy lynches?

I'm pretty sure I was the only one trying to move the thread forward, so I don't really see how that's an honest conclusion you could jump to.

[OkaPoka]

Can I claim already?

[Shinobi]

Can I claim already?

It's page 3. What possible claim would you have that could benefit us at this point?

[Anatole Kuragin]

So voting people during RVS to gauge reactions and promote discussion = looking for easy lynches?

I'm pretty sure I was the only one trying to move the thread forward, so I don't really see how that's an honest conclusion you could jump to.

You said your first vote was RVS - but actually all 4 of the votes you've made were. Including when you attempted to support the vote with clearly fabricated reasoning. Makes sense.

[Shinobi]

I've already admitted that I made a mistake by voting you. I misread the thread and I moved my vote when I saw the mistake I made. I don't know how you can just pin my mistake as "clear scum motivation" when there's another possible explanation. Something else I don't understand is why you voted me specifically over Jackel, where you said:

I'll believe that Jackel is incapable of counting - but Shinobi has no excuse.

Theoretically, Jackel made either the same mistake that I did by misreading the thread, or is actually guilty of the aforementioned fabricated reasoning. Yet, for some reason, you arbitrarily let her go because you think she "can't count." What gives?

And I don't see what the problem is with classifying all of my votes thus far as RVS. If you honestly believe I was pushing for a lynch that early in the game, then you are simply mistaken. I saw what looked like a sensible early wagon, and moved my vote when I realized that it wasn't actually sensible.

[kabooooom]

I am ALSO who. I agree with who that claiming scum submissions is probably a good idea.

I submitted alien psychotrooper. Or psychomagnet... uh, lemme check - okay yeah it was psychomagnet

I didn't get any of my three roles.

Also any innocent childs should probably NOT do their thing.

~Who

so yeah..

this looks fake. it seems to me that you were acting like you forgot which it was, psychotrooper or psychomagnet. i think that was a cheap trick to make it look like you actually submitted that.

and can anyone play update and write everyone's submissions?

mine were- scum- alien mass redirector
town- town tracker
town- town conspiracy theorist

[kabooooom]

everyone, vote SDT (hint: he is scum)

[kabooooom]

Eurgh idk whats going on.

Wait, why shinobi vote me?

why are you tensed about players voting you in rvs?

[Anatole Kuragin]

I've already admitted that I made a mistake by voting you. I misread the thread and I moved my vote when I saw the mistake I made. I don't know how you can just pin my mistake as "clear scum motivation" when there's another possible explanation. Something else I don't understand is why you voted me specifically over Jackel, where you said:

I'll believe that Jackel is incapable of counting - but Shinobi has no excuse.

Theoretically, Jackel made either the same mistake that I did by misreading the thread, or is actually guilty of the aforementioned fabricated reasoning. Yet, for some reason, you arbitrarily let her go because you think she "can't count." What gives?

And I don't see what the problem is with classifying all of my votes thus far as RVS. If you honestly believe I was pushing for a lynch that early in the game, then you are simply mistaken. I saw what looked like a sensible early wagon, and moved my vote when I realized that it wasn't actually sensible.

It's harder to buy "RVS" as an excuse when you're putting a stacked vote out without even reading the case you're supporting. Jackel miscalculated and you just sheeped it without being buggered to look. The latter looks worse.

[Anatole Kuragin]

Why are we still claiming town submissions?

[Shinobi]

I've already admitted that I made a mistake by voting you. I misread the thread and I moved my vote when I saw the mistake I made. I don't know how you can just pin my mistake as "clear scum motivation" when there's another possible explanation. Something else I don't understand is why you voted me specifically over Jackel, where you said:

I'll believe that Jackel is incapable of counting - but Shinobi has no excuse.

Theoretically, Jackel made either the same mistake that I did by misreading the thread, or is actually guilty of the aforementioned fabricated reasoning. Yet, for some reason, you arbitrarily let her go because you think she "can't count." What gives?

And I don't see what the problem is with classifying all of my votes thus far as RVS. If you honestly believe I was pushing for a lynch that early in the game, then you are simply mistaken. I saw what looked like a sensible early wagon, and moved my vote when I realized that it wasn't actually sensible.

It's harder to buy "RVS" as an excuse when you're putting a stacked vote out without even reading the case you're supporting. Jackel miscalculated and you just sheeped it without being buggered to look. The latter looks worse.

What makes you so sure that Jackel can be the only one who miscalculated? You're assuming I didn't look, and I went and got it wrong twice.

You don't think any of my responses to anything were reasonable?

[Anatole Kuragin]

I've already admitted that I made a mistake by voting you. I misread the thread and I moved my vote when I saw the mistake I made. I don't know how you can just pin my mistake as "clear scum motivation" when there's another possible explanation. Something else I don't understand is why you voted me specifically over Jackel, where you said:

I'll believe that Jackel is incapable of counting - but Shinobi has no excuse.

Theoretically, Jackel made either the same mistake that I did by misreading the thread, or is actually guilty of the aforementioned fabricated reasoning. Yet, for some reason, you arbitrarily let her go because you think she "can't count." What gives?

And I don't see what the problem is with classifying all of my votes thus far as RVS. If you honestly believe I was pushing for a lynch that early in the game, then you are simply mistaken. I saw what looked like a sensible early wagon, and moved my vote when I realized that it wasn't actually sensible.

It's harder to buy "RVS" as an excuse when you're putting a stacked vote out without even reading the case you're supporting. Jackel miscalculated and you just sheeped it without being buggered to look. The latter looks worse.

What makes you so sure that Jackel can be the only one who miscalculated? You're assuming I didn't look, and I went and got it wrong twice.

You don't think any of my responses to anything were reasonable?

As reasonable as a defense of the position of anti-town votes being forgivable can be, sure. I think you didn't look at all.