NY 177: Simple Complexity (GAME OVER: Scum Wins!)

Mirhawk · Post Post #3550 (ISO) » Sun Sep 14, 2014 6:50 pm

Actually now that I think about it, I dislike his other posts for different reasons. These ones are a bit of a rough fit for his regular behavior.

Titus · Post Post #3551 (ISO) » Sun Sep 14, 2014 7:45 pm

In post 3544, reinoe wrote:
In post 3540, Titus wrote:
In post 3537, reinoe wrote:
In post 3536, shaddowez wrote:I'm actually not comfortable with the Pere wagon right now. Assuming for the moment that all claims are legit, based on those and flips his reads early game were very off - Tree as scum (assumed mason), Aero as town (conf scum), Titus as scum (assumed cop). That and lack of activity are making it hard for me to read him, but there does seem to be some scumhunting going on. The biggest thing making me think he's scum is actually not anything in his ISO, but this post from tn. Still getting a slight scum vibe from tn, and the add-on of Pere at the end there feels like a push. I'm going to wait to hear from Pere before moving my vote.

Shaddowez no...Pere is scum. He's been pushing my lynch as well. And that scumhunting was just him targeting town.

Yeah and your reads have been shit... all damn day. Not surprised Pere is pushing your lynch here. You are town but DAMN get it together.

Your acts make ZERO sense. You know I am town and I know you are town. Yet we cannot agree on a single fucking scumread. You are being immensely frustrating. Can we wagon Mirhawk?

Pere is scum for having a hard-on for calling Aeronaut town. Nobody had any reason to call Aero town.

Then why wouldn't scum bus when Aero was going down? If PV was scum why not shoot me for getting along with Marquis?

Titus · Post Post #3552 (ISO) » Sun Sep 14, 2014 7:47 pm

In post 3550, Mirhawk wrote:Actually now that I think about it, I dislike his other posts for different reasons. These ones are a bit of a rough fit for his regular behavior.

Now that Mirhawk thinks about it (cough coincidence with PV being large wagon) Mirhawk needs an excuse to move.

VOTE: Mirhawk

Mirhawk · Post Post #3553 (ISO) » Sun Sep 14, 2014 8:03 pm

Why would scum shoot you, you claimed to be bulletproof. That's a terrible argument.

Also that post has nothing to do with the context you're using it in. Thanks for that.

Mirhawk · Post Post #3554 (ISO) » Sun Sep 14, 2014 8:06 pm

Actually I don't understand that argument in general. What do you and Marquis have to do with whether PV was bussing Aero?

tn5421 · Post Post #3555 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 3:35 am

I don't have any strong feelings on the Peregrine wagon one way or another. I'd hammer it only if doing so would prevent a no-lynch.

In post 3538, Marquis wrote:no, i agree with part of that

tn is one of those scumreads that's sitting there but i'm not touching because there are shinier things to look at

maybe tomorrow or the day after, but it's not a priority

If you're scumreading me put your vote where your posts are, otherwise direct questions or shut up.

Alina · Post Post #3556 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:59 am

I'll catch up later tonight

sorry guys, been busy

Marquis · Post Post #3557 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 5:42 am

In post 3555, tn5421 wrote:
In post 3538, Marquis wrote:no, i agree with part of that

tn is one of those scumreads that's sitting there but i'm not touching because there are shinier things to look at

maybe tomorrow or the day after, but it's not a priority

If you're scumreading me put your vote where your posts are, otherwise direct questions or shut up.

lol i just addressed why i'm not voting you. i mean, you it was literally in your own post right there

it's ok man u don't have to act strong for me. we will get there when we get there : )

Majiffy · Post Post #3558 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 5:46 am

In post 3540, Titus wrote:Can we wagon Mirhawk?

Very much, yes.

VOTE: Mirhawk

notscience · Post Post #3559 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 5:48 am

can we wagon psyche

Marquis · Post Post #3560 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:04 am

In post 3554, Mirhawk wrote:Actually I don't understand that argument in general. What do you and Marquis have to do with whether PV was bussing Aero?

titus is trying to argue that she and i are townreading each other and scumreading pv in our pt, so if pv is scum why aren't either of us dead

there's a counterargument however in how if pv is scum, he doesn't want to reduce the # of ppl in the hood, making the likelihood of him being scum appear to be higher. it's a long-term survival plan that works better than just killing one of us

and ns, no. go away.

Majiffy · Post Post #3561 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:07 am

In post 3559, notscience wrote:can we wagon psyche

I would love to, but "wah mason claims!"

We'll just let all the scum fake-claim their way out of lynches all game.

Psyche · Post Post #3562 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:22 am

oh, majiffy is still alive
why?

reinoe · Post Post #3563 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:36 am

In post 3561, Majiffy wrote:
In post 3559, notscience wrote:can we wagon psyche

I would love to, but "wah mason claims!"

We'll just let all the scum fake-claim their way out of lynches all game.

What's wrong with scum fake-claims when there's a serial killer out there? If scum is fake-claiming then the SK has plenty targets.

Why don't you want to wagon Pere? Is it because he's your scumbuddy?

Majiffy · Post Post #3564 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:42 am

Wagon reeks and also is full of scumreads like Marquis and Psyche.

zMuffinMan · Post Post #3565 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:45 am

not caught up til prob tomorrow

mirhawk is probably town, though, so whatevs

Psyche · Post Post #3566 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:03 am

i havent even joined a wagon

Marquis · Post Post #3567 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:08 am

loljiffu

Mirhawk · Post Post #3568 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:49 am

In post 3562, Psyche wrote:oh, majiffy is still alive
why?

Apparently playing like scum is just how Jiffy plays.

Or at least that's the explanation that was used to handwave all of Jiffys scummy posts away.

PeregrineV · Post Post #3569 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:11 am

In post 3350, OkaPoka wrote:Marquis is not scum majiffy.

What is this based on?

PeregrineV · Post Post #3570 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:12 am

In post 3355, reinoe wrote:What's your opinion of PV?

He's Fucking Awesome.

PeregrineV · Post Post #3571 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:17 am

In post 3375, OkaPoka wrote:Also you dumb pushers are going to screw town over. Scum can hide. Scum can whiteknight. Scum can wagon. Scum can sheep.

Oh wait lynching me gives scum an advantage.

And then tomorrow scum will push on reasoning called "whiteknighting"

And then we lose. :/

So we kill scum now and clean this mess up.

Pedit: ^^^^^^^
So I suggest we get on the move and start scumhunting for real scum. Instead of sheeping scum.

Not to poop in your horn you are trying to toot, but you let the claimed PR you "protected" night1 die night2. If you've fully explained the "why" behind that, then link please. Otherwise, your play is strongly reminiscent of scum.

PeregrineV · Post Post #3572 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:31 am

In post 3451, Alina wrote:What exactly is the point of posting stuff like this? Like really. If you don't have anything remotely useful to say please stop posting. It makes catching up incredibly irritating, and the fact that you attack people for "lurking" just for having less posts than you because they don't post useless crap like this is irritating as heckie.

Not to nitpick, but you called his posts useless crap (a lot of them are) and then proceed to make 55% of your post responses to Oka's crap posts?

PeregrineV · Post Post #3573 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:37 am

In post 3517, Marquis wrote:
In post 3516, Marquis wrote:The game's 15:3:3 Fifteen Townies, three Red Scum, three Blue Scum.

Amazingly, the mod has informed us in the neighborhood that this is

NOT

the game setup, and that all given set-up information is in the OP, and yet you have continued to push this.

Any particular reason why?

Marquis · Post Post #3574 (ISO) » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:52 am

so first i thought you were attacking me for bringing that up and i was going to say, "fuck you, YOU were the one who brought that up in the hood and the only reason i noticed it in the first place"

because i don't understand why else wake would say that in the queue, when both the setup AND first post were supposed to be reviewed for consistency and completeness at that time

all i could think of was "wake changed his mind about making that info public" but with the kill flavor (which isn't normal i don't think but that's another matter) indicating mafia + sk i'm just confused now