In post 899, farside22 wrote:I still think scum bel would vote his scum buddy for town credit.
What did you think of bird's case?
But I don't think Beli's overall play this game wouldn't follow that.
Bird's case on who, specifically?
In post 899, farside22 wrote:I still think scum bel would vote his scum buddy for town credit.
What did you think of bird's case?
In post 900, acryon wrote:In post 899, farside22 wrote:I still think scum bel would vote his scum buddy for town credit.
What did you think of bird's case?
But I don't think Beli's overall play this game wouldn't follow that.
Bird's case on who, specifically?
In post 901, farside22 wrote:In post 900, acryon wrote:In post 899, farside22 wrote:I still think scum bel would vote his scum buddy for town credit.
What did you think of bird's case?
But I don't think Beli's overall play this game wouldn't follow that.
Bird's case on who, specifically?
Amy.
In post 903, ChannelDelibird wrote:acryon - how do you reconcile suddenly deciding that my predecessor was a 'likely buddy' for Belisarius with your remarkthat my entry to the game (including huge case on Belisarius) was "super town"?
In post 906, TobyLoby wrote:I don't know how much to take from Beli's play yesterday. There was a distinct point where he seemed to give up when he called Amy scum and voted for CKD and the rest was probably wifom.
I looked up Beli's meta and he's okay with busing. He doesn't seem to bus outright early though, and not without there being reason to do so. This kinda makes me want to eliminate farside.
Beli mainly communicated and responded to me yesterday. This makes me think he may have actively engaged more so with townies. But for d1 play, this kinda makes me want to eliminate Amy. Amy and farside were his main engagements and communications the first day.
In post 903, ChannelDelibird wrote:I also think that CKD is a reasonably unlikely Belibuddy and is not a good vote Today.
In post 911, TobyLoby wrote:Acyron, you are free to provide me evidence, which would have to be meta evidence, that Beli is capable of actively avoiding adhering to a specific play.
The only one I meta read out of that was farside too. Do you believe farside deserves more looking into?
In post 912, acryon wrote:I just strongly dislike meta-reading, as in my experience, it does more to misdirect than anything else. This applies doubly for Beli IMO, because at the very least his slot in this game was a bit of a wild-card page-to-page. He just seems to me like someone who, as a target of it, would make meta-analysis even worse.
In post 902, acryon wrote:In post 901, farside22 wrote:In post 900, acryon wrote:In post 899, farside22 wrote:I still think scum bel would vote his scum buddy for town credit.
What did you think of bird's case?
But I don't think Beli's overall play this game wouldn't follow that.
Bird's case on who, specifically?
Amy.
It's pretty good. Specifically, I really don't like Amy's complete disappearance at the end of D1. She seemed to get in at the beginning, rack up some town-cred, and back out. The fact that Beli mentioned the rule of 3 on Amy's 543 is very interesting, especially reading back over it now. It's also interesting that he mentioned the rule of three, and then rather than voting the one person who is definitely scum in his scenario (Amy), he went for the 50/50 (in his spot) of CKD/Chaos. The fact that he didn't push for Amy in that situation is certainly suspicious.
I'd be interested in hearing her thoughts today.
In post 916, scrambles wrote:In post 902, acryon wrote:In post 901, farside22 wrote:In post 900, acryon wrote:In post 899, farside22 wrote:I still think scum bel would vote his scum buddy for town credit.
What did you think of bird's case?
But I don't think Beli's overall play this game wouldn't follow that.
Bird's case on who, specifically?
Amy.
It's pretty good. Specifically, I really don't like Amy's complete disappearance at the end of D1. She seemed to get in at the beginning, rack up some town-cred, and back out. The fact that Beli mentioned the rule of 3 on Amy's 543 is very interesting, especially reading back over it now. It's also interesting that he mentioned the rule of three, and then rather than voting the one person who is definitely scum in his scenario (Amy), he went for the 50/50 (in his spot) of CKD/Chaos. The fact that he didn't push for Amy in that situation is certainly suspicious.
I'd be interested in hearing her thoughts today.
I'm not sure taking anything beli did as indicative of alignment is a smart move. He was very slippery from the start. (plus I have kind of a pr read on amy, so)
In post 915, TobyLoby wrote:In post 912, acryon wrote:I just strongly dislike meta-reading, as in my experience, it does more to misdirect than anything else. This applies doubly for Beli IMO, because at the very least his slot in this game was a bit of a wild-card page-to-page. He just seems to me like someone who, as a target of it, would make meta-analysis even worse.
People were discussing his meta yesterday.
Titus is trying to wade through what the wifom means today
But my metaing on what sort of busing Beli does is that gets your goat?
In post 917, farside22 wrote:I'm going to put my own case today on Amy some of it is part impression and some is interaction.
I also think looking at those that beli didn't interact with would be good. I notice if not bussing, scum typically avoid interaction with scum buddy.
Toby: did you notice if beli interacted with his scum buddy?
In post 916, scrambles wrote:I'm not sure taking anything beli did as indicative of alignment is a smart move. He was very slippery from the start. (plus I have kind of a pr read on amy, so)
In post 918, farside22 wrote:In post 916, scrambles wrote:In post 902, acryon wrote:In post 901, farside22 wrote:In post 900, acryon wrote:In post 899, farside22 wrote:I still think scum bel would vote his scum buddy for town credit.
What did you think of bird's case?
But I don't think Beli's overall play this game wouldn't follow that.
Bird's case on who, specifically?
Amy.
It's pretty good. Specifically, I really don't like Amy's complete disappearance at the end of D1. She seemed to get in at the beginning, rack up some town-cred, and back out. The fact that Beli mentioned the rule of 3 on Amy's 543 is very interesting, especially reading back over it now. It's also interesting that he mentioned the rule of three, and then rather than voting the one person who is definitely scum in his scenario (Amy), he went for the 50/50 (in his spot) of CKD/Chaos. The fact that he didn't push for Amy in that situation is certainly suspicious.
I'd be interested in hearing her thoughts today.
I'm not sure taking anything beli did as indicative of alignment is a smart move. He was very slippery from the start. (plus I have kind of a pr read on amy, so)
So who is your current scum read and why?
In post 921, acryon wrote:In post 916, scrambles wrote:I'm not sure taking anything beli did as indicative of alignment is a smart move. He was very slippery from the start. (plus I have kind of a pr read on amy, so)
I completely agree with being very cautious when dealing with the actions of a player that was such a wild-card. I just thought it was interesting, and possibly worth taking into consideration.