In post 499, ZZZX wrote:I must ask ut one thing.
How does an action you did make me scum?
Also I'll do my first serious post this Thursday
...are you taking the piss?
In post 499, ZZZX wrote:I must ask ut one thing.
How does an action you did make me scum?
Also I'll do my first serious post this Thursday
In post 500, Nexus wrote:In post 499, ZZZX wrote:I must ask ut one thing.
How does an action you did make me scum?
Also I'll do my first serious post this Thursday
...are you taking the piss?
unvote
Vote: ZZZX
In post 483, vezokpiraka wrote:In post 474, Bella wrote:In post 424, ooba wrote:In post 423, Bella wrote:THIS WAS LOW EVEN FOR YOU, RECK.
When I was compiling scum roles, Desp's insistence on a game claim made me think "What if he rolled a Lyncher role" - but then dropped the idea because Frat Party Mafia (game he claimed) doesnt have a lyncher role.
This post made me think of that again. (as in it gave me vibes of Bella complaining about the role she replaced into)
Gonna take up Triforce's advice to go through wgeurts earlier posts on site.
Read Lost: Season Three, realize that there are very few possible roles he can give me worse than the one I got in that clusterfuck of a game, then conclude (accurately) that I'm bitching about who he conned me into replacing rather than my role.
Just reread the posts of that game.
Unless you are one of the lovers then all the roles you could be are useful or at the very least not VT.
I don't really understand what you are trying to say here.
Also season 2 had the lyncher.
In post 496, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 494, Chevre wrote:This not knowing the lynch threshold = scummy is so dumb. Yeah, maybe if he had quickhammered and then used this excuse, definitely. But he did it right after seeing a votecount. Like, how does that make any sense for scum to do? What do they gain from faking that they don't know how many it takes to lynch?
Triforce told him to post
He responded by posting that instead of content
I also don't see why people aren't listening to Tri's "just read his posts on site" instructions.
In post 496, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 494, Chevre wrote:This not knowing the lynch threshold = scummy is so dumb. Yeah, maybe if he had quickhammered and then used this excuse, definitely. But he did it right after seeing a votecount. Like, how does that make any sense for scum to do? What do they gain from faking that they don't know how many it takes to lynch?
Triforce told him to post
He responded by posting that instead of content
I also don't see why people aren't listening to Tri's "just read his posts on site" instructions.
In post 506, ooba wrote:a) He definitely knows about the 1/2 lynch rule
b) Let me just say that I can see a scenario where a scum buddy might have asked/advised wgeurts to play up the newbie card this game - I can't talk more about this
In post 504, Bella wrote:Occam's razor, bro.
what the fuck are you talking about?In post 499, ZZZX wrote:I must ask ut one thing.
How does an action you did make me scum?
Also I'll do my first serious post this Thursday
In post 494, Chevre wrote:This not knowing the lynch threshold = scummy is so dumb. Yeah, maybe if he had quickhammered and then used this excuse, definitely. But he did it right after seeing a votecount. Like, how does that make any sense for scum to do? What do they gain from faking that they don't know how many it takes to lynch?
In post 457, Iecerint wrote:In post 399, Untrod Tripod wrote:oh iec please don't think I'm being salty because I don't like you, I'm just feeling ~sassy~ right now
Huh? What gave you that impression?
In post 517, SleepyKrew wrote:To end his wagon!
I don't think it'll work
You still seem to be voting ZZZX though