In post 297, Flames of Disaster wrote:Let me try an OkaPoka special:
'One of the two Flames must be scum. It is certainly not Flames of Disaster.'
Let's try my special. Flames101 is town so fod is scum!
In post 297, Flames of Disaster wrote:Let me try an OkaPoka special:
'One of the two Flames must be scum. It is certainly not Flames of Disaster.'
In post 1468, Slandaar wrote:
You will need to show this.
---
And this.
I mean everyone knows it is just made up nonsense.
In post 1472, Slandaar wrote:Oh and don't be intimidated just provide the quotes requested. They exist, right?
In post 1484, Slandaar wrote:Why are you writing a wall saying nothing instead of producing what is requested?
In post 1486, Slandaar wrote:Actually I want 4 quotes.
But you seem to be trying your hardest to avoid producing.
In post 1488, Slandaar wrote:You have said numerous things which are blatantly untrue.
This is an issue.
Produce the quotes.
In post 1490, Slandaar wrote:No-one is going to fall for this I mean the longer you delay the worse it looks for you but then... you can't produce the required quotes.
What a bad position you find yourself in.
In post 1711, Varsoon wrote:Also, Slandaar, I only skimmed the thread.
My points on you were pretty much all misinformed, as I clumped up a lot of the ideas I had about multiple players onto ones about you.
I probably lied a bunch in there.
But it was really funny, and you took it really seriously, which made it funnier.
In post 1738, Slandaar wrote:You have trashed this thread lying and misrepping me knowing full well you are doing it.
Why would town do this again Varsoon?
Why would town try to mislynch someone with lies and misreps?
Do explain.
In post 2043, OkaPoka wrote:Link it to me
In post 450, Flames of Disaster wrote:In post 442, Slandaar wrote:In post 430, Flames of Disaster wrote:Sigh. Okay, look. It doesn't matter what he did or did not mention, or what he missed. It matters that he did make it up. I do not like your line of inquiry.
You need a reason to disbelieve them. Your reason is he didn't play with you before but I say well he found the games so it is not unreasonable to assume he did in fact look at them. Take for example SDR1 he only needed look at page 1 to see the difference and he DID look at page one to find out your alignment in the game, did he scroll down a little? yes I am going to believe he did.
In post 430, Flames of Disaster wrote:
I'm not going to make a full-on long explanation just because a newbie scum "troll" egosearched me and linked some of my past games and said, "Oh, you aren't following your town meta, you are scummy".
He obviously made that read up, and it's basic commonsense. Anyone can see that.
Here are the facts: If you truly are convinced of his guilt for this then providing said long explanation is beneficial for you in multiple ways. Otherwise do not expect someone you are convinced is scum to be lynched on 'basic common sense' it is your choice.
Firstly, he only mentioned that "you are not following your town meta". So, in what way am I "not following my town meta"? Any details? Any specific thing that he wants to point out? "You are less active". Even a three year old kid can come up with that. If he did look through my past games legitimately, he would have more substantive things to say about my "meta", rather than "oh, you look scummy".
Secondly, isn't it convenient that
In post 249, Bookitty wrote:During the first Dangan Ronpa game, Flames of Disaster and I went at each other tooth and nail and fought it out throughout the initial stages of the game. To be fair, it was just as much my fault as his, but we were both town.
That's my only experience in playing with him, so I'm not sure how helpful it is. I do think he was a lot more active and aggressive in that game, though.
In post 246, Team 9 wrote:oh also
I've played with town FoD before (I was scum) and he definitely wasn't lurkfucking like he is here. in that game he had a shitton of activity right out the gate and you could tell he was trying to make things happen in the game.
-Rumia
Two other more legitimate-looking townie-looking players gave the same read and reason "Flames is not playing to <past versions on how I remember him like>." Isn't it a coincidence that Flames123 came up with the same idea long afterwards? I'm sure he would have went to link my past games and say that "I wasn't following town meta" if Team 9 and Bookitty didn't say it first, wouldn't he?
Thirdly, if he did look at my past games legitimately, there are very striking things that he would have exclaimed. Firstly, I amalways rightalways on the right wagon. In my past games, 100% of the time, I was on a scum lynch, and never mislynched a townie before. Secondly, I am an alt. Nope, Flames999 wouldn't have noticed that while he read my past games, not at all. Even though I mentioned it like maybe 5 billion and one times, I have to check.
Last but not least, his past games and even his current play in this game reveal that he is terrible and probably lacks the intelligence to metadive in a competent fashion; maybe he will even fail to read so many meta games at once. Do you seriously think someone like that can have the mojo to read /anyone/'s past games? I know many stronger players that can't.
So, are you going to help me lynch this scumbutt right now, or are you going to continue to be a thorn in the side?
In post 820, Flames of Disaster wrote:Why Flames122 is scum.
1) He has contributed very little in the game, poor reads, poor contributions, poor quality of posts.
Here are examples of the kid being a little shit.
In post 341, Flames682 wrote:In post 338, Flames of Disaster wrote:In post 331, Flames682 wrote:In post 325, Flames of Disaster wrote:In post 323, Flames682 wrote:I am a Mafia Serial Cult Leader Killer Goon
No wonder you are so bad. According to your wiki, you have never played mafia before.
Unfortunately for you, I am specialized in eliminating scum. This is your first time. You are caught scum. Die in a fire.
Wow your specialty must not be in reading. Your wiki reading skills are amazing!
My speciality is in making scums like you look like stupid idiots. Then lynch them. I have succeeded in the first part.
dOES U KNO WAT A TROLL ES?
In post 299, Flames682 wrote:In post 295, Flames of Disaster wrote:VOTE: flames682
I know I am already voting him but just to make this clear.
Wow I'm so threatened. I'm voting you because of your town meta and how the fuck you didn't see that is beyond me.
Also
VOTE: fLAMES OF dISASTER
In post 771, Flames682 wrote:If someone provides me with more examples of Saki town doing this I'll vote NF
2) Naturally, coincidentally, unsurprisingly, expectedly, Flames222 was very happy to hop onto the Saki wagon despite "Flames of Disaster is sooo super scum! 100%! @!$!@$"
(9) Saki: notscience, Bookitty, Team 9, Flames682, Slandaar, Min, OkaPoka, vezokpiraka, Not_Mafia (LYNCH)
Obviously, Flamescum was very excited to the town wagon. He was happy to vote town, voting me or voting Saki is okay, as long as it is on town.
Such a scummy behaviour can only come for scum.
AND I can still continue to re quote my old case.
Which was in hindsight, a waste of my time,
so I see no reason to prolong this further.
Hang Flames268.
In post 2050, OkaPoka wrote:In post 297, Flames of Disaster wrote:Let me try an OkaPoka special:
'One of the two Flames must be scum. It is certainly not Flames of Disaster.'
Let's try my special. Flames101 is town so fod is scum!
In post 2000, Varsoon wrote:It doesn't matter if you're 'purposefully doing it'.
You PURPOSEFULLY posted that you NEVER have the highest post-count as Scum.
If it's just a point in your meta, then let it just be a point in your meta.
We discussed this.
In post 2038, OkaPoka wrote:In post 1654, OkaPoka wrote:This is some silly shit.
Anyways either FoD or Flames69 had to be scum, they tunneled each other there was no way they could both be town at that point. FoD didn't ever explain his reasons, and he just went with the flow. He lurked until Flames wagon got speed so he could push it more.
In post 2060, Slandaar wrote:It's also worth saying when TSQ and Varsoon offer 1v1's they forget to add the clause 'if one flips town the other goes the next day' this is because they are scum and if I go first they don't wish to be lynched obviously and if they go first they know the clause doesn't benefit them. This is the key point though, they forget the clause because it doesn't benefit them when they are lynched first.
In post 2039, OkaPoka wrote:Varsoon give me a tldr case on slandaar. You have 25 words.
Slandaar you too.