In post 2548, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Whoops the last quote is from a scumgame.
Clearly this means that I'm innocent because I follow up on questions when I'm scum! Checkmate.
In post 2548, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Whoops the last quote is from a scumgame.
In post 2547, Cheetory6 wrote:I didn't call your selfmeta scummy here, I was more just expressing that selfmeta isn't really a valid defense. I'm an idiot for using it too, but I fail to see how me being stupid makes me scum.
In post 2547, Cheetory6 wrote:I didn't call your selfmeta scummy here, I was more just expressing that selfmeta isn't really a valid defense. I'm an idiot for using it too, but I fail to see how me being stupid makes me scum.
In post 2547, Cheetory6 wrote:It's fucking different though. You were asking someone who you thought was suspicious of you if they were scumreading you. I was trying to start conversation in both of those instances. This is fucking hard misrep dude.
In post 2547, Cheetory6 wrote:Explained reasoning behind not pushing a single line of questioning here. Said player I questioned in that game was someone who had no potential explanation for completely ignoring reading someone when I'd asked them to and they'd entirely ignored me. If you can't see the difference there then I don't even know what the fuck to tell you at this point.
What reads would a lynx flip solidify, pray tell? I think this is bullshit.In post 2547, Cheetory6 wrote:This is a big game in which the deadline is winding down and I want flips to solidify reads.
In post 2547, Cheetory6 wrote:This is why applying meta too hard is bullshit because you're wrong. Lol. I honestly just want to get to L-2, claim, and if you don't believe me by then just be free from this game.
In post 2549, Cheetory6 wrote:STD is the scummiest person to bandwagon this atm.
No engagement with me. He's just talking with orci about it and pushing forward his own terrible reasoning in a way that feels like he's trying to seem like he's contributing.
If I get lynched please give him shit D3.
In post 2521, SMP wrote:Sorry lunchtime.
Anyway, VOTE: Flubber
My main problem with him is that in the neighborhood his reasoning for calling people scum is bad and he only posts in the neighborhood when he's being called out. Towards the beginning of D2 he accused another member of being scum based on POE. My problem with that was that he did the whole "I know I'm obviously town" thing which tends to make me lean scum on someone. On top of that he accused someone who really had no reason to be accused. Literally, his only reasoning was POE in a neighborhood that might not have any scum members in it.
The other thing is that he hasn't posted in the neighborhood since calling out his POE target unless I specifically say that I think he's scum. He posted once after I said I would probably have a vote on Flubber but don't want to out the neighborhood, and another time about 30 min ago saying that he wants to out certain members of the neighborhood without really giving a reason. In between these times there's been conversation that everyone else in the neighborhood has participated in, including people's thoughts on certain posts and abilities that have been claimed throughout the day.
On top of that we get things like 105,106 where he blind votes Varsoon while saying he gets town points. 141 where he's just following along with the Varsoon wagon even though he gave him town points. The rest of the game day he didn't really do much except blind vote Mara then switch back to Varsoon and park there. He even admits to giving up on reading the rest of D1 in 967, and just leaves his vote on Varsoon.
He's also been useless today. We have everything between 1315 and 1392 which do nothing but derail any intelligent conversation that was occurring at that time. Because Orci asked him to talk about Saki and ABR and place a vote, he goes from calling Saki's post terrible in 1315, to blind voting for STD in 1316 to asking about ABR's Ceph read in 1317. Then he follows with a bunch of posts that end up cluttering the thread, don't explain anything, and end up moving the direction of the conversation towards what shitposting means.
1607 he townreads wegurts and tells everyone to just leave that alone for now. 2021 and 2120 he takes a question from ABR about Honeybee, saying that he disagreed with some of the points in one of the posts, yet he doesn't explain what he disagreed with, townreads Honeybee, and then immediately changes gears to question Orci's defending of Mara. The only other posts are asking people rhetorical questions in 2173 and 2502.
Truthfully, it's not one glaring things that points me towards Flubber, it's a lot of little things that just aren't helpful for town.
In post 2550, Cheetory6 wrote:In post 2548, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Whoops the last quote is from a scumgame.
Clearly this means that I'm innocent because I follow up on questions when I'm scum! Checkmate.
In post 2549, Cheetory6 wrote:STD is the scummiest person to bandwagon this atm.
No engagement with me. He's just talking with orci about it and pushing forward his own terrible reasoning in a way that feels like he's trying to seem like he's contributing.
If I get lynched please give him shit D3.
In post 2207, Cheetory6 wrote:SMP wrote:Also, in a large game, the players who post a ton without actually saying anything or clog up the thread do more damage than in a 13 player game.
Why is Flubber the best example of this?
In post 2551, Cheetory6 wrote:orcinus wrote:Cheet is also a very reaction-heavy player in the game I’ve seen.
I haven't used reaction tests in a while because they're gimmicky and I only like using them early on D1s.
because std is being lynched today over my literal dead bodyFlubbernugget wrote:In post 2549, Cheetory6 wrote:STD is the scummiest person to bandwagon this atm.
No engagement with me. He's just talking with orci about it and pushing forward his own terrible reasoning in a way that feels like he's trying to seem like he's contributing.
If I get lynched please give him shit D3.
Which you can't do now because??
In post 2561, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:because std is being lynched today over my literal dead body
In post 2564, Bookitty wrote:Cheetory pushed me for answers to his questions and I think he was scumreading me at the time. I don't understand the different treatment of other people in that regard, though. I think he asked Cabd questions that weren't answered either.
@Orci: I wasn't questioning you, in case it wasn't clear. I was correcting a typo in my post where I said WHY instead of WHAT.
In post 2565, notscience wrote:Did someone claim the neotank yet?
orcinus wrote:Why the defeatist attitude already?
orcinus wrote:What reads would a lynx flip solidify, pray tell? I think this is bullshit.
orcinus wrote:There are a lot more quotes you’d need to explain then if you want to go down that path. You follow up on questions pretty hard in your towngames and you haven’t been doing that here.
orcinus wrote:I mean sure but meanwhile players have bandwagoned on before I even posted anything so why aren't you going after them?
orcinus wrote:I didn’t know whether or not STD was scumreading me, which is why I asked for clarification
orcinus wrote:This is false because if you read the quote I wasn’t actually defending myself from anything, so that first sentence is a lie.
orcinus wrote:i mean sure but why do we do things as scum? because we try to look town to people.
when playing on your homesite others are familiar to you so they know what to expect from a towngame. they expect aggression (ie the quote i gave of some dude)
but here, with nobody to supposedly know your meta, you can let your guard down if you're scum. if you were town you'd continue to bite lines of questioning hard because that's how you scumhunt, but you'd have no reason to do it if you were scum
In post 2568, Cheetory6 wrote:Because I hate being in this game. This is easily the least fun game of mafia I've played in a really long time.
SMP wrote:Isn't it curious the parallels between his treatment of fuzzylogic in death note and his treatment of flubber here, even though I would argue they are the same amount of village idiot.
SMP wrote:Also, in a large game, the players who post a ton without actually saying anything or clog up the thread do more damage than in a 13 player game. It's a lot harder to keep up and make reads when post after post is just filled with useless info.
orcinus wrote:tell me more. it seemed like you were doing fine before we dropped scumreads on you?
In post 2568, Cheetory6 wrote:Why do I need specific answers to this? The wagon on him could be informative, if he flips scum it could lead to associative tells and I don't know what else. I just feel like I'll be able to make more sense of things with a flip that I've been involved with at this point.
So you’re telling me you haven’t seen any angles to pursue this game?In post 2568, Cheetory6 wrote:I follow up on specific questions pretty hard when I see an angle I want to pursue. If I like answers to things or don't see it going anywhere then I move on to something else. You telling me that I don't do that in my towngames?
I don’t followIn post 2568, Cheetory6 wrote:I'm self-centered.
What about the second quote where you say “ppl should give opinions on me cos I’ve posted a lot”? How can that not be construed as trying to see what people are thinking of you?In post 2568, Cheetory6 wrote:Do you seriously think "STD r u scumreading me?" is the same as me saying "yoh Alt, you haven't said much yet, read me". One is trying to see what people are thinking of you. The other was me clearly trying to start conversation with someone who hadn't done much in the game.
In post 2568, Cheetory6 wrote:I already told you I skimmed hard on my first readthrough, so I don't know why you're assuming I'm lying about making mistakes. I'm playing clumsy. You've got me there. I really fail to see why that makes me scum.
Admittedly no, and this has been an issue I’ve been bringing up in our neighborhood. I was toying with the idea of waiting until day 3 to observe longer how you act when you are all caught up in the game. Ultimately I disliked that flubber was SMP’s target so I decided to strike this case up to see how you might respond.In post 2568, Cheetory6 wrote:Do you have meta on me replacing into a game? Do you have meta on me replacing into a game where I know almost none of the playerlist? Your example falls apart super fucking hard because you assume that I'm going to play town the exact same way when I'm trying to analyze shit that I wasn't directly a part of.
In post 2554, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 2521, SMP wrote:Sorry lunchtime.
Anyway, VOTE: Flubber
My main problem with him is that in the neighborhood his reasoning for calling people scum is bad and he only posts in the neighborhood when he's being called out. Towards the beginning of D2 he accused another member of being scum based on POE. My problem with that was that he did the whole "I know I'm obviously town" thing which tends to make me lean scum on someone. On top of that he accused someone who really had no reason to be accused. Literally, his only reasoning was POE in a neighborhood that might not have any scum members in it.
Except I'm not scum reading that individual? I already said it was a fucked up attempt to elicit a reaction and is a moot point.
In post 2554, Flubbernugget wrote:
The other thing is that he hasn't posted in the neighborhood since calling out his POE target unless I specifically say that I think he's scum. He posted once after I said I would probably have a vote on Flubber but don't want to out the neighborhood, and another time about 30 min ago saying that he wants to out certain members of the neighborhood without really giving a reason. In between these times there's been conversation that everyone else in the neighborhood has participated in, including people's thoughts on certain posts and abilities that have been claimed throughout the day.
You have self-importance issues.
In post 2554, Flubbernugget wrote:
On top of that we get things like 105,106 where he blind votes Varsoon while saying he gets town points. 141 where he's just following along with the Varsoon wagon even though he gave him town points. The rest of the game day he didn't really do much except blind vote Mara then switch back to Varsoon and park there. He even admits to giving up on reading the rest of D1 in 967, and just leaves his vote on Varsoon.
Varsoon even said my town points comment was an asshole remark to a previous game and that I wasn't actually town reading him for not replacing out. But hey, facts don't matter when you gotta scumpaint someone.
And yeah I had trouble understanding the slip so I waffled. It got clearer in time and my vote went back to where it belonged.
In post 2554, Flubbernugget wrote:
He's also been useless today. We have everything between 1315 and 1392 which do nothing but derail any intelligent conversation that was occurring at that time. Because Orci asked him to talk about Saki and ABR and place a vote, he goes from calling Saki's post terrible in 1315, to blind voting for STD in 1316 to asking about ABR's Ceph read in 1317. Then he follows with a bunch of posts that end up cluttering the thread, don't explain anything, and end up moving the direction of the conversation towards what shitposting means.
So a misunderstanding between me and STD is a thread derail. I could have pushed a lot harder on the issue if I wanted to waste time.
A bad post doesn't make someone scum as far as saki is concerned, and if you didn't see Cephir as obvtown at that point we should have talked about that.
But in other news the strongest points of your argument make this lynch look more policy than scumhunting.
In post 2554, Flubbernugget wrote:
1607 he townreads wegurts and tells everyone to just leave that alone for now. 2021 and 2120 he takes a question from ABR about Honeybee, saying that he disagreed with some of the points in one of the posts, yet he doesn't explain what he disagreed with, townreads Honeybee, and then immediately changes gears to question Orci's defending of Mara. The only other posts are asking people rhetorical questions in 2173 and 2502.
I didn't think speculation on guts was pro-town.
If I only think I stated this I'll state it here. I saw one of Bookitty's posts town reading Honeybee, and glancing over it, I thought several points she made were wrong. But when I looked again there was only one point I could have argued as a null tell over a town tell, and had no refute to her other points. I wish I could have had a discussion about it, but it would have only been a circle-jerk, or more shitposting.
In post 2554, Flubbernugget wrote:
Truthfully, it's not one glaring things that points me towards Flubber, it's a lot of little things that just aren't helpful for town.
It's a couple of points like this that make me think you're trying to push me off as policy.
In post 2555, Flubbernugget wrote:Also I just had to write a wall so fuck you for that too