In post 218, BlueBloodedToffee wrote: In post 177, Whiskers wrote:Yeah, it would have been. Because it would have been a poor, not-very-strong reason. Thats the "etc" part.
OK, so you didn't 'RVS' vote me because you found a better place to put your vote. I'm gonna go ahead and assume that given you had reasoning for this second vote, reasoning that made it your priority vote, that it was a serious vote.
In post 177, Whiskers wrote:
It doesn't matter, as according to you, RVS can be for a "nonsensical reason." Consider this that; I said it was always a scumtell, and that was nonsense.
Or, if you'd prefer, I'll say, no, there's no trend (to my knowledge) of scum doing this more than town. So no, it isn't a scumtell. It still is, though, anti-town. It still is, too, a dickbag move.
But here, you're making it seem like your vote on Guyett(?) was not a serious one either? So you placed your serious vote on Guyett for a scum-tell you thought you had (even though you exaggerated it), you then retracted this scum-tell and said that actually it isn't a scum-tell, and proceeded to follow this with arguing that your vote on Guyett was actually an RVS vote. What a load of %&^$.
I can't rightly say that it truly is a scumtell. So why would I carry on with it? It
still
was my first post in the game. It was
still
a vote for not a very good reason.
I kept my vote there later 'cause I found Guyett scummy, just I voted him, initially, in my
first post
, because he did something that I personally dislike.
In post 224, Red Arrow wrote:yup, Ollie. My thoughts exactly. It seemed like an 'oops did I just hammer' knowing full well he did. The Ahhh ok seemed to make out that he didn't care and accepted he had just hammered without care and the bottom is nothing but trying to justify what he did.
Don't get me wrong. I thought Kaboose was scum with him (Whiskers), I was wrong on that regard and I probably would have voted him if I had been back before lynch. But that whole hammer vote and follow up was pretty off to me.
Kaboose was L-2 when I voted him-- or, as I was reading along, that's where I wrote it in my post. I voted, I posted, then continued reading, and saw someone else vote him... Which meant I had just been the hammer, unless someone had unvoted. They hadn't.
For the record, it always looks scummy when someone quickhammers and follows up. Looks scummy when someone quickhammers and doesn't. Looks scummy when someone quickhammers, regardless.
I likely would have voted him in the end, anyway-- just like you claim you would have done. I didn't mean for it to be a quickhammer. It's too bad about his role, that seems really powerful, and it's too bad he got mislynched-- but that seems to be the way it was going to go.
But look, don't say it's my follow up post. It's important for me to acknowledge that I had fucked up. And after, to try to get Kaboose's final reads, in Twilight of his lynch. You think it's disingenuous? What's a "good" oopslynch post look like, Red Arrow?
