In post 448, BROseidon wrote:Yeah that claim is bullshit.
So you'd be ok being the hammer then right?
In post 448, BROseidon wrote:Yeah that claim is bullshit.
In post 447, 4burner wrote:Annnnnnnnnnd Supersaint Claim.
Interesting. I'm still confident in Ollie being scum, though.
1) Misrepping me twice.
2) Not fighting the case, fighting the player
3) Resigned to his death - If you are town, fight it and make people see why you are town.
4) He said it himself (which I find a little odd) - It's a claim to strike fear into town and one very easy to make as scum.
If people want this lynch, I'll happily hammer because I'm pretty certain I'm not going to die.
Furthermore, if I do die, my role is not at all vital compared to some others that could/might be in this game.
And Ollie, I'm sure you'll get great satisfaction from my death if you happen to be telling the truth.
No, of course not. I'm town, and even if some people think I'm not town, they can make a case and try to lynch me. Elk, on the other hand, has made two posts in the game. There can not possibly be any read on his slot, no case made against him. If a player should be sacrificed, it should be him.In post 453, Ollie wrote:Would you do it Whiskers?
In post 453, Ollie wrote:btw am I going to congratulate people on reading me as scum for reasons I find unfathomable? Should I throw them an amazing player party? I can't work out how people are reaching most of their conclusions & the terrific points I do make get ignored in the midst of this mass confirmation bias gang bang.
An example being 4burner saying I thought you were scum so I should have voted for you as part of the reason he thought I was scum. I argued against it with two actual quotes, then brought it up again, both times it wasn't even responded to. So when that happens I start attacking the credibility of the player as it's useless to defend flat out wrong reads that won't even get responded to.
In post 446, 4burner wrote:I know I'm town. If I see someone who is seeing the game in the same way as I do and acting thusly, it's more than likely they are town. If the logic is self contained and hangs together well, then I'm inclined to see it as town. If however, they were to go along posting as if they saw the game like I do and then acted in a way that I wouldn't expect, then that would send up flags. RA for mine has played in a fashion (at least early on) that correlates in numerous ways with my own, or at least my own train of thought. Combine this with no real pings from the slot and I arrive a townread. Would you disagree?
In post 446, 4burner wrote:And his flip and my flip are not linked in any fashion, and I'm not trying to ride RA townvibes from anyone. If one of us is scum, the other could be, or the other could be town.
In post 335, 4burner wrote:
@Ollie- Comes in swinging, takes a tone I really don't like, and then tries to game a Mod on a site he's only pretty just freshly joined? Unless he knows them from offsite or something similar. Basically I'm thinking scum due to Whiskers/Liverpool/Mod stuff ala Guyett. And never actually voted Whiskers despite agreeing with the anti-whiskers stuff from memory. Votes BRO over very little, comparatively.
So I've got my scumteam as Guyett/Ollie/Yiley, which I'm scarily confident in for a D2 read. But everyone else is basically town bar a few nulls, so let's see how this shakes out.
In post 388, 4burner wrote:Plus,you keep talking to Guyett. So. I don't know what you want from me.
Right, that'll do. VOTE: Ollie because you started bad, then just got worse. Guyett can wait til tomorrow. Yiley the day after.
In post 407, theelkspeaks wrote:
Guyett and Whiskers are making me unhappy with the way they're talking about the confirm-Liverpool incident, but I'm leaning on the side of it being playstyle more than alignment. Because of that, Ollie's discussion of them feels like a scum maybe fishing for a lynch.
Vote: Ollie
In post 448, BROseidon wrote:Yeah that claim is bullshit.
In post 449, BROseidon wrote:4burner wouldn't be my first choice to hammer, but one I'm okay with.
In post 467, Red Arrow wrote:I'd be open to hammering
In post 469, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I need to catch up thoroughly but I have skimmed.
Can someone clarify who is on Ollie wagon please because Ollie is town as fuck.
In post 469, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I need to catch up thoroughly but I have skimmed.
Can someone clarify who is on Ollie wagon pleasebecause Ollie is town as fuck.
In post 468, Deux wrote:In post 467, Red Arrow wrote:I'd be open to hammering
Noted.
It's definitely not the perfect scum claim btw. It generally results in a policy lynch. What other role would I be as Southampon? Have you thought about that?Any thoughts on what I produced from my PM? I take it you think that's a lie too? Would you like to analyze that for us?
Does anyone else have an opinion on my role reveal? A ridiculous lack of actual in depth discussion going on about it.