NY 179: Cute and Fluffy Mafia (Town Win)

[I Am Innocent]

Hey Nero, ur obviously caught up, how about a vote? And since u hinted me, how about explaining why?

Not feeling TDA folks. My gut is feeling queasy over the following 4 players so far: flubbernugget, yuni, Nero, and pacman.

[Albert B. Rampage]

TDA + IAI

[I Am Innocent]

I <3 u too

[Garmr]

But at least Kid A is probably town.

Makes me want to lynch tda even more. It odds timing he said that after he was accused of omgusing everyone who voted him.

[Flubbernugget]

VOTE: TDA

Though I do find it very interesting that dragonspawn never called out TDA on his misrep and actually tried to argue it as a genuine case.

DGB hopping on the misrep is also yucky.

[Flubbernugget]

Spoiler: dragonspawn and TDA stuffs that ended up being a bit long because quotes and redundancy(?)

I'm buddies with someone I don't know

I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.

if you don't know then you clearly can't read. But we both know you can since you managed to edit the post and cut off half the question as well as the request for you to produce some sort of reasoning for your accusation that I was buddying someone who I still haven't even seen a post from.

the question at this point is why go to the lengths of making an accusation, then editing the post asking you to back it up to try to incriminate me. It doesn't make any sense. It's also pretty darn scummy. But is that because you are scum o just completely insane and dishonest? I'm not sure yet. But you've definitely attracted my attention.

so would you please answer the original question of why you think I'm buddying Nero? I fugue the more you talk the easier it will be to determine your alignment.

I see dragonspawn as somewhat scummy, but not exactly in the same way as TDA does. dragonspawn seemed to have started to get serious on getting scum reads a bit early, so dragonspawn's post that seems to be "on trial", seems to have taken place around the time he really began reading into people's posts (#27 #44 (not sure if derping around on #44 or just..)) and I think it's his full reaction that's the problem:

Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.

I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet?

I'd love to see the reasoning

The end part there is way more scummy than the single part that TDA edited ("I'm buddies with someone I don't know"). Especially the bolded part. It shows defensiveness. TDA's post was obviously him derping around. If dragonspawn's reply was ("I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet. Best buddies lel") then it would have been okay. But that bolded part shows him taking TDA's RVS lulz seriously.

I can see where TDA was coming from, but the editing of the post was awkward and actually hurt his case, I think. It doesn't capture the seriousness of dragonspawn's post. If TDA is town, he's not doing a very good job after doing that. I can almost smell the bw.

Of course, it is entirely possible that dragonspawn is a "little bit too serious town" and TDA is scum trying to take advantage of that, but ended up steering his "suspicions" in a weird place. "I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to" takes that certain edited part of dragonspawn's post too seriously. It's just a weird scum-read.

Or they're both town who take things a little too seriously. Who knows.

Not sure if I quite got my point across, and I may have been redundant. Anyway I think I'll hold out a bit longer and see how this turns out.
Oh, and I guess I should end these turtle shenanigans.
UNVOTE: firebound12

Had dragonspawn not responded so aggressively rvs would have been dragged out even longer than need be.

[dragonspawn]

If he'd just said something about Nero not having posted yet, there wouldn't be a problem.

I did. In the question you cut apart.

[dragonspawn]

VOTE: TDA

Though I do find it very interesting that dragonspawn never called out TDA on his misrep and actually tried to argue it as a genuine case.

DGB hopping on the misrep is also yucky.

how didn't I call him out on it?

[dragonspawn]

Spoiler: dragonspawn and TDA stuffs that ended up being a bit long because quotes and redundancy(?)

I'm buddies with someone I don't know

I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.

if you don't know then you clearly can't read. But we both know you can since you managed to edit the post and cut off half the question as well as the request for you to produce some sort of reasoning for your accusation that I was buddying someone who I still haven't even seen a post from.

the question at this point is why go to the lengths of making an accusation, then editing the post asking you to back it up to try to incriminate me. It doesn't make any sense. It's also pretty darn scummy. But is that because you are scum o just completely insane and dishonest? I'm not sure yet. But you've definitely attracted my attention.

so would you please answer the original question of why you think I'm buddying Nero? I fugue the more you talk the easier it will be to determine your alignment.

I see dragonspawn as somewhat scummy, but not exactly in the same way as TDA does. dragonspawn seemed to have started to get serious on getting scum reads a bit early, so dragonspawn's post that seems to be "on trial", seems to have taken place around the time he really began reading into people's posts (#27 #44 (not sure if derping around on #44 or just..)) and I think it's his full reaction that's the problem:

Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.

I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet?

I'd love to see the reasoning

The end part there is way more scummy than the single part that TDA edited ("I'm buddies with someone I don't know"). Especially the bolded part. It shows defensiveness. TDA's post was obviously him derping around. If dragonspawn's reply was ("I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet. Best buddies lel") then it would have been okay. But that bolded part shows him taking TDA's RVS lulz seriously.

I can see where TDA was coming from, but the editing of the post was awkward and actually hurt his case, I think. It doesn't capture the seriousness of dragonspawn's post. If TDA is town, he's not doing a very good job after doing that. I can almost smell the bw.

Of course, it is entirely possible that dragonspawn is a "little bit too serious town" and TDA is scum trying to take advantage of that, but ended up steering his "suspicions" in a weird place. "I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to" takes that certain edited part of dragonspawn's post too seriously. It's just a weird scum-read.

Or they're both town who take things a little too seriously. Who knows.

Not sure if I quite got my point across, and I may have been redundant. Anyway I think I'll hold out a bit longer and see how this turns out.
Oh, and I guess I should end these turtle shenanigans.
UNVOTE: firebound12

Had dragonspawn not responded so aggressively rvs would have been dragged out even longer than need be.

you can't give me all the credit. Without tda saying stupid things I wouldn't have needed to say anything. I dislike stupid reasoning

[dragonspawn]

VOTE: tda

I find quote editing scummy behavior so the best evidence we have so far is tda.

plus id like to see where this wagon goes.

[dragonspawn]

Did we catch scum already? Huh. Good work team.
Judging by that VC, ABR is probably town too, which is fun.

did we? I'm not sure. We have some leads though.

who are you voting for?

[TheDudeAbides]

But at least Kid A is probably town.

Makes me want to lynch tda even more. It odds timing he said that after he was accused of omgusing everyone who voted him.

I also timed it after Kid A posted, so that's cute.
I think he voting because of some foolish belief that talking about one's self is scummy, and I think if he was scum, he would have made sure to say that rather than hang a vague vote on the wagon.

On the other hand, pacman pushing the wagon without voting gets a frowny face.

VOTE: TDA

Though I do find it very interesting that dragonspawn never called out TDA on his misrep and actually tried to argue it as a genuine case.

DGB hopping on the misrep is also yucky.

Since there is no misrep this is dumb. I in no way changed the meaning of dragonspawn's post.
The first part was the disingenuous part (where he talked about not knowing Nero Cain), the second part (where he talked about Nero Cain not posting) I don't have a problem with. The fact that the second part is there is irrelevant because of how the word "and" works.

VOTE: tda

I find quote editing scummy behavior so the best evidence we have so far is tda.

plus id like to see where this wagon goes.

I can assure you that quote editing is not scummy.

[Flubbernugget]

VOTE: TDA

Though I do find it very interesting that dragonspawn never called out TDA on his misrep and actually tried to argue it as a genuine case.

DGB hopping on the misrep is also yucky.

how didn't I call him out on it?

84 nvmnd

[dragonspawn]

So editing a quote to say something it doesn't mean isn't scummy?

[Kid A]

Hey Nero, ur obviously caught up, how about a vote? And since u hinted me, how about explaining why?

Not feeling TDA folks. My gut is feeling queasy over the following 4 players so far: flubbernugget, yuni, Nero, and pacman.

DBG why aren't you voting TDA?

[Kid A]

didnt mean to quote that

[Albert B. Rampage]

But at least Kid A is probably town.

Makes me want to lynch tda even more. It odds timing he said that after he was accused of omgusing everyone who voted him.

Agree

[TheDudeAbides]

So editing a quote to say something it doesn't mean isn't scummy?

That didn't happen.

[TheDudeAbides]

Flubber joins the list of people who don't know what and means.

[dragonspawn]

So editing a quote to say something it doesn't mean isn't scummy?

That didn't happen.

so everyone is imagining that you cut a question in half, pulled it out of context as a response to accusation, made it a statement to try to make it look like I am claiming to buddy someone who hadn't posted at the time? I suppose all the votes for you based on this not happening aren't really there either?

if you really believe that nonsense there is no reasoning with you

[Albert B. Rampage]

This is not the time for discussion. This is the time for quicklynch and hammertime.

[AlternateAccount]

Flubber joins the list of people who don't know what and means.

When I get home I'm going to post an image of bill Clinton talking about the definition of the word "is" is. Until then vomit smilies to evilpacman and drippinggoofball for calling people scum but not voting or pressuring their suspicions.

[The Dream Weaver]

bump

[The Dream Weaver]

bump

[The Dream Weaver]

bump