Open 587 - Nightless Vengeful Mayhem [Game Over]

[Wisdom]

Vote Count 1.18

Albert B. Rampage (2)

-

pisskop, Teapot

Sup-Zero (1)

-

Albert B. Rampage

texcat (1)

-

Herodotus

Not Voting:

theslimer3, Sup-Zero, Morgan, TheCow, texcat, vettrock, BBMolla

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2015-02-15 21:36:32).

[BBmolla]

VOTE: Albert

[pisskop]

It appears to either mention relogin and/or return after inactivity.

Id vengekill her

vote: texcat

We were/are going to kill ABR for not posting or w.e. .

[texcat]

VOTE: Herodotus WTF? You don't understand how it works, and it appears unreliable, but you vote for me anyway?


I do have a browser window on my desktop with a tab for each game that I'm playing and it stays on 24/7. I do the same thing on my Kindle. I have no idea which one said that I was here while I was sleeping. My desktop occasionally reboots itself at midnight if it has installed updates, but it doesn't look like it did last night. I use my Kindle every night to read a few pages in my book before falling asleep.

[Sup-Zero]

Huh.

archaebob, read the game spoilers you dummy.

Vote: Sup Zero

y

[texcat]

I know NK analysis is generally unfruitful, but I feel compelled to do it anyway... Looking back at Arch, nothing stands out as a reason for scum to kill him. He was at one time on all of the major wagons, Vettrock, ABR, Teapot, even Herodotus. He started the case on Vettrock, but never seemed to go back to it or push it after it fizzled. He did go back to ABR, but his vote was still only L-2. I'm not sure how much danger he was really in. I'm thinking it might have been to throw enough suspicion on ABR to get him lynched.

[Herodotus]

Your posting implied you hadn't been on for over a day, while the site implied you were on just minutes before the kill. Even if it's unreliable, it's not 28 hours worth of unreliable, as your own statement agrees.

I don't like to use out-of-game factors, and wouldn't have voted you if I previously thought you were town. I hoped you would have more to say about the game.

Preview edit: see you posted again, gtg, feel free to post more if you have more to say

[vettrock]

So at this point, Either scum either shot archbob to derail the ABR wagon, or to make it look like they were derailing the ABR wagon (which would point to a Teapot or Herodotus scum), or it was just something to throw some confusion into the mix.

I think scum would get the most benefit by derailing the ABR wagon, and also saying, they wouldn't be that obvious about it.

Given ABR's previous behavior I'm still leaning towards him.

I personally don't put a lot of weight in the last visited information. I also have the game open on my phone web browser, which skews my last visit time. I also not sure how much info a texcat lynch would provide.

I'm going to do some more re-reading and come back with a vote.

[pisskop]

I may note be able to respond regularly or in-depth within the next day or two, what with the holiday and the snowstorm tonight.

[Sup-Zero]

Phonepost. We have literally no time to pick a new lynch.

VOTE: ABR

For not explaining why Molla was personally interested in lynching you and for inexplicably voting me for no reason.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Well I'm killing Sup Zero unless anyone has any objections.

[Sup-Zero]

Why?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Because nobody objects.

[Herodotus]

I don't think the kill was likely based on either wagon derailment or derailment WIFOM, I think it was more based on archae looking townie to so many people.

Looking back, Sup-Zero, you have me a little paranoid about buddying.

[Sup-Zero]

@ABR: That's a lame reason to shoot somebody. Do you really think that's a good shot for that reason?

@Hero: Where and why does that bother you?

[Albert B. Rampage]

I think everyone is pretty much okay with you dying. Do you disagree?

[Herodotus]

Two things - the vote for Astinus because they would be a good player to pay attention to, without follow up.

Also, your response to the votes on me. That one isn't so bad, it just seemed odd.

[Sup-Zero]

I think everyone is pretty much okay with you dying. Do you disagree?

Yes, I think that's a really bad reason to shoot somebody.

@Hero: Astinus stopped playing, so I don't know what you're expecting there.

[vettrock]

After re-reading, I don't really see enough to change my opinion on ABR. I can't see anything other than some kiind of WIFROM reason to change after the kill.

VOTE: ABR

I'm not sure Sup is the best vengekill, although I'm not sure who is better. I'm leaning towards that not mattering since scum don't get a vengekill, but as this is D1, the probability of being wrong is still pretty high. Going with the lurkers: TheCow or slimer is one option. Teapot would give us some information as the other major wagon. It will be easier to determine when we actually see you flip, as us debating who the vengekill would be is potentially influencing scum voting (or even town that doesn't want to get killed even if they are scum reading ABR).

[Albert B. Rampage]

vote: rampage

[Sup-Zero]

Well if he's town then I'm getting shot.

W/e. Kinda lame but he doesn't seem interested in finding a good one so.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Now that my towniness is no longer in question, my biggest decision will be to choose who to kill. I think vettrock, sup zero or texcat. Those are the three that stand out the most to me as scum.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Sup zero do you think vettrock or texcat is scum?

[Sup-Zero]

I'd argue against my own death since you're only killing me because it's "safe" but meh.

Why vettrock or texcat?

Pedit: I think texcat could be, maybe. I doubt vettrock is scum at this point. Walk me through what you're thinking.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Well, alright. I'll give you a pass if you say you're sorry for voting for me, and you carry on tomorrow trying to lynch texcat for me.