elusive wrote:NakedJogger, he was reading at a point and also he knows certain players meta. I don't know why all your scum reads are so easy. Easy here is players who's natural style is not all deductive logic or psychological reaction testing.
I know this wasn't directed at me, but I am curious. Just because someone knows some players' metas, and read some parts but not all of a game, does that make them of ample mind to vote accurately?
I would venture to say that if people don't understand the context of recent events, it's hard for them to get involved in recent events. I sympathize with Grib because I'm behind too as a replacement but I know that if I don't get a grasp on these wagons and the current mindset of everyone at the moment then I'm going to fall behind and be marginalized into lurking. Simply because posting would make me look and feel really stupid if I don't know what's going on! That's my current struggle, and I can understand Grib's.
However, Grib, I don't agree with just not reading. It'll be faster to read and catch up on the main events of the recent history of the game than it would be to throw yourself into the mix and struggle until things make sense. It would take longer for you to just throw yourself in and adapt fully to the situation than it would to just ISO the vote counts and read 8-10 posts before and after each one, at least.
And even if you
can
just jump into the water and start swimming, you'll be disoriented no matter what happens. You'll inevitably swim in the wrong direction. By this, I mean even if you jump into the game and hope to find your bearing, you'll still be missing information which may ultimately result in you pushing wagons for no good reason or making yourself look like a scum.
Moral of the story, kids, is to read a damn book.
This message has been sponsored by your local library.
![Image](http://rainiernew.wpengine.com/yurts/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/01/The_more_you_know_banner.jpg)