Oh thats not suspicious or anything, nope not at all.CrashTextDummie wrote:Oy Glork, who should we lynch?
Open 30 - Fire and Ice (Game Over!) - before 470
-
-
Vendagoat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 199
- Joined: April 3, 2007
-
-
Glork Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Posts: 14106
- Joined: July 13, 2005
- Location: Dance into the fire
No reason not to finish off Xyzzy now.
Mert, Sefer, and Crub are prolly the other three scums. We should definitely lynch all of them today.-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
The first day of creation is nearly over (Deadline in ~80 hours), and the scumz are all still alive. Theshould really cast someone into darkness before the day ends...townies
Official Vote Count #4.
xyzzy [4] (Mert,Glork,Pbug,Crub)
AutumnEvenings{AE} [2](Stewie, CTD)
PBuG [2](Wiz, AE)
Mert [1](MBL)
Glork[1](Sefer)
Sefer[1](xyzzy)
Not Voting[1](Vendagoat)
With 12 alive, It will take 7 to Lynch.
---
Notes:
Hey, I'm back from vacation. The beach was great, thanks for asking.
YB, thanks, and good job while I was away!
I have prodded all those who have not posted in the last 100 hours, with especially nasty prods to those who have posted only once all game...
A few players, particularly a certain LoudMouthLee, are quite eager to get into the game, and if the players I prod do not contribute (or if they -- or anyone -- have lost interest andwantto be replaced), that could certainly be arranged...
I remind the town that they are allotted exactlyoneone-week deadline extension for the entirety of the game, and that I will employ it if a majority of the players PM me asking for one.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Stewie Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: July 16, 2003
- Location: Canada
Well, there's only 80 hours left, and as much as I'd like to have more time to talk this through, it will probably be better to leave the extension for later in the game. So unless something happens to change my mind, I'll be switching my vote over to xyzzy soon, as he seems to be the best choice for today.-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Sefer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 294
- Joined: September 10, 2006
I'd completely forgotten that we had static deadlines in this game.Unvote, vote: xyzzyfor his earlier overreactions and more recent jumping about. I agree that we should save our extension for later on.[url=http://www.greylabyrinth.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?p=419266]Sign up for theHeroes Mafia Mega at Grey Labyrinth[/url]-
-
Vendagoat
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
-
Glork Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Posts: 14106
- Joined: July 13, 2005
- Location: Dance into the fire
FoS: MBL
"I'm going to put this guy at Lynch -1, but I don't have an intent to lynch. If he gets lynched, it's someone else's fault."-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
It is likely that I will go with a player's intent if they unvote but do not say who they are unvoting. It is less likely that I will go with a player's "intent" if they do not unvote and try to place an additional vote.3 ) If you wish to change your vote, bold an unvote for the player you were voting and vote for the new player you are going to be voting. For example,unvote: Guardian, vote: YogurtBandit. If you do not unvote in this format, your vote will not be counted.
Translation: Please remember to unvote .Last edited by Guardian on Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
LoudmouthLee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: February 15, 2005
- Location: New York City
-
-
LoudmouthLee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: February 15, 2005
- Location: New York City
This bothers me... especially when, on page 3, you say this:CrashTextDummie wrote:Word on the street has it that Glork has a firm and smooth butt.
IGMEOY: Glork's butt
Everyone voting for Glork is highly suspect. I mean, look at those magnificent buns!
Vote: xyzzy
So.. there hasn't been a night. There is no masonry in this game.. and you've already made *2* references to Glork's innocence. Do you know something that I magically do not?CrashTextDummie wrote:Oy Glork, who should we lynch?
Next points....
I'm still a subscriber to the "Third vote on the bandwagon is scum" tell a-la-Jeep... Sue me if you don't agree. You didn't post any rationale. None at all. When pressed, you give the weak response of:Stewie wrote:unvote, vote autumn evenings
(After a double check, MBL had already moved his vote and Stewie was #2 (but could have been #3) and CtD was #3 (could have been #4). This fits my thoughts perfectly.)
That's really weak, Stewie. Just my opinion, especially I believe (I could be wrong) that's a really weak reason to put a 3rd vote on someone. But CtD's next move absolutely BAFFLES me...Stewie wrote:
Trying to get a reaction; didn't get it.AutumnEvenings wrote: Stewie, care to elaborate?
I absolutely do NOT understand this move. Stewie was looking for AE's reaction, and then, you vote her as well for even LESS of a reason that Stewie voted her!CrashTextDummie wrote:Unvote, Vote: AutumnEvenings
How's that for a reaction?
It absolutely bothes me when we disagree so fevereshly.Glork wrote:No reason not to finish off Xyzzy now.
Mert, Sefer, and Crub are prolly the other three scums. We should definitely lynch all of them today.
Vote: CtD
FoS: Stewie
IGMEOY: Glork
Glork didn't do anything wrong in particular, but just looking at CtD's relationship with Glork makes me wish to look at Glork a little closer."LML = Mafia God" - Pie Is Good
"LML returns, plays one game, wins a Scummie, then leaves again!" - Primate-
-
Glork Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Posts: 14106
- Joined: July 13, 2005
- Location: Dance into the fire
LmL, I believe that's what you would call a "buddy-up tactic" from CTD. Also, I mostly just looked at the player list and picked names upon answering CTD. The "no reason not to finish off Xyzzy now" was little more than a refernce to BJ-style play, but lo and behold, we find Xyzzy at L-1 a mere three days before deadline.
Unvote, Vote: CTD, as I'm willing to follow LmL's lead for the time being. ComplementaryFoS: MBL/Crubfor the timing and manner in which they joined the Xyzzy-wagon.FoS: Seferfrom his overreaction earlier.
That's about the best I can give right now.-
-
Stewie Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: July 16, 2003
- Location: Canada
1. You yourself said later that it was actually the second vote, so I can't understand why you didn't delete it and start again, abandoning that point. It's not as if it was a simulpost, and I would have been the third but MBL beat me with the unvote, so it was the second. There were hours between his unvote and my vote.LoudmouthLee wrote:
1. I'm still a subscriber to the "Third vote on the bandwagon is scum" tell a-la-Jeep... Sue me if you don't agree. 2. You didn't post any rationale. None at all. When pressed, you give the weak response of:Stewie wrote:unvote, vote autumn evenings
(After a double check, MBL had already moved his vote and Stewie was #2 (but could have been #3) and CtD was #3 (could have been #4). This fits my thoughts perfectly.)
3. That's really weak, Stewie. Just my opinion, especially I believe (I could be wrong) that's a really weak reason to put a 3rd vote on someone. But CtD's next move absolutely BAFFLES me...Stewie wrote:
Trying to get a reaction; didn't get it.AutumnEvenings wrote: Stewie, care to elaborate?
2. Ok, next time I'll vote and then I'll say "I'm voting for you because I want to see if I get a reaction" and see if that works.
3. There wasn't much going on, and I wanted to get the game going. A reaction vote seemed like a good idea.-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
-
-
MrBuddyLee Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Slightly better than 50-50
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: March 2, 2006
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
No, I have faith in this town not to do that. And it'd be 2nd-most my fault if it in fact did happen.Glork wrote:"I'm going to put this guy at Lynch -1, but I don't have an intent to lynch. If he gets lynched, it's someone else's fault."
You can thank me tomorrow for giving you something to actually analyze from this terribly short day--if we're short on time, things have to happen quickly, and voila, they are.
vote: Crubfor quick protection of xyzzy.dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
-
-
CrashTextDummie Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: June 22, 2006
- Location: Switzerland
I did?LoudmouthLee wrote:So.. there hasn't been a night. There is no masonry in this game.. and you've already made *2* references to Glork's innocence.
The first reference was to Glork's butt, and nothing else. It's called random voting.
The second "reference" was a question directed at Glork on who he wants to lynch considering we're facing a deadline. Nothing more.
You know as well as I do that Glork is a difficult fellow to read, and I've decided to do a little probing in his direction in an attempt to get an idea of where he stands.
Actually, I did have a reason, I just neglected to share it until now.I absolutely do NOT understand this move. Stewie was looking for AE's reaction, and then, you vote her as well for even LESS of a reason that Stewie voted her!
I found it odd that she addressed Stewie's "reaction vote", yet completely ignored MBL's, and her Post 51, particularly the first paragraph, had a weird vibe to it.
Quite obviously, I was looking for a reaction myself, from Stewie and from AE. Stewie seems indifferent, and interestingly enough, so does AE herself, considering it was the 3rd vote on her.
Here's a question for Glork:
How come it took LML to comment for you to take note of my "buddy-up tactics"?-
-
LoudmouthLee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: February 15, 2005
- Location: New York City
That question is seconded.CtD wrote: Here's a question for Glork:
How come it took LML to comment for you to take note of my "buddy-up tactics"?
Sorry, but I believe we had this conversation before, CtD...CtD wrote: The first reference was to Glork's butt, and nothing else. It's called random voting.
*METAGAME TIME*
When someone plays as scum, they sometimes say things out loud that they do not mean to say. For instance, a scum member would say out loud that they need mod clarification of their role.
I feel very strongly about this following tell, especially when the previous quote was placed in front of CtD....
As for Stewie...CtD, page 1 wrote: Everyone voting for Glork is highly suspect.
#1) The point still stood. It wasn't that you were exactly the third vote, but you were the third person to vote for AE. Once a person votes for someone, they do not have the same hesitation to vote for them again. I can only speak for myself. Once a case has been made that I agree with, I am more apt to vote for that person, whether or not my vote is currently there.Stewie wrote: 1. You yourself said later that it was actually the second vote, so I can't understand why you didn't delete it and start again, abandoning that point. It's not as if it was a simulpost, and I would have been the third but MBL beat me with the unvote, so it was the second. There were hours between his unvote and my vote.
2. Ok, next time I'll vote and then I'll say "I'm voting for you because I want to see if I get a reaction" and see if that works.
3. There wasn't much going on, and I wanted to get the game going. A reaction vote seemed like a good idea.
#2 and #3) So.. you prefer the "Reaction Vote" over the "Make a Case" idea. Very interesting. Sometimes, the cases overanalyze... But I feel much more comfortable making a case and seeing how they respond to allegations rather than a simple vote.
@CtD: Talk me into voting Glork over you. I will be on a massive campaign to lynch one of the both of you. I'm feeling Stewie, too... but.. c'est la vie. I feel less strongly on him than the both of you."LML = Mafia God" - Pie Is Good
"LML returns, plays one game, wins a Scummie, then leaves again!" - Primate-
-
CrashTextDummie Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: June 22, 2006
- Location: Switzerland
You're severely underestimating me.LML wrote:Sorry, but I believe we had this conversation before, CtD...
*METAGAME TIME*
When someone plays as scum, they sometimes say things out loud that they do not mean to say. For instance, a scum member would say out loud that they need mod clarification of their role.
This is not scumchat, you'd have to lookveryhard to ever see me slip as scum on the forum (let alone in my first post of the game), and even then you'd probably come out empty.
You may not be inclined to believe me, but I was about as deliberate as I could get when I posted my first post of the game. I had formulated it pretty much verbatimbefore I even got my role, just based on the fact that the game had Glork in it, and I <3 him, and I wanted to see his reaction. I was actually considering waiting on posting because he only had one vote at the time, but figured it was enough for the joke to work.
I know you're fond of analyzing the random voting stage, but I'll tell you flat out that you got it wrong.
Considering I'm not convinced about Glork at this point myself, I'll kindly pass on that offer. You'd be wasting your time if you campaigned to lynch me, but I'm pretty sure we'll be able to lynch someone else without your help.@CtD: Talk me into voting Glork over you. I will be on a massive campaign to lynch one of the both of you. I'm feeling Stewie, too... but.. c'est la vie. I feel less strongly on him than the both of you.-
-
LoudmouthLee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: February 15, 2005
- Location: New York City
I heart quite a few people in this game, yourself included, but that doesn't change the fact that you have, twice, buddied up to Glork through various methods. You can tell me that you've had that post formulated for numerous days, but the truth of the matter is that i can only go with what's in front of me.You may not be inclined to believe me, but I was about as deliberate as I could get when I posted my first post of the game. I had formulated it pretty much verbatim before I even got my role, just based on the fact that the game had Glork in it, and I <3 him, and I wanted to see his reaction. I was actually considering waiting on posting because he only had one vote at the time, but figured it was enough for the joke to work.
I'm dully unimpressed with the Xyzzy wagon. Can someone summarize it besides we're "Lynching Uncle Xyzzy because he's Uncle Xyzzy"?
And, CtD, you are not being underestimated. Even the best players (and I consider you one of them) are capable of making severe D1 slips. Especially in the Random Voting part of the game, where Scum tend to make their worst mistakes...
I know the town could lynch others, especially couples with the fact that we have so precious little time left in D1, but unless someone could give me anything remotely solid (read: as solid as my case in CtD) I have no reason to change my vote and I implore the rest of the town to look at CtD or Glork here."LML = Mafia God" - Pie Is Good
"LML returns, plays one game, wins a Scummie, then leaves again!" - Primate-
-
CrashTextDummie Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: June 22, 2006
- Location: Switzerland
Let me see if I get this straight:
You think I'm scum with Glork and subconsciously let that slip in my very first post of the game by making multiple references to the quality of his behind and how no one should vote for him because of it. Is that about it?
I'm a bit confused, because "buddying up", in the traditional sense, is not something done between two scum players on the same team.[i]Mgm laughed nervously, his cheeks flushing in the faintest of blushes. "Patrick... I only wanted to be with you... that's why I put the game to night, so Glork would get killed."[/i] - the heartwarming conclusion of Face to Face Mafia-
-
xyzzy they/themcomical third optionthey/them
- comical third option
- comical third option
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Pronoun: they/them
- Location: northern VA
I, also, have no idea how a wagon started on me. I think it's because no one understands my ludicrously awesome tactics.
CTD, you're not getting the point.-
-
Glork Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Posts: 14106
- Joined: July 13, 2005
- Location: Dance into the fire
You may accuse me of being a smartass, but I'd say it's probably because I didn't notice the first time around. Sometimes a little fresh perspective is a good thing.CTD wrote:Here's a question for Glork:
How come it took LML to comment for you to take note of my "buddy-up tactics"?-
-
Glork Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Burdened by Proficiency
- Posts: 14106
- Joined: July 13, 2005
- Location: Dance into the fire
Actually,Unvote, Vote: Crub... there really isn't a heck of a lot to go on, but I think that CTD could serve to be useful one way or another, regardless of his alignment.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-