Oh thats not suspicious or anything, nope not at all.CrashTextDummie wrote:Oy Glork, who should we lynch?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
It is likely that I will go with a player's intent if they unvote but do not say who they are unvoting. It is less likely that I will go with a player's "intent" if they do not unvote and try to place an additional vote.3 ) If you wish to change your vote, bold an unvote for the player you were voting and vote for the new player you are going to be voting. For example,unvote: Guardian, vote: YogurtBandit. If you do not unvote in this format, your vote will not be counted.
This bothers me... especially when, on page 3, you say this:CrashTextDummie wrote:Word on the street has it that Glork has a firm and smooth butt.
IGMEOY: Glork's butt
Everyone voting for Glork is highly suspect. I mean, look at those magnificent buns!
Vote: xyzzy
So.. there hasn't been a night. There is no masonry in this game.. and you've already made *2* references to Glork's innocence. Do you know something that I magically do not?CrashTextDummie wrote:Oy Glork, who should we lynch?
I'm still a subscriber to the "Third vote on the bandwagon is scum" tell a-la-Jeep... Sue me if you don't agree. You didn't post any rationale. None at all. When pressed, you give the weak response of:Stewie wrote:unvote, vote autumn evenings
That's really weak, Stewie. Just my opinion, especially I believe (I could be wrong) that's a really weak reason to put a 3rd vote on someone. But CtD's next move absolutely BAFFLES me...Stewie wrote:Trying to get a reaction; didn't get it.AutumnEvenings wrote: Stewie, care to elaborate?
I absolutely do NOT understand this move. Stewie was looking for AE's reaction, and then, you vote her as well for even LESS of a reason that Stewie voted her!CrashTextDummie wrote:Unvote, Vote: AutumnEvenings
How's that for a reaction?
It absolutely bothes me when we disagree so fevereshly.Glork wrote:No reason not to finish off Xyzzy now.
Mert, Sefer, and Crub are prolly the other three scums. We should definitely lynch all of them today.
1. You yourself said later that it was actually the second vote, so I can't understand why you didn't delete it and start again, abandoning that point. It's not as if it was a simulpost, and I would have been the third but MBL beat me with the unvote, so it was the second. There were hours between his unvote and my vote.LoudmouthLee wrote:1. I'm still a subscriber to the "Third vote on the bandwagon is scum" tell a-la-Jeep... Sue me if you don't agree. 2. You didn't post any rationale. None at all. When pressed, you give the weak response of:Stewie wrote:unvote, vote autumn evenings
(After a double check, MBL had already moved his vote and Stewie was #2 (but could have been #3) and CtD was #3 (could have been #4). This fits my thoughts perfectly.)
3. That's really weak, Stewie. Just my opinion, especially I believe (I could be wrong) that's a really weak reason to put a 3rd vote on someone. But CtD's next move absolutely BAFFLES me...Stewie wrote:Trying to get a reaction; didn't get it.AutumnEvenings wrote: Stewie, care to elaborate?
No, I have faith in this town not to do that. And it'd be 2nd-most my fault if it in fact did happen.Glork wrote:"I'm going to put this guy at Lynch -1, but I don't have an intent to lynch. If he gets lynched, it's someone else's fault."
I did?LoudmouthLee wrote:So.. there hasn't been a night. There is no masonry in this game.. and you've already made *2* references to Glork's innocence.
Actually, I did have a reason, I just neglected to share it until now.I absolutely do NOT understand this move. Stewie was looking for AE's reaction, and then, you vote her as well for even LESS of a reason that Stewie voted her!
That question is seconded.CtD wrote: Here's a question for Glork:
How come it took LML to comment for you to take note of my "buddy-up tactics"?
Sorry, but I believe we had this conversation before, CtD...CtD wrote: The first reference was to Glork's butt, and nothing else. It's called random voting.
As for Stewie...CtD, page 1 wrote: Everyone voting for Glork is highly suspect.
#1) The point still stood. It wasn't that you were exactly the third vote, but you were the third person to vote for AE. Once a person votes for someone, they do not have the same hesitation to vote for them again. I can only speak for myself. Once a case has been made that I agree with, I am more apt to vote for that person, whether or not my vote is currently there.Stewie wrote: 1. You yourself said later that it was actually the second vote, so I can't understand why you didn't delete it and start again, abandoning that point. It's not as if it was a simulpost, and I would have been the third but MBL beat me with the unvote, so it was the second. There were hours between his unvote and my vote.
2. Ok, next time I'll vote and then I'll say "I'm voting for you because I want to see if I get a reaction" and see if that works.
3. There wasn't much going on, and I wanted to get the game going. A reaction vote seemed like a good idea.
You're severely underestimating me.LML wrote:Sorry, but I believe we had this conversation before, CtD...
*METAGAME TIME*
When someone plays as scum, they sometimes say things out loud that they do not mean to say. For instance, a scum member would say out loud that they need mod clarification of their role.
Considering I'm not convinced about Glork at this point myself, I'll kindly pass on that offer. You'd be wasting your time if you campaigned to lynch me, but I'm pretty sure we'll be able to lynch someone else without your help.@CtD: Talk me into voting Glork over you. I will be on a massive campaign to lynch one of the both of you. I'm feeling Stewie, too... but.. c'est la vie. I feel less strongly on him than the both of you.
I heart quite a few people in this game, yourself included, but that doesn't change the fact that you have, twice, buddied up to Glork through various methods. You can tell me that you've had that post formulated for numerous days, but the truth of the matter is that i can only go with what's in front of me.You may not be inclined to believe me, but I was about as deliberate as I could get when I posted my first post of the game. I had formulated it pretty much verbatim before I even got my role, just based on the fact that the game had Glork in it, and I <3 him, and I wanted to see his reaction. I was actually considering waiting on posting because he only had one vote at the time, but figured it was enough for the joke to work.
You may accuse me of being a smartass, but I'd say it's probably because I didn't notice the first time around. Sometimes a little fresh perspective is a good thing.CTD wrote:Here's a question for Glork:
How come it took LML to comment for you to take note of my "buddy-up tactics"?