New York 181 -- Game Over


User avatar
Flubbernugget
Flubbernugget
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Flubbernugget
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11751
Joined: June 26, 2014

Post Post #1975 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:27 am

Post by Flubbernugget »

In post 1971, Drixx wrote:What's up with people who can't put forth the effort to make a logical argument? I've practically begged people to pick apart my reasoning, and all I get is willful ignorance (Elusive) and bullshit like what Nik just posted. I've been transparently open and asking for someone to pick apart my logic, and yet the "best" response I get is Nik calling me scum?

If you guys don't have time to play the game at a deeper level than "My indigestion says X is scum and Y is town", then replace out already. It's insulting to those of us spending time and practically begging you all to get involved. If you can show me where my logic went wrong, then please do so. Otherwise, you're just cluttering the thread with more uselessness.


I've posted my interpretation of dw's mindset in making his wake case and offered a compromise, both of which you seemed to ignore.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #1976 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:29 am

Post by texcat »

UNVOTE: Elusive
although I still am convinced that she is lying scum.
But I feel the need to place my vote somewhere more productive
VOTE: Delta


Flubber, from memory, I think the Klingon slot had quite a few votes and was gaining steam.
User avatar
elusive
elusive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
elusive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2867
Joined: January 14, 2015
Location: on hiatus til further notice

Post Post #1977 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:33 am

Post by elusive »

Nikanor, the wagon on dw is built on townie so its easy while Texcat has posted nothing of consequence but her scummates are protecting her.

Drixx, can't do quotes right now. Give me some reasons why you're not on Texcat. She's posting brilliantly so far?

Also vote me if you think I'm scum.

Texcat if you call me lying scum one more time without posting proof I will tear into you with real claws.
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #1978 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:34 am

Post by Nikanor »

Vote: texcat.

sorry cutie.
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
elusive
elusive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
elusive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2867
Joined: January 14, 2015
Location: on hiatus til further notice

Post Post #1979 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:36 am

Post by elusive »

Oh look opportunistic vote jump by Texcat. Surprise.
User avatar
House
House
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
House
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 19605
Joined: September 5, 2014
Location: Home of Top Gun

Post Post #1980 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:38 am

Post by House »

In post 1978, Nikanor wrote:
Vote: texcat.

sorry cutie.


Nice chainsaw. You're too obvious in your defense of your buddy.

Why? Surely you must realize that when Delta flips scum you're up for a date with the gallows shortly after.
The apology that resulted in my indefinite ban:

https://tinyimg.io/i/ZX5Yjhw.png
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #1981 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:40 am

Post by Nikanor »

Drixx, how about you answer for me these questions three:
1) Do you think that Wake's taxcase is going to be decent in any sense of the word?
2) Do you think that texcat was a good choice for Wake's case?
3) Do you think that Wake posting a single case on a single player is going to be adequate or useful contribution?
4) Do you think that DeltaWave thought he could get Wake lynched before the case was posted?
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #1982 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:40 am

Post by Nikanor »

In post 1980, House wrote:
In post 1978, Nikanor wrote:
Vote: texcat.

sorry cutie.


Nice chainsaw. You're too obvious in your defense of your buddy.

Why? Surely you must realize that when Delta flips scum you're up for a date with the gallows shortly after.

Nice chainsaw. You're too obvious in your defense of your buddy.

Why? Surely you must realize that when texcat flips scum you're up for a date with the gallows shortly after.
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 27261
Joined: April 8, 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Post Post #1983 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:09 am

Post by Albert B. Rampage »

I am very suspicious of both delta and nikanor. They are my highest scumreads.

Freeko, maybe he's got tunnel vision on me as a town, I can't tell. Someone objective can say it.
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 27261
Joined: April 8, 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Post Post #1984 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:11 am

Post by Albert B. Rampage »

Nikanor's vote of texcat points to elusive not being scum with him, but is indeed a huge chainsaw defense. I'll go to bat for texcat, I don't want her harmed, especially after taking a huge risk by voting delta.
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 27261
Joined: April 8, 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Post Post #1985 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:12 am

Post by Albert B. Rampage »

I got your back, texcat, stay strong ;)
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
User avatar
Shiro
Shiro
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shiro
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7510
Joined: August 8, 2014
Location: Greece

Post Post #1986 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:18 am

Post by Shiro »

In post 1963, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 1945, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Vig delta tonight if we can't lynch him.

I'm not voting anyone but Delta today.


with what vigilante?


Asked same thing before the answer was. I mean sk


btw has anyone other than Drixx had a valid reason to vote DW other than we just did ?

All the vote on him had been pretty horrible par Drixx

In post 1872, A Royal Saint wrote:VOTE: Deltawave

For plotting out who to kill at end game on like no information.

^Bad reason and pretty pretentius since you are doing the same thing tbh. I wouldn't call what DW had posted at the time information

In post 1880, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Vote: Delta


Let's lynch this guy today, much better chance than House.

In post 1883, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Delta's posts are scummy as hell, especially the latest one where he goes on about "Wakes case will be 30% non committal", just completely trying to discredit Wake for no good reason. Lynch Delta.


ABR is also just as bad since DW has a pretty good reason to discredit wake, What DW was saying is not impossible from paranoid town POV. So yea basically a vote on teh basis of much better chance.

In post 1891, House wrote:k

VOTE: DeltaWave

Look how OMGUSy I am!

Not even worth commenting on this one
especially coming after this
In post 1889, House wrote:Just stop the bullshittery and lynch me so the game can move forward.

All this diarrhea of the mouth is doing nothing but giving scum plenty of room to maneuver.

Cause changing the focus like he did is basically more of what he just said give scum room to maneuvre. I will also add that a little whiel ago he said to ABR to unvote him contrdicting his supposed thoughts alter but w/e

Texcats vote is a vote to be more productive cause DW is the leading wagon. Nothign else on teh matter

Dragon vote is from like a few days ago for totaly unrelated reasons and just parked there

And I think that covers it up

Pretty much nobody but Drixx has an actual reason to vote DW other than the thing to do cause he lashed out on wake
User avatar
elusive
elusive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
elusive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2867
Joined: January 14, 2015
Location: on hiatus til further notice

Post Post #1987 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:19 am

Post by elusive »

@ mod
officially requesting replace, this game isn't worth it
User avatar
Nikanor
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nikanor
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8216
Joined: April 27, 2009
Location: je nais se quo

Post Post #1988 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:20 am

Post by Nikanor »

In post 1984, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Nikanor's vote of texcat points to elusive not being scum with him, but is indeed a huge chainsaw defense. I'll go to bat for texcat, I don't want her harmed, especially after taking a huge risk by voting delta.

Yes, voting the biggest wagon is a huuuuge risk, I expect for her next trick she'll be eating flaming blowfish while skydiving onto a fishing boat in the middle of the Atlantic.
The last time texcat mentioned Delta was when she said that Delta's accusations against Wake had struck a chord with her. She also had an opportunity to agree or disagree with the Delta case here, but instead she used the opportunity to make a half-accusation against elusive.

p-edit elusive nooooooooooooooo
I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!
User avatar
elusive
elusive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
elusive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2867
Joined: January 14, 2015
Location: on hiatus til further notice

Post Post #1989 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:28 am

Post by elusive »

Yeah not dealing with Mod threatening me over referring to Texcat as an It, fuck double standards. If you can call someone a lying scum repeatedly you can deal with being called an It. Or not I guess.
Enjoy the hot mess. GL town.
User avatar
Shiro
Shiro
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shiro
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7510
Joined: August 8, 2014
Location: Greece

Post Post #1990 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:31 am

Post by Shiro »

@Elusive But you are fun company D:

Dun leave ;~;
Image
User avatar
Nobody Special
Nobody Special
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nobody Special
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14479
Joined: January 6, 2010
Location: Not here

Post Post #1991 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:33 am

Post by Nobody Special »

Since you've made it public, I politely requested that you stop referring to her as "it" -- especially after she said she found it insulting, whereupon you told me that if she stops you would stop. Hint: Don't give a moderator an ultimatum. When asked not to do something,
don't do it.


Part of mafia is lying, and being suspected of lying. Whether or not "It" is a choice in the Pronoun field of a player's profile is immaterial.

It is not a double standard, it is basic respect.

Searching for a replacement.
User avatar
elusive
elusive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
elusive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2867
Joined: January 14, 2015
Location: on hiatus til further notice

Post Post #1992 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:43 am

Post by elusive »

I don't mind making things public, considering the history of this game. Fyi, giving players ultimatums such as, "You will not do it again." Doesn't quite result in a happy ending either. Consider it a mod kill for refusal to comply.
User avatar
pisskop
pisskop
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
pisskop
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 31779
Joined: November 14, 2013

Post Post #1993 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:43 am

Post by pisskop »

But it isn't a modkill. Its you placing out. :(
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop.
Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
User avatar
Nobody Special
Nobody Special
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nobody Special
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14479
Joined: January 6, 2010
Location: Not here

Post Post #1994 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:46 am

Post by Nobody Special »

In post 1992, elusive wrote:I don't mind making things public, considering the history of this game. Fyi, giving players ultimatums such as, "You will not do it again." Doesn't quite result in a happy ending either. Consider it a mod kill for refusal to comply.

I can Modkill you if you would prefer.

You have requested replacement, do not post in this thread again.

Oh look, another ultimatum. :roll:
User avatar
Aneninen
Aneninen
He
Very Important Pigeon
User avatar
User avatar
Aneninen
He
Very Important Pigeon
Very Important Pigeon
Posts: 5684
Joined: June 9, 2014
Pronoun: He
Location: Lost in E.B.O.N.Y.

Post Post #1995 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:51 am

Post by Aneninen »

WTF is happening? Another drama?
I'm catching up soon.
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 27261
Joined: April 8, 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Post Post #1996 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:53 am

Post by Albert B. Rampage »

If you modkill elusive, we need to know her alignment, no "neutral survivor" flip nonsense please.
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #1997 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:54 am

Post by texcat »

In post 1985, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I got your back, texcat, stay strong ;)

FOS ABR :cool:
In post 1988, Nikanor wrote:
In post 1984, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Nikanor's vote of texcat points to elusive not being scum with him, but is indeed a huge chainsaw defense. I'll go to bat for texcat, I don't want her harmed, especially after taking a huge risk by voting delta.

Yes, voting the biggest wagon is a huuuuge risk, I expect for her next trick she'll be eating flaming blowfish while skydiving onto a fishing boat in the middle of the Atlantic.
The last time texcat mentioned Delta was when she said that Delta's accusations against Wake had struck a chord with her. She also had an opportunity to agree or disagree with the Delta case here, but instead she used the opportunity to make a half-accusation against elusive.

p-edit elusive nooooooooooooooo

Did you miss the last two pages of my discussion with Flubber?

And Elusive, I did not request mod intervention. And I would have vastly preferred lynching you to having you replace out.
User avatar
elusive
elusive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
elusive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2867
Joined: January 14, 2015
Location: on hiatus til further notice

Post Post #1998 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 10:00 am

Post by elusive »

Modkill me for breaking the rules. Oh look I'm posting. Breaks a real rule instead of nonsense about personal attacks on a shitty player. Mods on this site range from nut job about random nonsense to being normal. Do I get a modkill now? Oh big surprise town side.
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 27261
Joined: April 8, 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Post Post #1999 (ISO) » Mon Mar 09, 2015 10:04 am

Post by Albert B. Rampage »

Dont modkill pls. Elusive leave in peace and take this up with sote admin.
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”