Mini 1652: Sweet Dreams - Game Over!

Count Dooku · Post Post #825 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:53 am

In post 823, pisskop wrote:@CD

there is literally a contradiction of words there.

Where?

Okay, I will explain you what I meant. It looks like you didn't understand me.

I said that I don't want to lynch SW/Titus.
Then I was talking about you.
In 815, I didn't contradict myself.
Maybe the emphasis, or the punctuation was wrong. Or I don't know what.
I said that I didn't said that I didn't want to lynch that slot because the fact that there may be informef scum. Not because of it. Because of something else: I din't want to lynch her, because I think that she is town.
I am sorry if that sentence was ambigous, I am not a native speaker.
So there was no contradiction.

Lapsa · Post Post #826 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:55 am

In post 824, Titus wrote:Pisskop, can you quit drowning the thread over wordplay and lynch the guy who won't give reads at all?

who would that be? o_0

pisskop · Post Post #827 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:56 am

In post 824, Titus wrote:Pisskop, can you quit drowning the thread over wordplay and lynch the guy who won't give reads at all?

You're scum. Town you isnt nearly as placating nor is she as listless.

bji · Post Post #828 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:57 am

In post 824, Titus wrote:Pisskop, can you quit drowning the thread over wordplay and lynch the guy who won't give reads at all?

If we're going to lynch players who won't give reads, I'd prefer one of:

West9
JohnnyFarrar
evilpacman18

Prolapsed Brain has never even demonstrated the ability to make reads, whereas the above have done so but are not participating in a meaningful way in this game, and have all done nothing lately. Probably I'm going to be told that I am naive/unfair, but I think people who have demonstrated that they have a thought process but choose not to use it are better lynch candidates that Prolapsed Brain.

pisskop · Post Post #829 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:59 am

In post 825, Count Dooku wrote:I said that I didn't said that I didn't want to lynch that slot because the fact that there may be informef scum. Not because of it. Because of something else

Okay. And how does the possibility of there being informed scum affect Titus?

There can be town and scum roleblockers, town and scum hated/loved, town and scum doublevoters and jailers. How do these possibilities affect a Titus lynch?

Count Dooku · Post Post #830 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:02 am

In post 829, pisskop wrote:
In post 825, Count Dooku wrote:I said that I didn't said that I didn't want to lynch that slot because the fact that there may be informef scum. Not because of it. Because of something else

Okay. And how does the possibility of there being informed scum affect Titus?

There can be town and scum roleblockers, town and scum hated/loved, town and scum doublevoters and jailers. How do these possibilities affect a Titus lynch?

Again. The same thing. It doesn't affect. This is what I am trying to explain you. Those two different topics have nothing do with eachother. That is what I tried to say in 815 and 825.

pisskop · Post Post #831 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:04 am

In post 830, Count Dooku wrote:I didn't want to lynch that slot because the fact that there may be informef scum. Not because of it.

Okay. My apologies.

You mean 'in spite of'. Like besides there being the chance.

Count Dooku · Post Post #832 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:05 am

In post 830, Count Dooku wrote:
In post 829, pisskop wrote:
In post 825, Count Dooku wrote:I said that I didn't said that I didn't want to lynch that slot because the fact that there may be informef scum. Not because of it. Because of something else

Okay. And how does the possibility of there being informed scum affect Titus?

There can be town and scum roleblockers, town and scum hated/loved, town and scum doublevoters and jailers. How do these possibilities affect a Titus lynch?

Again. The same thing. It doesn't affect. This is what I am trying to explain you. Those two different topics have nothing do with eachother. That is what I tried to say in 815 and 825.

*to you

Titus · Post Post #833 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:11 am

In post 826, Lapsa wrote:
In post 824, Titus wrote:Pisskop, can you quit drowning the thread over wordplay and lynch the guy who won't give reads at all?

who would that be? o_0

Brain because he promised reads and never gave them.

Pisskop, just who have I placated? You're tunnelling. Stop it.

bji · Post Post #834 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:18 am

In post 833, Titus wrote:
In post 826, Lapsa wrote:
In post 824, Titus wrote:Pisskop, can you quit drowning the thread over wordplay and lynch the guy who won't give reads at all?

who would that be? o_0

Brain because he promised reads and never gave them.

Pisskop, just who have I placated? You're tunnelling. Stop it.

I don't think you're going to convince him:

pisskop wrote:
Id put my chips on the line. This is Titusscum or I'll swing myself.

@pisskop: ignoring Titus, can you give reads on the remaining players? Thanks!

pisskop · Post Post #835 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:19 am

In post 833, Titus wrote:Pisskop, just who have I placated? You're tunnelling. Stop it.

Wrong. Tunnel's are long term events.

Delicious that I caught you.

Titus · Post Post #836 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:23 am

Tunnelling is posting a player is scum regardless of reason. Here, you indicated I was placating and restless which isn't true. I want Brain lynched and I am not placating anyone.

@bji, why not? I can either convince pisskop I am town or highlight how stupid his arguments are. Either way, mislynch diverted.

bji · Post Post #837 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:26 am

In post 836, Titus wrote:
@bji, why not? I can either convince pisskop I am town or highlight how stupid his arguments are. Either way, mislynch diverted.

Others have expressed suspicion of you. Your time may be better spent on those who haven't already claimed that they'd rather die than change their vote from you.

Just sayin'.

Titus · Post Post #838 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:32 am

And by showing that there's no reason to suspect me, I do that.

You still didn't answer why SW was scummy to you.

Lapsa · Post Post #839 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:39 am

this is my intent to hammer Titus

Titus · Post Post #840 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:47 am

Why? I have done nothing but try to solve the game. I get why SW subbed out.

pisskop · Post Post #841 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:50 am

What have you tried to 'solve'?
What are your reads even?

Lapsa · Post Post #842 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:52 am

you had a chance and you blew it. sorry, Titus

Titus · Post Post #843 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:58 am

*eyeroll*

I should tell you to read my posts pisskop and buzz off but I am not an ass.

Brain is scum.

Bji town. CD town.

Pisskop is nuts.

That's what I got.

bji · Post Post #844 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:59 am

In post 838, Titus wrote:
You still didn't answer why SW was scummy to you.

Me? I didn't answer? It's in the game history.

Titus · Post Post #845 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:00 am

In post 842, Lapsa wrote:you had a chance and you blew it. sorry, Titus

Bullshit. I have blown up every reason to scumread me.

You can fish for your reactions all day or you can vote scum.

Titus · Post Post #846 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:00 am

In post 844, bji wrote:
In post 838, Titus wrote:
You still didn't answer why SW was scummy to you.

Me? I didn't answer? It's in the game history.

And like that tells me anything...

Gliffie · Post Post #847 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:07 am

What the fuck is going on. Correct me if I'm wrong: Titus is a known sharp player, completely and utterlty missunderstands pisskop, this is apparently scum slip of the century, suddenly L-1? This seems so dumb on both ends. Titus, you are paying attention to the game right? Your posts feel so unfocused. I really don't like this wagon either. It's so incredibly rushed. Why are VDA, P Brain and Lapsa on it? Is just just #YOLOSWAGWAGON or did I miss your actual reasons? Ari's jump onto the wagon feels really opportunitsic too. Oh, and bji is back. Man...

For the record, I've been neighborized by scum and I've been a scum neighborizer. Scum neighborizer isn't that outlandish. Would confirming the role make Ari more or less confirmed town for you, pisskop? I don't think it will. Ari lynch is still the best option, so my vote stays.

Lapsa wrote:
this is my intent to hammer Titus

Good luck with that. Do you have two votes?

pisskop · Post Post #848 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:09 am

In post 845, Titus wrote:You can fish for your reactions all day or you can vote scum.

o,o

Ari lynch will not tell me anything. Youve been one on this site? Links?

Titus · Post Post #849 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:13 am

I will suppose the latter is for G there as I have never been a neighborizer.

I will chill for a day or two to calm down and refocus.