In post 1696, House wrote:In post 1694, Grib wrote:Besides, it's mostly his townreads I'm feeling.
Fair enough.
Why are you no longer feeling his PeaceBringer scumread?
In post 1696, House wrote:In post 1694, Grib wrote:Besides, it's mostly his townreads I'm feeling.
Fair enough.
In post 1688, Klingoncelt wrote:I do the rabid dog thing when I'm utterly convinced.
In post 1705, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1688, Klingoncelt wrote:I do the rabid dog thing when I'm utterly convinced.
AND this is the fucking problem. Like acording to your ownself when you believe in a read you go after it but you find me scummy for going after my read? Hello cong diss.
In post 1706, House wrote:So you believe that everybody plays the game the exact same way?
In post 1709, Nero Cain wrote:but gut is telling me
vote:Xay
TO ME TOWN!
House is still scum as well
In post 1710, Grib wrote:VOTE: XAYZECK
whee
I may unvote pending Rubicon's response + my own reread/catchup but for now, me likey.
In post 1716, Grib wrote:Do you think he's town?
In post 1704, Grib wrote:Rubicon, you have Xayzeck as a townread but your only mention of him was in 1601. Share your wisdom with me, otherwise I'm going to take matters into my own hands.
In post 1718, PeaceBringer wrote:In post 1716, Grib wrote:Do you think he's town?
most likely town, as I don't see garmr dumping a replacement with his behavior if scum...
he is either as he claimed or VT... since he was neither day 1 lynched or vigged, now just a distraction and Xay is a waste of space. However, the chances are higher that he is town than scum... if we have a vig he would be perfect vig fodder... tunneling on the slot which is not going anywhere, is that tunneling and avoiding other engagement...