New York 181 -- Game Over

texcat · Post Post #4275 (ISO) » Mon May 04, 2015 4:10 pm

In post 4273, DeltaWave wrote:I'm conflicted. I didn't think the "We" was a scumtell but I think DS's explanation is BS. lol

Ugh. I've got to agree.

dragonspawn · Post Post #4276 (ISO) » Mon May 04, 2015 5:20 pm

You guys want me to make something up that sounds decent? For what purpose?

if you guys are seriously to the point where we are discussing a typing error, we are seriously in trouble. Because this game continues whether I'm in it or not. I volunteered to be the lynch two game days ago and you guys weren't interested. Not volunteering this time but I won't lose sleep if I don't. But you need to get your acts together if you kill me. Heck we all need to get our acts together. The only reason we are even in this game is because that serial killer got some lucky scum kills. It hasn't been from our fabulous detective skills. If flubber hadnt killed himself who knows if we would have gotten a final vote for him.

anen, are you going to tell me your other scum suspects? Pisskop are you going to get off your arse and work at some point? What about you abr?

we just need to catch the SK and this game is over. Lets just do it and not let this game drag on forever.

Aneninen · Post Post #4277 (ISO) » Mon May 04, 2015 9:31 pm

In post 4275, texcat wrote:
In post 4273, DeltaWave wrote:I'm conflicted. I didn't think the "We" was a scumtell but I think DS's explanation is BS. lol

Ugh. I've got to agree.

Actually that post was a kind of reaction test.
Scums tend to try to explain everything, no matter how idiotic the original reason is. Turning my weakness into my advantage is a thing I sometimes do. I thought, "noone would be surprised if I used a f-cking W as a scumtell, because everyone knows that I'm building up things out of nonsense things"... and still, Dragonspawn tried to explain that W...

As for my other reads. Yeah, my SK-profile might be utterly bad. But, it gave me ideas about how to read you all.
For example, I seriously doubt that Texcat is the SK. She was almost at the bottom of that list and she still said that my whole reasoning is pigeon poop. I don't think she'd do so if she were SK.

Egg · Post Post #4278 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 12:53 am

In post 4275, texcat wrote:
In post 4273, DeltaWave wrote:I'm conflicted. I didn't think the "We" was a scumtell but I think DS's explanation is BS. lol

Ugh. I've got to agree.

^yeah this. I do a shit ton of phone posting and if I've ever had capital letters in spots like that, it's usually because I added something in front of it whether it's online or in a text or whatever. Random capitalization doesn't really happen to me. I mean, it's not a stretch that he could be town and added that anyway, but that explanation doesn't feel truthful to me. And the tone of 4276 is very defeatest. No townie should be upset with an 8:1 gamestate. The SK, however, should be terrified that they have to survive four lynches.

dragonspawn · Post Post #4279 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 2:34 am

You guys can't be freakin serious. What exactly are guys going to do when I flip town? Lynch ap if he forgets a question mark?

Or maybe you guys will lynch ika despite him being dead already. If town loses this game I'm going to be seriously pissed at all of you.

With the thought process of the town, why would the sky be terrified that they need to survive four lynched? I've already been designated lynch number one apparently. Three more to survive and anen is doing a great job setting people up with nonsense.

I told you guys earlier, I don't lose if I die. You just have to win without me. If til manage to get lynchedntoday I think the odds are good the sk will be on the wagon. Look at that.

dragonspawn · Post Post #4280 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 2:56 am

If you guys do want to lynch me, ill live with it. But give me a chance for some final read lists you can use for tomorrow

A Royal Saint · Post Post #4281 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 6:18 am

In post 4273, DeltaWave wrote:I'm conflicted. I didn't think the "We" was a scumtell but I think DS's explanation is BS. lol

I definitely DON'T want to lynch Dragonspawn and this is evidence of fuel to the fire. Delta needs to go now.

VOTE: DeltaSpawn

A Royal Saint · Post Post #4282 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 6:22 am

VOTE: DeltaWave

DeltaWave · Post Post #4283 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 7:24 am

You were already voting me. Do you have any opinions at all outside of your tunnel?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #4284 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 9:53 am

Texcat?

Aneninen · Post Post #4285 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 11:32 am

In post 4284, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Texcat?

I don't think she's the one.
How about posting your case?

texcat · Post Post #4286 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 1:02 pm

No one wants to vote Klingon/Pisskop with me?

UNVOTE: Pisskop
VOTE: Delta

dragonspawn · Post Post #4287 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 5:58 pm

In post 4285, Aneninen wrote:
In post 4284, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Texcat?

I don't think she's the one.
How about posting your case?

Second the request for his case. Or just participating in general.

dragonspawn · Post Post #4288 (ISO) » Tue May 05, 2015 5:59 pm

In post 4286, texcat wrote:No one wants to vote Klingon/Pisskop with me?

UNVOTE: Pisskop
VOTE: Delta

I could but death is my top choice.

I don't like how pisskop and Abr are coasting this late in the game without any effort.

dragonspawn · Post Post #4289 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 4:54 am

AP why haven't you voted for anyone yet?

DeltaWave · Post Post #4290 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 5:02 am

In post 4286, texcat wrote:No one wants to vote Klingon/Pisskop with me?

UNVOTE: Pisskop
VOTE: Delta

It doesn't bother you that so much of your case is demonstrably wrong? I'm talking about the allegation that I was "coasting" on Day 2. Or do you just not care that you're misrepping?

Egg · Post Post #4291 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 5:40 am

I'm very interested in tex's answer to that because I thought she realized that the coasting thing was completely inaccurate yet she still voted you with that being the basis if her case last I knew. So unless there is more to it, it feels kind of off.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #4292 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 5:41 am

dragonspawn - 3 - pisskop, Egg, Aneninen
DeltaWave - 3 - dragonspawn, A Royal Saint, texcat

texcat - 2 - Albert B. Rampage, DeltaWave

Not Voting: AngryPidgeon

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2015-05-16 10:03:41)

V/LA:

Prodding AngryPidgeon and pisskop

pisskop · Post Post #4293 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 6:13 am

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #4294 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 6:14 am

I got prodded. Whoops. Let me read this.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #4295 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 6:36 am

In post 4273, DeltaWave wrote:I'm conflicted. I didn't think the "We" was a scumtell but I think DS's explanation is BS. lol

I don't really get how someone would think this. I mean come on. That's never happened to you?

In post 4277, Aneninen wrote:Scums tend to try to explain everything, no matter how idiotic the original reason is. Turning my weakness into my advantage is a thing I sometimes do. I thought, "noone would be surprised if I used a f-cking W as a scumtell, because everyone knows that I'm building up things out of nonsense things"... and still, Dragonspawn tried to explain that W...

Are you kidding me? This is the most blatant self-fulfilling prophecy ever. Of course there is a reason for the W being capitalized. People don't just randomly decide to capitalize words in the middle of sentences for no reason. You make a CASE on him for something that almost definitely has some stupid reason behind it and his giving the explanation is scummy because ?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?

If you think he is town, then what the hell do you expect him to say? "Ya I have no idea how that happened, I guess my finger slipped when I was typing but I didnd't notice at the time?"

Come on.

come on.

come On.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #4296 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 6:51 am

In post 4289, dragonspawn wrote:AP why haven't you voted for anyone yet?

I was wondering if someone was going to ask

. I'm at the point in the game where I want to be cautious. Hilarious lynches on lurkers are probablyn ot going to be effective at this point. I'm thinking. I was tempted to join Texcat's wagon on Pisskop. Delta wagon I'm hesitant on; I don't think Delta is going to be my preferred lynch Today. dragonspawn wagon is terribad and I can't believe its still a thing.

DeltaWave · Post Post #4297 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 6:54 am

I didn't say I was going to vote DS over the phone thing.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #4298 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 7:02 am

I know, I'm just stunned that people are jumping on him for this when IMO its a really null thing. Like really really null.

Egg · Post Post #4299 (ISO) » Wed May 06, 2015 7:33 am

In post 4296, AngryPidgeon wrote:
In post 4289, dragonspawn wrote:AP why haven't you voted for anyone yet?

I was wondering if someone was going to ask . I'm at the point in the game where I want to be cautious. Hilarious lynches on lurkers are probablyn ot going to be effective at this point. I'm thinking. I was tempted to join Texcat's wagon on Pisskop. Delta wagon I'm hesitant on; I don't think Delta is going to be my preferred lynch Today. dragonspawn wagon is terribad and I can't believe its still a thing.

Seems like a weird time to get cautious. I mean, I agree we can't be random lynching and shit but to be more cautious than you would normally in 8:1 feels weird.