In post 49, implosion wrote:I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it
Why wait?
RVS literally requires no reason and D1 requires only a weak one.
In post 49, implosion wrote:I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it
In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
VOTE: implosion
In post 53, Kublai Khan wrote:
His vote was deliberately not random.
In post 54, Shazam wrote:In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:1. Aren't you already voting him? 2. Got to get you a dictionary, cause he had like 3 votes and 3 isn't a bunchIn post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
VOTE: implosion
Agreed. I'm not going to vote him yet because he has a bunch of votes already, but FoS for sure.
In post 53, Kublai Khan wrote:
His vote was deliberately not random.
In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
VOTE: implosion
In post 59, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:Nvm, shazam change to bulba
In post 60, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
VOTE: implosion
I don't paticularly like this vote from Dragonspawn. It seems rather oppurtunistic with a wagon on Implosion starting.
In post 64, MarioManiac4 wrote:Yes, but 3 votes had already been placed on Implosion. I think he should have been trying to find another possible scum at that point.
In post 64, MarioManiac4 wrote:Yes, but 3 votes had already been placed on Implosion. I think he should have been trying to find another possible scum at that point.
In post 67, Shazam wrote:In post 64, MarioManiac4 wrote:Yes, but 3 votes had already been placed on Implosion. I think he should have been trying to find another possible scum at that point.
Scummiest thing yet. Not only are you wrong about how many votes were on implosion, but what townie would suggest that we need to find two scum before putting pressure on one? Definitely seeing a Mario/Implosion team as a possibility.
In post 64, MarioManiac4 wrote:Yes, but 3 votes had already been placed on Implosion. I think he should have been trying to find another possible scum at that point.
In post 69, MarioManiac4 wrote:If spawn was the 3rd vote, then I retract what I said
3 is not actually bad and we can keep this on Implosion.
And I was thinking that we already had 4 votes on Implosion. What's more, it is good to have pressure on more than one player, as otherwise if we're wrong we have nothing to fall on. And I don't like how you said that being wrong is scummy.
In post 70, Necessary Evil wrote:This idea that we need multiple suspects is awfully strange.
WoodyWoodpecker wrote:In post 70, Necessary Evil wrote:This idea that we need multiple suspects is awfully strange.
Hi, have you played mafia before?
In post 60, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
VOTE: implosion
I don't paticularly like this vote from Dragonspawn. It seems rather oppurtunistic with a wagon on Implosion starting.
In post 71, MarioManiac4 wrote:Is that RVS?
If not, then since when have we only had one suspect on D1?
We do not have to lynch every suspect.
In post 57, dragonspawn wrote:In post 53, Kublai Khan wrote:
His vote was deliberately not random.
And that makes him scum because...?