In post 358, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Cool, can I get your reasons for being suspicious of all those people?
I fookin' hate making long posts. Give me a bit to get it done.
In post 358, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Cool, can I get your reasons for being suspicious of all those people?
In post 360, Keyser Söze wrote:
In post 355, Klingoncelt wrote:I'm not liking much:
Aeronaut
Annadog40
Bellaphant
Boonskiies
dragonspawn
Keyser Söze
Kitty Galore
Kop
mykonian
Prolapsed Brain
SilverWrath
Sword Master
You may be onto something here Can you list the players you ARE liking much too, and finally a list of the players you are neither liking or not liking.
In post 361, mykonian wrote:In post 346, Bellaphant wrote:@myko, who is the one townie?
Thecow's page 13 is very townie. Not the individual posts, but the series.
Klingoncelts list is indeed not very productive, which he knows. The issue is that he starts from a gut read and tries to condense that. Or in his words, he's mostly paranoid. He finds the easy things to dislike, the people who lurk, the people who post awkwardly, the people who got fingers pointed their way. Which is exactly the thing an average scum would try to avoid. That list includes the bad scum, so you are probably going to find a couple there, depending on what the mod randomly sent out. I'd be a bit sad though if klingon actually used that as his starting point, he's discarding the average scum to muck around in a hard to read pool of players. It's something to keep in mind, not a reads list.
In post 380, davesaz wrote:
@Klingon: A better question would be, what about Shazam's play makes you think the noob/alt question needs to be asked?
In post 398, TheCow wrote:Busy with RL at the moment. I'll do an reread the thread and do an analysis on something I find interesting when I get the chance. For now, I'd be open to people asking me questions on specific matters which do not involve rereading the entire thread: I should have time enough for at least that.
In post 329, Shazam wrote:In post 307, Bellaphant wrote:I likewhat FA is doing.
@BBT, I can kinda see what Gamr is saying about dragon -I feel likehe's not looking any deeper at the game and it'sfrustrating to me.
In terms of Soze, his Isoconfusesme. Some of itseemsreally genuine and town-minded, some of it is just...noisy and the discussion with mykdoesn't fill me with town-vibesIt might be a style thing.
PB's iso is not giving me anypositive feelings, though. He's not sharing information, and with 12 postsI feelI should know -something- about his read on the game, and I don't.
VOTE: PB
This is poor. If you expect anyone to agree with you about who to vote, talk about more than your feelings. If you don't expect anyone to agree with you, why are you doing it?
In post 331, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 308, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Can you explain this? Hoping for something substantial from your slot soon...
Earlier on, when the Dragon flashwagon was rocketing ahead, I was certain that you were Scum. Now I see how you were using it for information. So now you look Townish.
In post 341, mykonian wrote:this game has too many dragon votes and too few on soze/duppin
In post 348, Garmr wrote:Do you have some sort of sick and twisted post restrictions rc
In post 346, Bellaphant wrote:@myko, who is the one townie?
@Shazam, why are you attacking what is basically a play-style thing? It doesn't look like you've bothered to work out if it's anything to do with alignment, and it's no different to a bunch of people's reads. Why chose to take apart that post, in 14 pages?
In post 353, Klingoncelt wrote:
I've come across some very cocky noobs of late. They don't help move the game along at all. They hinder it.
Now if he's an old player using an alt, that makes a difference.
In post 355, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 354, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Kling, can you state your reads please?
Right now paranoia's taken over. I'm not liking much:
Aeronaut
Annadog40
Bellaphant
Boonskiies
dragonspawn
Keyser Söze
Kitty Galore
Kop
mykonian
Prolapsed Brain
SilverWrath
Sword Master
Yeah, more than half the players.
In post 368, Garmr wrote:I feel quite comfortable now just sitting here thinking and taking note of reads to myself. large games are like that through I can always sit back and analysis things at my own pace.
In post 371, Keyser Söze wrote:My comments in.red
In post 365, mykonian wrote:You had trouble to get going this game.. You didn't want to miss the boat and get called out as a lurker so early on you wanted good looking posts out to get off to a good start(That is your opinion, I have been enjoying this game from the very beginning [not aligment-indicative]). There are two keys to this, first "good looking" and the second that it was forced by your gameplan, not naturally by other people's posting. So what we end up with are very early posts with lots of quotes and a stiff structure. So by page 5 we see a PBPA(I have never been called a lurker, and I don't think I ever will be called a lurker. I would rather replace out then lurk [not aligment-indicative]). That's straight up silly should you have been town. As scum however, it makes a lot of sense. The PBPA structure makes that getting a post out with seeming analysis is doable, it helps you post. And really, you'll always find something if you want to in those. PBPA's are fine. But not on page 5. On the same page we find a logical setup about a quote where the premise is very neatly detailed etc. The argumentation is similar. Sure you could do that as town, but more usually a town sees a post, quotes it, and points out what he's seeing. He doesn't need a setup at the time of what is the exit of the RVS(Do you think only a scum-aligned player is more likely to post in my style? [not aligment-indicative]).(Again you are saying my playstyle is less likely to be written by a town-aligned player [not aligment-indicative])
Later on you get into your groove more, as expected. The start of the game is awkward for scum, you don't know where everybody stands and first impressions do count. But once that's past, you know what people want and who they suspect, responding to them and asking questions about it gets much easier, and as such scum posting would be expected to feel more natural. It's easy to blend in when people already have an expectancy from you(I was not trying to blend in, I am developing and challenging my reads continually [not aligment-indicative]).
Shame your early game gives you away
Suggestion: Re-read my posts.
Think: 'Is it possible for them to be posted from a town-aligned player?'
Conclusion: All your reasons I cannot challenge with logic, as it is the same reply for all of them: 'Why can't a town-aligned player have posted this?' There are no allegations to respond to, no miss-reads/miss-reps to support, no contradictions to address: only comments regarding my playstyle.
- I will frame this Shame your myopic game let's your scum-hunting ability down.
"Shame your early game gives you away"
In post 381, Annadog40 wrote:In post 370, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:May I ask why?
I don't see why their not explaining their voting reasons is scummier then all the other players who do the exact same thing
In post 382, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It's not just the not explaining his vote.
He went against the Dragon wagon and then joined the wagon. He never explained his reasoning for joining the wagon; when questioning about joining the wagon he unvotes.
Other than this, he has done nothing noteworthy in the game.
That is more than enough reason to vote someone.
In post 390, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:He is clearly paying attention to the thread.
Don't let his lack of posting fool you.
In post 398, TheCow wrote:Busy with RL at the moment. I'll do an reread the thread and do an analysis on something I find interesting when I get the chance. For now, I'd be open to people asking me questions on specific matters which do not involve rereading the entire thread: I should have time enough for at least that.
In post 420, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:That is more than 'pretty weak reasoning'.
Having said that; maybe if you join the PB wagon and we push him you will be able to develop a read?
In post 404, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 361, mykonian wrote:In post 346, Bellaphant wrote:@myko, who is the one townie?
Thecow's page 13 is very townie. Not the individual posts, but the series.
Klingoncelts list is indeed not very productive, which he knows. The issue is that he starts from a gut read and tries to condense that. Or in his words, he's mostly paranoid. He finds the easy things to dislike, the people who lurk, the people who post awkwardly, the people who got fingers pointed their way. Which is exactly the thing an average scum would try to avoid. That list includes the bad scum, so you are probably going to find a couple there, depending on what the mod randomly sent out. I'd be a bit sad though if klingon actually used that as his starting point, he's discarding the average scum to muck around in a hard to read pool of players. It's something to keep in mind, not a reads list.
SHE isn't as noob as you think, dear.
I know some of the players and how they think.