In post 4996, Spiffeh wrote:^ That doesn't sound very fair if he's not even the person she thinks he is
yeah well someone has a phobia and the only way to stop this is to take the person away or take the phobia-causing thing away.
tammy came first
this is a weird situation. one way that is fair for everyone is for tammy to not post and let nacho do everything until warped leaves the game via death. that could work too
I don't think it's ridiculous to ask you to develop more reads than a wall about Xtoxm being null and then VoidedMafia could be scum because ???, Spiffeh scum because of how he's treating me/Xtoxm.
The excuse that "no one else is doing anything" is garbage; there are 200 pages of shit that you've read; there's no way in hell that the only in-depth reads you could form were us-scum and Xtoxm-null.
But you're right that it feels like we've been killing scum just often enough which feels like the most boring way to kill scum.
Don't think it helps that the one scum we killed was a cop guilty and the other two were killed
Still scum I think but I'm currently cuddled up with NakedJogger's/Loran/DGB's ISO who I'm almost certainly going to townread which will make gorkington mad.
I really hope all of my scum reads are on the bottom of the page.
In post 1765, Loranthaceae wrote:I just gave up on reading the game and am handing out random townreads so people don't lynch me.
I think players, as a whole, are more likely to say shit like this when they're town, especially Loran, who, if I remember correctly, enjoys playing scum and is competent at it.
In post 1853, FakedBlogger wrote:I think Flubber (meta) might be town for real and farside (falsely portrayed me as the instigator of fights - too ballsy for scum), and maybe the Profgessor (for not giving a shit about my question and energy, scum would've been more cautious not to drop the interaction ball). While ZZZX, Oversoul, and why not pisskop would be my picks for scum, but I just ISOed around some so take it with a grain of salt, and I don't plan on doing much in terms of scumhunting. Just watching like BBmolla, posting once every 40 sounds good to me; lynch me if it doesn't to you. That's all I got.
Reads aren't bad at all.
In post 4161, DrippingGoofball wrote:I was trying to avoid confirming this was some amnesiac's result because, as a replacement player that has not read the game, I was hoping to draw the nightkill.
I didn't even notice this part before; I think the way that DGB handled the situation was super duper town. I think that if she did receive the result as scum she would immediately claim it and start pushing it; if she was worried about getting lynched if the result was wrong she could push for the watcher to out but she didn't do that. The rationale for drawing a nightkill makes complete sense and I think it's also why scum would out immediately that it was amnesiac.
In post 5016, Spiffeh wrote:So if you are reading Voided as scum why are you so quick to dismiss your possible guilty?
My posting at first was "hey I just know this investigation isn't sane let's not lynch because it's not reliable", but sure, it could be. If he flips scum and I get another investigation off, maybe I'll have a little more faith.
If you are scum, you are scum with Titus. I thought you had a good interaction with Titus. I thought you had a bad interaction with Titus. My overall read on you is town.
I was still bothered by your interactions with Titus, as I talked about in the post. I still don't mind people looking over your work.
Where is my play unreasonable? Should I just blindly accept my townread on you? Is that what townies do?
No, but I've never seen town either head you so badly misuse a quote and use that as a reason to cast aspersions on someone either.
