I never really claim that type of meta awareness on anyone - you can ask Nacho, I always act like meta reading is a deep and fascinating mystery.
In post 947, Concrete Angels wrote:I feel like you pulling a null on me rather than just calling me scum is icky and fence-sitty and inappropriate.
So you're saying I do that as scum?
In post 947, Concrete Angels wrote:I've been transparent enough that you should be able to form an opinion of my motivations one way or the other. It's not like I've been cryptic or absent.
I will agree you have been present.
I have - remember that whole case thing?
Remember how I'm "demeaning it" and attacking you subtly and trying to downplay you to Nacho?
You blew up at me over that, now you're acting like I haven't been clear with a stated issue about why I find your play Smurfy?
Serious?
If the quotes from before the question are the answer - is your answer best described as "paranoia"?
Because you don't seem to be saying anything.
You also seem to be hedging me into a null read while complaining that I'm putting you in a null read - what are your thoughts on that?
Oh, darn, gosh, I'm sorry, i meant to list you as town, what with all the strong town vibes I've expressed about you in this thread, and not calling you scum but then unvoting you due to a claim.
Yes - you are null.