Mini 1717 Alfred Hitchcock UPick [GAME OVER]


User avatar
pistachi0n
pistachi0n
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
pistachi0n
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1494
Joined: March 28, 2015

Post Post #1350 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 9:30 am

Post by pistachi0n »

Cataphant voted farside in RVS. Their next post was a real vote on Hecatia in for "weirdly aggressive questioning." Changed to Vedith in because I look like second option scum that gets passed over. Then voted LC in because of the weird claim he did. Then went back to me, and then back to LC. Which seemed like an unsure town player trying to figure out alignments. I can see why people are voting Cat because of sheeping and weak pushes, but I think Nacho is still a better target.
User avatar
farside22
farside22
Mafia Mum
User avatar
User avatar
farside22
Mafia Mum
Mafia Mum
Posts: 35785
Joined: October 24, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

Post Post #1351 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:29 am

Post by farside22 »

holy crap where did that come from.

vote: Nacho
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1352 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 1:58 pm

Post by Ankamius »

In post 1303, farside22 wrote:
In post 1299, Ankamius wrote:Okay, step one: can someone quote for me their points on Pistachi0n?



Besides not really scum hunting. Asking pointless questions and just actively lurking.

No I'm thinking that's all I got.

:roll:


thx~
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1353 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:00 pm

Post by Ankamius »

In post 1156, Davsto wrote:VOTE: pistachio

Will look through Wingback's ISO tomorrow and see if maybe he caught onto something which resulted in his death. He was doing a lot but I reckon there's a good chance there are other motives behind his death.


...what?
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1354 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:02 pm

Post by Ankamius »

In post 1177, farside22 wrote:
In post 1176, Vedith wrote:So out of my scum reads of Cataphant, Pistachio and Ank two are voting for the others.

Yeah I can see a bussing technique going on here.



Why anka?

In post 1179, Vedith wrote:Because of his day 1. I still don't like the way he just tried to buddy around and agree any where. Most people seem to have ignored that part though.


You're tunneling.

Reassess.
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1355 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:04 pm

Post by Ankamius »

:facepalm:

Scratch 1354.
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1356 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:12 pm

Post by Ankamius »

In post 1262, Davsto wrote:
In post 1256, Nachomamma8 wrote:DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS SUCKS

Nice

VOTE: Nachomamma8

Now say something
useful
, because I'm not just gonna let you get away with fluff.


look at this guy
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1357 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:15 pm

Post by Ankamius »

In post 1265, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1255, Cataphant wrote:He's been a strong voice so had enough power to remain mostly unscathed, but upon reflection (especially with wingback flipping town) shows that a lot of what he was saying was BS.

How does Wingback flipping town make what I say look more like BS than it already did or didn't?
That doesn't appear to make any sense at all.


Why did you object to that instead of him thinking what you're saying is BS in general?
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1358 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:18 pm

Post by Ankamius »

In post 1291, Concrete Angels wrote:it's already obvious there is bussing going on here somewhere. if pist is scum so is cat.


What about the gamestate is giving you this impression?
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1359 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:22 pm

Post by Ankamius »

In post 1311, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:People who are townreading Nacho: why?


Can you quote your points on Nacho being scum?
Ankamius
Ankamius
Survivor
Ankamius
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21802
Joined: May 9, 2011
Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.

Post Post #1360 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:25 pm

Post by Ankamius »

VOTE: Davsto
User avatar
Vedith
Vedith
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Vedith
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21212
Joined: June 18, 2015
Location: Surrey

Post Post #1361 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:12 pm

Post by Vedith »

In post 1360, Ankamius wrote:VOTE: Davsto


Ummm, you know that he claimed JK, right?
Or are you voting him just because he's voting you?
I claim scum \o/
User avatar
Davsto
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
User avatar
User avatar
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
Farce of Habit
Posts: 5279
Joined: June 29, 2015
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #1362 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:24 pm

Post by Davsto »

In post 1361, Vedith wrote:
In post 1360, Ankamius wrote:VOTE: Davsto


Ummm, you know that he claimed JK, right?
Or are you voting him just because he's voting you?

I'm not even voting him.

But this move is townie. I don't feel scum would have the balls to vote someone that most of the town considers confirmed.
User avatar
Vedith
Vedith
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Vedith
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 21212
Joined: June 18, 2015
Location: Surrey

Post Post #1363 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:54 pm

Post by Vedith »

Okay, so lets hear his case he has on you...

I don't see someone trying to stir the pot as towny personally, but as you wish.
I claim scum \o/
User avatar
massive
massive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
massive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4918
Joined: July 16, 2003
Location: The Springs, CO

Post Post #1364 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:24 am

Post by massive »

At this rate, I'm more likely to follow Ank than I am Davsto.
"1AM .. not a good time to think I started mixing massive and mathcam" - Totem, DP8
"unvote mlaker; vote massive; It's like MeMe/mneme and Corsato/Cadmium" - Dragon Phoenix, Newbie 38
PLEASE NOTE: I actively avoid being online on weekends! Don't replace me just because of this!
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1365 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:35 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1351, farside22 wrote:holy crap where did that come from.

So basically Pistach posts up a few half finished and vague thoughts and suddenly is towny enough not only to unvote, but to half sheep?
:neutral:

In post 1357, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1265, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1255, Cataphant wrote:He's been a strong voice so had enough power to remain mostly unscathed, but upon reflection (especially with wingback flipping town) shows that a lot of what he was saying was BS.

How does Wingback flipping town make what I say look more like BS than it already did or didn't?
That doesn't appear to make any sense at all.


Why did you object to that instead of him thinking what you're saying is BS in general?

This is an incredibly empty question that appears to be for the sake of asking questions.

I asked about the one, because him thinking my opinions are BS is a debate of opinion, and serves no purpose.
Him thinking that somehow Wingback flipping town says something about my alignment is a conclusion which (theoretically) he ought to be able to back up to prove he is scumhunting as opposed to just spouting gak.
I asked about the point that would actually allow me to scumhunt him, as opposed to debating the merits of my towniness and trying to make him look stupid.
Felt this was pretty obvious really.

I am curious to see where this goes, as my expectation is 'nowhere at all'.
Prove me wrong, please.
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1366 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:36 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1365, Thor665 wrote:So basically Pistach posts up a few half finished and vague thoughts and suddenly is towny enough not only to unvote, but to half sheep?

I mean, if I thought Pisyach was active lurking and not providing valid scumhunting - there is nothing in those few posts to even come close to changing my mind.
And if it did - why the hell can I not get you to discuss Cataphant as a valid vote?
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
User avatar
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
Devil in the Details
Posts: 38382
Joined: June 5, 2009
Location: Chicago

Post Post #1367 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:12 pm

Post by Nachomamma8 »

In post 1237, pistachi0n wrote:VOTE: Nachomomma

I looked through the iso, think he had the most suspect reason for voting Lying Cat. He responded to a few of Lying Cat's statements but never directly stated why he was scummy. and he stopped talking after placing the LC vote.

I thought that a Lying Cat vote was good because I agreed with the assertion that he hadn't done much but scumhunt Thor in a way that didn't make much sense and I agreed that scum!Jingle would think that tying himself up with Thor would be a good strategy to skate past a couple of days. I've skimmed your case in the small bit of reading that I have managed to do, but i your reason for finding me scum really "he didn't explain one of his votes"? You notice that I don't tend to explain my votes immediately on making them and you've been fine with all of the explanations thus far, so why is me not getting the chance to explain one of my votes scummy?

In post 1255, Cataphant wrote:I recommend you all look at the very end of the day yesterday, and while my recollection was that everyone was debating between pistachio and lying cat, thor was basically only going one side of that story with NO explanation. I think he did the IC thing where he put his ass on the line a bit to keep his buddy safe. He used the fear of deadline to push people into going onto Lying cat. He's been a strong voice so had enough power to remain mostly unscathed, but upon reflection (especially with wingback flipping town) shows that a lot of what he was saying was BS.

I think pistachio has to go today.

I don't find this explanation to be at all accurate, but maybe my memory isn't what it used to be.

In post 1262, Davsto wrote:
In post 1256, Nachomamma8 wrote:DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS SUCKS

Nice

VOTE: Nachomamma8

Now say something
useful
, because I'm not just gonna let you get away with fluff.

...what?
I made that post because I didn't have time to read and catch up on the thread.
Do you really think that a player making one fluff post is worthy of a vote?
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten

-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
User avatar
Davsto
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
User avatar
User avatar
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
Farce of Habit
Posts: 5279
Joined: June 29, 2015
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #1368 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:18 pm

Post by Davsto »

In post 1367, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 1262, Davsto wrote:
In post 1256, Nachomamma8 wrote:DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS SUCKS

Nice

VOTE: Nachomamma8

Now say something
useful
, because I'm not just gonna let you get away with fluff.

...what?
I made that post because I didn't have time to read and catch up on the thread.
Do you really think that a player making one fluff post is worthy of a vote?

It was more an expression of frustration than a proper vote.
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
User avatar
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
Devil in the Details
Posts: 38382
Joined: June 5, 2009
Location: Chicago

Post Post #1369 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:26 pm

Post by Nachomamma8 »

In post 1266, Cataphant wrote:^ posts like this? Using fear tactics to get them lynched. Other folks had reasonable stances like "we'll get them if they can't confirm themselves", and you went gung ho the whole time. Saying you "confirmed" they can't prove it.

A town player would see this and react to give them a chance. A scum player who's buddy is the alternative would go gung ho for the original one. Good play in the moment, but it got you caught.

His argument was that LC actually wouldn't be able to confirm himself, which is correct. He said that he really didn't understand the Pishtachi0n and that he would still support LC instead. How is that using "fear tactics"? Also saying that town gives LC a chance to prove himself there 100% is just blatantly false, there's no reason that Thor had to believe LC saying he could confirm himself (it's not like he had claimed a definite way to confirm alignment and being able to confirm role in't the most compelling thing in the world).

In post 1292, farside22 wrote:
In post 1291, Concrete Angels wrote:it's already obvious there is bussing going on here somewhere. if pist is scum so is cat.



Nacho is being really quiet about this and that is where I'm still leaning on as far as bussing goes.

I'm being quiet because I haven't been around - it's not like you haven't seen me lurk as town before.

In post 1304, Thor665 wrote:What's not to understand?
He was the most popular of the choices you offered - so clearly there was support there.
You sat around reading up.
A push started on LC, who probably had more support than Cat.
You leaped onto the LC wagon without ever really pushing the Cat one.

Why does that confuse you to the gamestate today?

I misjudged the momentum while I was reading.

In post 1330, Vedith wrote:Nacho - I assume that you were aware?

That I was jailed? No.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten

-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
User avatar
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
Devil in the Details
Posts: 38382
Joined: June 5, 2009
Location: Chicago

Post Post #1370 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:26 pm

Post by Nachomamma8 »

In post 1368, Davsto wrote:It was more an expression of frustration than a proper vote.

You haven't really made the steps to make a proper vote yet.
Why?
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten

-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
User avatar
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
Devil in the Details
Posts: 38382
Joined: June 5, 2009
Location: Chicago

Post Post #1371 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:29 pm

Post by Nachomamma8 »

In post 1220, massive wrote:So why the defensive posturing here? If you have CA as a null, why immediately jump to accuse them of discrediting you?

How should townies respond to being discredited by a townread?

In post 1293, massive wrote:This is a different answer than "rarely." "Rarely" says "I never have an idea what Nacho is, town or scum." This says "I usually have an idea what Nacho is, but then I turn out to be wrong." This doesn't say "it's all null with him," which is what your earlier post said.

Why is this difference significant?

I don't like your recent posting because it feel like you're nitpicking pretty hard - what do you think of Cataphant? What do you think of Vedith?
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten

-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
User avatar
Davsto
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
User avatar
User avatar
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
Farce of Habit
Posts: 5279
Joined: June 29, 2015
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #1372 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:33 pm

Post by Davsto »

In post 1370, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 1368, Davsto wrote:It was more an expression of frustration than a proper vote.

You haven't really made the steps to make a proper vote yet.
Why?

In post 1327, Davsto wrote:VOTE: pistachi0n hmm

look at this proper vote I haven't made
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
User avatar
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
Devil in the Details
Posts: 38382
Joined: June 5, 2009
Location: Chicago

Post Post #1373 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:35 pm

Post by Nachomamma8 »

Vote: Cataphant


I still want to vote here today. I don't like the "Thor was pushing fear tactics to get an LC wagon through" argument as a reason for voting Pistach today. I don't like how he made the argument that Wingback flipping town made Thor's arguments look more like bullshit and then didn't explain himself when Thor asked, And part of me was a little unsteady in making this vote because I remembered him making a push I sincerely disliked in Butterfly Mafia but I got events mixed up - he flipped scum, it wasn't the person he was pushing.

I still want to lynch massive despite the pseudo-innocent on him. I haven't like his angles lately and all and have trouble imagining those angles from town actually trying to find scum.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten

-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
User avatar
User avatar
Nachomamma8
Devil in the Details
Devil in the Details
Posts: 38382
Joined: June 5, 2009
Location: Chicago

Post Post #1374 (ISO) » Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:35 pm

Post by Nachomamma8 »

Vote: Cataphant


I still want to vote here today. I don't like the "Thor was pushing fear tactics to get an LC wagon through" argument as a reason for voting Pistach today. I don't like how he made the argument that Wingback flipping town made Thor's arguments look more like bullshit and then didn't explain himself when Thor asked, And part of me was a little unsteady in making this vote because I remembered him making a push I sincerely disliked in Butterfly Mafia but I got events mixed up - he flipped scum, it wasn't the person he was pushing.

I still want to lynch massive despite the pseudo-innocent on him. I haven't like his angles lately and all and have trouble imagining those angles from town actually trying to find scum.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten

-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”