In post 949, Tails wrote:Look:
Xtoxm is survivor. Not scum.
Nana is a mechanic.
I'm conf. town.
You, Alive, Ika, Smiffle, and Firebringer are super duper town.
Lion and Davsto are town, too, but less so.
That leaves Wanderer, Asp, and Genda. Genda will be confirmed one way or the other. That just leaves Wanderer and Asp, and Wanderer has scummy content.
I might have bought that if it wasn't for you saying you are confirmed Town.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
I'm conflicted on Xtom. On one-hand, I think leaving him alive for a later default-lynch is a fine option, but on the other hand I approve of lynching him right now to just remove the potential obstacle entirely. I'm also up for a scum lynch instead of a third party lynch. Leaving Xt alone for now is fine with me only if I think we have a good shot of hitting scum with our lynch. Instead of defaulting to him now, default to him later. The results from that lynch will probably be more telling than everyone ganging up on him today due to the field of players being narrowed.
He's claimed survivor. Quite simply, we'll have to lynch him sometime.
It doesn't matter when we lynch Xtoxm, we'll always have the same info, and that is he is survivor.
If we lynch Xtoxm, say, tomorrow, we have less info for today's lynch, reducing the chances of it hitting scum.
If we lynch Xtoxm today, we'll have more info for our first time we attempt to lynch scum.
the longer we wait to lynch him the more problematic it gets for us. Right now we have no confirmed Scum... that should really be the only thing keeping us from lynching Xt. We already have one player we have to wait and see on which is Genda. I would really rather keep that kind of thing to a minimum if you get what I'm saying. When we start to get like 3 players that we are waiting on "finding out" stuff it gets really problematic real fast.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 957, smiffle wrote:Tails, why are all of your scumreads people who have lurked or been generally quiet in comparison to the rest of the thread?
Did you even read my post? I was quite clear on where my head's at.
But what will we have learned from Xt's lynch if we lynch him today?
Could the town use his vote to help with lynchs?
His lynch does seem like an easy one for scum to default to, but it'll probably always be that way as long as he's in the game...
I still want some time to think about this, but I see Dav and Licks' points.
In post 964, smiffle wrote:But what will we have learned from Xt's lynch if we lynch him today?
Could the town use his vote to help with lynchs?
His lynch does seem like an easy one for scum to default to, but it'll probably always be that way as long as he's in the game...
I still want some time to think about this, but I see Dav and Licks' points.
I have an ability that triggers when I hammer.... so if anything we get that out of lynching Xt. If we lynch someone else, there's really no telling who it would be at this point. with so much up in the air, it only makes sense to go for the much safer option of lynching a known neutral. AND there will likely be a tone of info given during the night so there is that too.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Let me spell this out for you, because no one seems to get it. We have 13 player slots. 2 of them are of no consequence. 1 of those 2 wins as long as they're alive. If you're town and counting on a Lylo situation, you're playing wrong. If the goal is to lynch scum, lynching the survivor is only slightly more optimal than a no lynch and should be avoided unless there is no other option. Most people tend to root for town. The best option is to allow the survivor a chance to share the win and leave them to the vig to decide if further action is necessary. I'm willing to gamble on lynching scum before a kingmaker situation comes into play. Out of the 11 left, I can tell you that 5 have made their town alignment extremely apparent. That leaves 6, of which I have a strong townread on 1 of them, weaker townreads on 2, a scumread on 1, and nothing much on the last 2. Of the last 2, I plan on sorting the miller claim fully within the next couple of days. If you just want to go strictly on the odds, and not on just my reads, we have 6 slots to find scum in. This isn't that hard.
In post 795, Xtoxm wrote:i am a neutral survivor. ive approached the game in a town way and have every intention of continuing to do so.
lynch me if you want
/shrug
my ability is real and still means something, presumably.
bastard game yeah but. making someone a survivor and then telling someone else they are not town. what is the point. at least give me a safeclaim if ur gonna do that shit
This AtE really makes me want to lynch you. Also because we're already at 30+ pages I really don't feel like looking for *actual scum* over a claimed survivor who is a PL anyway.
I find this post funny only because she's commenting on apathy with apathy of her own. Also, she hasn't done much scum hunting aside from shooting some questions at both Lickety and GL earlier toDay, and maybe some kind of interactions with Xt earlier.
Overall, her Iso was dotted with some instances of scumhunting, but they never really went anywhere as far as a vote. She recently latched onto the Xt claim apparently due to it being a PL, and that's been their first vote the entire game. There isn't much of anything in her Iso, other than her claiming she's stoned, so I'm perfectly fine with this lynch.