Blitz 5: Netherspite's Blitz SORM Mafia [Game Over]

Aronis · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:33 pm

In post 248, hi im Yakko wrote:
In post 237, Professor Bozo wrote:ok so ranger is scum number 2 good to know.

My gut says ranger is town.

That's a really helpful explanation, thanks.

Kraeg · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:33 pm

Alright.

I'm Town Protective

Firebringer · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:34 pm

Alright.
I am thinking we lynch anyone claiming a Town Protective.
I recommend me first.

Zymf · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:35 pm

This means all town/neutral roles have been claimed, yay

- If the rest of the players want to claim, they have to counterclaim some players ^^

Players who haven't claimed yet:

Hippy Love, Idiot Savant, Ranger, Dwlee99, Kraeg

VOTE: Kraeg (He doubted Fire's approach and used that as an excuse for not claiming)

Okay never mind.. hmm

Aronis · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:36 pm

In post 252, Firebringer wrote:Alright.
I am thinking we lynch anyone claiming a Town Protective.
I recommend me first.

Srsly? Are you a jester? Bc otherwise wtf are you doing?

Firebringer · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:36 pm

Idiot Savant is also claiming protective.

Three Protective Claims:
Me, Kraeg and Idiot Savant.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:37 pm

In post 250, Aronis wrote:
In post 248, hi im Yakko wrote:
In post 237, Professor Bozo wrote:ok so ranger is scum number 2 good to know.

My gut says ranger is town.

That's a really helpful explanation, thanks.

How to explain a gut read. Hmmmm I doubt mafia would say that blatant a lie i.e. Hippy claiming x when they clearly haven't claimed anything.

Firebringer · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:37 pm

In post 254, Aronis wrote:
Srsly? Are you a jester? Bc otherwise wtf are you doing?

No, but people seem hell driven on my lynch for god knows reasons. I think if we eliminate all the people claiming one slot, we got a good chance of sorting everyone else out.

I doubt every person claiming Protective is a protective.

Professor Bozo · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:37 pm

WILL PEOPLE STOP TRYING TO FUCKING LYNCH MOLLIE?

Firebringer · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:38 pm

In post 258, Professor Bozo wrote:WILL PEOPLE STOP TRYING TO FUCKING LYNCH MOLLIE?

No, if she doesn't claim. She is eating rope.

Kraeg · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:38 pm

In post 249, Aronis wrote:
In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.

I would not be opposed to this. If we have a better scumread I say go for that instead, but other than the possibility of them being a Jester, lynching them won't harm us and we have no shortage of lynches today.

I definitely agree with this. One of the neutral should be lynched. I know that they won't harm us right now, but later in the game they will because of course they don't care who gets lynched. The scum will most likely not kill them. It would be harder in the later part of the game to lynch a scum because there are some players who simply don't care at all.

Firebringer · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:38 pm

You have zero reason to fight for her not getting lynched.
She isn't cooperating with town, and seriously you are pissing me off Ika.

Firebringer · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:39 pm

In post 260, Kraeg wrote:
In post 249, Aronis wrote:
In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.

I would not be opposed to this. If we have a better scumread I say go for that instead, but other than the possibility of them being a Jester, lynching them won't harm us and we have no shortage of lynches today.

I definitely agree with this. One of the neutral should be lynched. I know that they won't harm us right now, but later in the game they will because of course they don't care who gets lynched. The scum will most likely not kill them. It would be harder in the later part of the game to lynch a scum because there are some players who simply don't care at all.

Shut up, we aren't lynching a neutral, its a waste of a lynch.

Professor Bozo · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:40 pm

In post 259, Firebringer wrote:
In post 258, Professor Bozo wrote:WILL PEOPLE STOP TRYING TO FUCKING LYNCH MOLLIE?

No, if she doesn't claim. She is eating rope.

In post 261, Firebringer wrote:You have zero reason to fight for her not getting lynched.
She isn't cooperating with town, and seriously you are pissing me off Ika.

I HAVE EVERY FUCKING REASON TO FIGHT HER FUCKING LYNCH. YOU DO NOT EVEN CROSS ME WHEN IT COMES TO MOLLIE. I DONT GIVE A FLYING FUCK IF IT PISSES YOU THE FUCK OFF. MOLLIE IS NOT BEING LYNCHED

Professor Bozo · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:41 pm

fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.

i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now

Firebringer · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:42 pm

Shut up Ika, you are asking us to not lynch Mollie over no reason what so ever.
Their is 0 case except that you like mollie.

do you seriously not think she shouldn't claim?

Like what is your logic here, she can be the only one not claim? Cause.....that will help town.

Zymf · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:42 pm

In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.

But if Frogger were anti-town, why would he claim neutral to begin with? The fact that he had the gut to claim neutral makes me trust him a bit. The same does not apply to Yreckt though, as he claimed last.

@Idiot Savant: Don't drag previous games into this one please

Firebringer · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:43 pm

In post 264, Professor Bozo wrote:fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.

i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now

WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH THIS GAME WE ARE IN!!!!

LISTEN TO YOURSELF FOR A MINUTE PLEASE!!!

Kraeg · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:45 pm

In post 253, Zymf wrote:This means all town/neutral roles have been claimed, yay - If the rest of the players want to claim, they have to counterclaim some players ^^

Players who haven't claimed yet:
Hippy Love, Idiot Savant, Ranger, Dwlee99, Kraeg

VOTE: Kraeg (He doubted Fire's approach and used that as an excuse for not claiming)

Okay never mind.. hmm

I never used it as an excuse for not claiming. I NEVER even mentioned any excuse to not claim. I just simply doubted that he's telling the truth. Don't put words in my mouth.

Firebringer · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:46 pm

Why would I be the one lying?
I was the first person to claim lol.

Yreckt · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:46 pm

In post 269, Firebringer wrote:Why would I be the one lying?
I was the first person to claim lol.

Saving this post for later.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:46 pm

Also I think kraegs(?) reason for voting fire pmakes sense prima facie. But playing it out doesn't. Did that make sense? Sorry sorry. What I mean is. I don't think it was relevant that fire claimed a protective role and declared a game breaking strat. No matter how you look at it a game breaking strat by mass claim has a decent chance of working out in this instance; ergo hiding the protective claim goes to number 2 on the priority list and winning is of course number 1.

If a game break strategy that invoved claiming was brought up by someone else all protective roles would still have to claim eventually. The fact that a protective role brought it up should be immaterial.

UNVOTE:

Firebringer · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:47 pm

Ummm why?

Firebringer · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:47 pm

In post 270, Yreckt wrote:
In post 269, Firebringer wrote:Why would I be the one lying?
I was the first person to claim lol.

Saving this post for later.

Ummm why?

Professor Bozo · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:47 pm

In post 265, Firebringer wrote:Shut up Ika, you are asking us to not lynch Mollie over no reason what so ever.
Their is 0 case except that you like mollie.

do you seriously not think she shouldn't claim?

Like what is your logic here, she can be the only one not claim? Cause.....that will help town.

Your putting words in my mouth fire. i do agree she should calim but if we are lynchign her i do not want her being the first fucking lynch of the fucking game. I like her cus she helps me with my depression and motivates me to play my games regarless of her alignment. if we lycnh her before i get a full say and work with her to decide i will be pissed off beond words

In post 266, Zymf wrote:

@Idiot Savant: Don't drag previous games into this one please

im not, im bring out a player who i know is not only one of the best players in this game right now, but someoen who i know and like to work with cus they understand me for me

In post 267, Firebringer wrote:
In post 264, Professor Bozo wrote:fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.

i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now

WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH THIS GAME WE ARE IN!!!!

LISTEN TO YOURSELF FOR A MINUTE PLEASE!!!

EVERYTHING, I AM LISTENITNG TO MYSELF FIRE. I DO NOT WANT HER LYCNHED UNTILL I WORK WITH HER.