In post 248, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 237, Professor Bozo wrote:ok so ranger is scum number 2 good to know.
My gut says ranger is town.
That's a really helpful explanation, thanks.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
In post 248, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 237, Professor Bozo wrote:ok so ranger is scum number 2 good to know.
My gut says ranger is town.
In post 252, Firebringer wrote:Alright.
I am thinking we lynch anyone claiming a Town Protective.
I recommend me first.
In post 250, Aronis wrote:In post 248, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 237, Professor Bozo wrote:ok so ranger is scum number 2 good to know.
My gut says ranger is town.
That's a really helpful explanation, thanks.
In post 258, Professor Bozo wrote:WILL PEOPLE STOP TRYING TO FUCKING LYNCH MOLLIE?
In post 249, Aronis wrote:In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.
I would not be opposed to this. If we have a better scumread I say go for that instead, but other than the possibility of them being a Jester, lynching them won't harm us and we have no shortage of lynches today.
In post 260, Kraeg wrote:In post 249, Aronis wrote:In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.
I would not be opposed to this. If we have a better scumread I say go for that instead, but other than the possibility of them being a Jester, lynching them won't harm us and we have no shortage of lynches today.
I definitely agree with this. One of the neutral should be lynched. I know that they won't harm us right now, but later in the game they will because of course they don't care who gets lynched. The scum will most likely not kill them. It would be harder in the later part of the game to lynch a scum because there are some players who simply don't care at all.
In post 259, Firebringer wrote:In post 258, Professor Bozo wrote:WILL PEOPLE STOP TRYING TO FUCKING LYNCH MOLLIE?
No, if she doesn't claim. She is eating rope.
In post 261, Firebringer wrote:You have zero reason to fight for her not getting lynched.
She isn't cooperating with town, and seriously you are pissing me off Ika.
But if Frogger were anti-town, why would he claim neutral to begin with? The fact that he had the gut to claim neutral makes me trust him a bit. The same does not apply to Yreckt though, as he claimed last.In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.
In post 264, Professor Bozo wrote:fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.
i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now
In post 253, Zymf wrote:This means all town/neutral roles have been claimed, yay- If the rest of the players want to claim, they have to counterclaim some players ^^
Players who haven't claimed yet:Hippy Love, Idiot Savant, Ranger, Dwlee99, Kraeg
VOTE: Kraeg (He doubted Fire's approach and used that as an excuse for not claiming)
Okay never mind.. hmm
In post 265, Firebringer wrote:Shut up Ika, you are asking us to not lynch Mollie over no reason what so ever.
Their is 0 case except that you like mollie.
do you seriously not think she shouldn't claim?
Like what is your logic here, she can be the only one not claim? Cause.....that will help town.
In post 267, Firebringer wrote:In post 264, Professor Bozo wrote:fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.
i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH THIS GAME WE ARE IN!!!!
LISTEN TO YOURSELF FOR A MINUTE PLEASE!!!