In post 338, Aquanim wrote:Do not turn this game into another Blitz 1, you two.
Listen this isn't the same at all.
Titus arguments are weak.
Look at her day 1 engagement vs this.
Asking questions there. Not asking them here.
Trying to figure motoves there.
Pushing weak reasoning here.
Not the same at all
If you want to make a meta argument I suppose I'm listening. It is true that Titus' engagement with Blitz 1 early in the game was greater IIRC. Not a scumclaim but it's a valid point.
What I am not interested in is either of you,
whether your assessment is correct or not
, justifying your play there or bitching about that town. This isn't the place for that, it's not relevant to this game, and all it will lead to is ill feeling we don't need.
I'm not doing that.
I'm not sure where that came from but all I'm saying in regards to Titus is that she isn't making a strong case and thinks she's scored scum that confidently is scum bussing or trying to help there scum buddy from being lynched.
I can't remember how Titus feels about bussing as scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Farside, really? You go through the hassle to remember my alleged activity level (p.s. I had a bit of work and Saturday game night) but cannot remember I almost never bus as scum?
You are also saying my case is weak and therefore scummy? That's markedly different from how to treat me meta wise.
You're also patently trying vague unknown assoiatives by stating whatever ipip/Laho flip, I'm scum.
That's narrative crafting. Pick a side. You had a scumread on Laho but backed off because my case was weak allegedly.
No, you backed off because the Laho wagon might go through. If you were concerned about my vote, you merely would have unvoted, not vote the major counter wagon.
In post 356, Titus wrote:Farside, really? You go through the hassle to remember my alleged activity level (p.s. I had a bit of work and Saturday game night) but cannot remember I almost never bus as scum?
You are also saying my case is weak and therefore scummy? That's markedly different from how to treat me meta wise.
You're also patently trying vague unknown assoiatives by stating whatever ipip/Laho flip, I'm scum.
That's narrative crafting. Pick a side. You had a scumread on Laho but backed off because my case was weak allegedly.
No, you backed off because the Laho wagon might go through. If you were concerned about my vote, you merely would have unvoted, not vote the major counter wagon.
I don't have to pick a side with Laho today if I'm sure your scum today.
After that your scum biddies will kill me.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Also the rest of your points are invalid.
I already explained my vote on pip and on you Titus.
Just because you are spinning a story to enchant others doesn't mean jack to me.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Yeah you do. You're trying to provoke me into perceived anti-town behavior and avoiding discussing substance. You're trying to avoid discussing your bus vote on Laho. Loha. Whatever.
In post 360, Titus wrote:Yeah you do. You're trying to provoke me into perceived anti-town behavior and avoiding discussing substance. You're trying to avoid discussing your bus vote on Laho. Loha. Whatever.
Yeah that comment isn't misleading at all there.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Come on Titus I'm already voting you and all you've done is allude to an associate without a flip based on weak reason.
If anyone really is buying that I'd love to know why.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 299, itlepip wrote:TLDR: Titus is a god and you should just give in and follow whatever she says, because if she is town we will win and if she is scum the game is already over...
Dangit, I was liking Titus's defense of me .
Also not a fan of pisskops pings that seem to just be following the aqua-farside-yakko groupthink.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 330, TheLhix wrote:I am fucking dying. I am literally fucking dying. Yakko I challenge you to a death match. Titus, back me up with dem fist. /Rant end
I think Farside is acting like a silly bugger. Dont know what that means wrt her alignment yet though.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 299, itlepip wrote:TLDR: Titus is a god and you should just give in and follow whatever she says, because if she is town we will win and if she is scum the game is already over...
Dangit, I was liking Titus's defense of me :(.
Also not a fan of pisskops pings that seem to just be following the aqua-farside-yakko groupthink.
ITP pip buddying with titus
I have already been pocketed by Titus, not sure how much me buddying titus is going to do.
In post 338, Aquanim wrote:Do not turn this game into another Blitz 1, you two.
Listen this isn't the same at all.
Titus arguments are weak.
Look at her day 1 engagement vs this.
Asking questions there. Not asking them here.
Trying to figure motoves there.
Pushing weak reasoning here.
Not the same at all
If you want to make a meta argument I suppose I'm listening. It is true that Titus' engagement with Blitz 1 early in the game was greater IIRC. Not a scumclaim but it's a valid point.
What I am not interested in is either of you,
whether your assessment is correct or not
, justifying your play there or bitching about that town. This isn't the place for that, it's not relevant to this game, and all it will lead to is ill feeling we don't need.
town cred for driving the game away from unnecessary clutter
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
. 